The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying topological order by entanglement entropy
Open accessAbstract
Topological phases are unique states of matter that incorporate long-range quantum entanglement and host exotic excitations with fractional quantum statistics. Here we report a practical method to identify topological phases in arbitrary realistic models by accurately calculating the topological entanglement entropy using the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG). We argue that the DMRG algorithm systematically selects a minimally entangled state from the quasi-degenerate ground states in a topological phase. This tendency explains both the success of our method and the absence of ground-state degeneracy in previous DMRG studies of topological phases. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our procedure by obtaining the topological entanglement entropy for several microscopic models, with an accuracy of the order of 10−3, when the circumference of the cylinder is around ten times the correlation length. As an example, we definitively show that the ground state of the quantum S = 1/2 antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice is a topological spin liquid, and strongly constrain the conditions for identification of this phase of matter. Topological entanglement entropy provides a robust measure for detecting the long-range entanglement that characterizes quantum ground states displaying topological order. A new method for calculating this entropy isolates minimally entangled states from the ground states of a topological phase—offering a reliable test for identifying topological spin liquids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
Spin liquids in frustrated magnets
Balents, L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08917 · Cited by 4,316
Self-citationStudying Two-Dimensional Systems with the Density Matrix Renormalization Group
Stoudenmire, E. M., & White, S. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125018 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system
Islam, R., Ma, R., Preiss, P. M., Eric Tai, M., Lukin, A., Rispoli, M., & Greiner, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15750 · Cited by 1,158
Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems
Laflorencie, N. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.008 · Cited by 765
Colloquium : Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid
Norman, M. R. (2016) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.041002 · Cited by 580
TOPOLOGICAL FLAT BAND MODELS AND FRACTIONAL CHERN INSULATORS
BERGHOLTZ, E. J., & LIU, Z. (2013) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s021797921330017x · Cited by 522
Physics of the Kitaev Model: Fractionalization, Dynamic Correlations, and Material Connections
Hermanns, M., Kimchi, I., & Knolle, J. (2018) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-053934 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, H.-C., Wang, Z., & Balents, L.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2012-11-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 902-905
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W2161021349
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying topological order by entanglement entropy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphys2465
- The paper
- Jiang, H.-C., Wang, Z., & Balents, L. (2012). Identifying topological order by entanglement entropy. Nature Physics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2465
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.