CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 404

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observation of the optical spin Hall effect

Leyder, C., Romanelli, M., Karr, J. Ph., Giacobino, E., Liew, T. C. H., Glazov, M. M., Kavokin, A. V., Malpuech, G., Bramati, A.·2007·Nature Physics
DOI 10.1038/nphys676
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys676

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When light is strongly confined transverse to its propagation direction, intrinsic spin-orbit coupling can lead to behavior reminiscent of the electronic quantum spin Hall effect.

    “When light is strongly confined transverse to its propagation direction, intrinsic spin-orbit coupling can lead to behavior reminiscent of the electronic quantum spin Hall effect (Kavokin, Malpuech, and Glazov, 2005;Leyder et al., 2007;Bliokh, Smirnova, and Nori, 2015;Van Mechelen and Jacob, 2016).”

    From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Leyder et al., 2007

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Dyakonov, M. I. & Perel, V. I. Current induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors. Phys. Lett. A 35, 459–460 (1971). · DOI
  2. Kato, Y. K., Myers, R. C., Gossard, A. C. & Awshalom, D. D. Observation of the spin Hall effect in semiconductors. Science 306, 1910–1913 (2004). · DOI
  3. Wunderlich, J., Kaestner, B., Sinova, J. & Jungwirth, T. Experimental observation of the spin-Hall effect in a two-dimensional spin–orbit coupled semiconductor system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 047204 (2005). · DOI
  4. Valenzuela, S. O. & Tinkham, M. Direct electronic measurement of the spin Hall effect. Nature 442, 176–179 (2006). · DOI
  5. Mishchenko, E. G., Shytov, A. V. & Halperin, B. I. Spin current and polarization in impure two-dimensional electron systems with spin–orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 226602 (2004). · DOI
  6. Kavokin, A. V., Malpuech, G. & Glazov, M. M. Optical spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 136601 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kavokin, A. V. & Malpuech, G. Cavity Polaritons (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003).
  8. Awshalom, D. D., Loss, D. & Samarth, N. Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation (Springer, Berlin, 2002). · DOI
  9. Murakami, S., Nagaosa, N. & Zhang, S.-C. Dissipationless quantum spin current at room temperature. Science 301, 1348–1351 (2003). · DOI
  10. Sinova, J. et al. Universal intrinsic spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126603–126606 (2004). · DOI
  11. Sih, V. et al. Spatial imaging of the spin Hall effect and current-induced polarization in two-dimensional electron gases. Nature Phys. 1, 31–35 (2005). · DOI
  12. Chalaev, O. & Loss, D. Spin-Hall conductivity due to Rashba spin–orbit interaction in disordered systems. Phys. Rev. B 71, 245318–245325 (2005). · DOI
  13. Weisbuch, C., Nishioka, M., Ishikawa, A. & Arakawa, Y. Observation of the coupled exciton–photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3314–3317 (1992). · DOI
  14. Freixanet, T., Sermage, B., Tiberj, A. & Planel, R. In-plane propagation of excitonic cavity polaritons. Phys. Rev. B 61, 7233–7236 (2000). · DOI
  15. Kasprzak, J. et al. Bose–Einstein condensation of exciton–polaritons. Nature 443, 409–414 (2006). · DOI
  16. Karr, J. Ph., Baas, A., Houdré, H. & Giacobino, E. Squeezing in semiconductor microcavities in the strong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. A 69, 031802(R) (2004). · DOI
  17. Baas, A., Karr, J. Ph., Romanelli, M., Bramati, A. & Giacobino, E. Quantum degeneracy of microcavity polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 176401 (2006). · DOI
  18. Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of Optics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Shelykh, I., Malpuech, G., Kavokin, K. V., Kavokin, A. V. & Bigenwald, P. Spin dynamics of exciton polaritons in microcavities. Phys. Rev. B 70, 115301 (2004). · DOI
  20. Maialle, Z. M., de Andrada e Silva, E. A. & Sham, L. J. Exciton spin dynamics in quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 47, 15776 (1993). · DOI
  21. Panzarini, G. et al. Exciton-light coupling in single and coupled semiconductor microcavities: Polariton dispersion and polarization splitting. Phys. Rev. B 59, 5082–5089 (1999). · DOI
  22. Langbein, W. Proc. 26th Int. Conf. on Physics of Semiconductors 112 (Institute of Physics, Bristol, 2003).
  23. Langbein, W. et al. Polarization beats in ballistic propagation of exciton–polaritons in microcavities. Phys. Rev. B 75, 075323–075331 (2007). · DOI
  24. Haacke, S. Resonant Rayleigh scattering by Wannier excitons in a two-dimensional disordered potential. Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 737–776 (2001). · DOI
  25. Langbein, W. & Hvam, J. M. Elastic dynamics of cavity polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047401–047404 (2002). · DOI
  26. Houdré, R., Weisbuch, C., Stanley, R. P., Oesterle, U. & Ilegems, M. Coherence effects in light scattering of two-dimensional photonic disordered systems: Elastic scattering of cavity polaritons. Phys. Rev. B 61, R13333–R13336 (2000). · DOI
  27. Savona, V. & Langbein, W. Realistic heterointerface model for excitonic states in growth-interrupted GaAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. B 74, 75311 (2006). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Leyder, C., Romanelli, M., Karr, J. P., Giacobino, E., Liew, T. C. H., Glazov, M. M., Kavokin, A. V., Malpuech, G., & Bramati, A.
Venue
Nature Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-07-15
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
628-631
ISSN
  • 1745-2473
  • 1745-2481
DOI
10.1038/nphys676
Cited by
404
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review