Cited by 615Orbital Angular Momentum in OpticsQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsTopological Materials and Phenomena

Geometrodynamics of spinning light

Open access
Bliokh, Konstantin Y., Niv, Avi, Kleiner, Vladimir, Hasman, Erez·2008·Nature Photonics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2008.229

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SOI of light at sharp interfaces also causes transverse polarization-dependent deflections (momentum shifts) of reflected or refracted beams away from the angle predicted by geometrical optics.

    “Interestingly, the SOI of light at sharp interfaces also causes transverse polarization-dependent deflections (i.e., momentum shifts) of the reflected or refracted beams away from the angle predicted by geometrical optics 18,72,73,80 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Basic theory section links spin–orbit effects to an Imbert–Fedorov transverse shift upon reflection or refraction at sharp interfaces. The supplementary section on propagation along a reflecting surface describes that shift as a displacement out of the propagation plane, not a momentum shift or a departure from the geometrical-optics reflection or refraction angle. The copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A finite-size beam consists of multiple plane waves with slightly different wavevectors, so they have slightly different planes of incidence, which induces geometric phases and determines a beam shift along the y-axis out of the plane of incidence.

    “At the same time, a finite size beam consists of multiple plane waves with slightly different wavevectors k (Fig. 1c), so that they have slightly different planes of incidence entering the Fresnel reflection/refraction equations.”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [18]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A similar trajectory effect for light beams in specially designed photonic structures has been recently predicted.

    “The similar trajectory effect for light beams in specially designed photonic structures have been recently predicted [11, 12].”

    From <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Zitterbewegung</mml:mi></mml:math> of exciton-polaritons (2018) · cites this paper as [12]

    The opening section predicts a polarization-dependent deflection of light beams on curved trajectories, and Basic theory describes oppositely directed deflections. The Experiment section uses a glass cylinder to create such trajectories, but the paper does not describe this as a prediction for specially designed photonic structures; it also reports direct observation of the effect. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A circularly polarized laser beam reflected or refracted at a dielectric interface experiences a tiny transverse spin-dependent shift out of the plane of incidence.

    “(i) A circularly polarized laser beam reflected or refracted at a dielectric interface does not propagate in the original plane but experiences a tiny transverse spin-dependent shift out of this plane.”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [18]

  • In the simplest case of total reflection from an interface, the reflected beam acquires a helicity-dependent shift (the Imbert-Fedorov shift).

    “In the simplest case of total reflection from the interface, the reflected beam acquires the helicity-dependent shift”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bliokh, K. Y., Niv, A., Kleiner, V., & Hasman, E.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Bliokh, Konstantin Y.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2008-11-23
Volume
2
Issue
12
Pages
748-753
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W1976993216
Cited by
615
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 24
FWCI
10.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
Keywords
spin Hall effect, Berry phase, spin-orbit coupling, geometrical optics, nanophotonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review