The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observation of quantum-measurement backaction with an ultracold atomic gas
Open accessAbstract
Nanoscale beams are one platform for exploring quantum-mechanical phenomena in ever-larger systems. The collective motion of a macroscopic ensemble of ultracold atoms confined in an optical cavity is established as an alternative approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
Cited by
Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J., & Marquardt, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1391 · Cited by 5,501
Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity
Baumann, K., Guerlin, C., Brennecke, F., & Esslinger, T. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09009 · Cited by 1,530
Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials
Ritsch, H., Domokos, P., Brennecke, F., & Esslinger, T. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.553 · Cited by 933
Marquardt, F., & Girvin, S. (2009) · Physics · doi:10.1103/physics.2.40 · Cited by 731
Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems
Sieberer, L. M., Buchhold, M., & Diehl, S. (2016) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096001 · Cited by 568
Metadata
- Authors
- Murch, K. W., Moore, K. L., Gupta, S., & Stamper-Kurn, D. M.
- Venue
- Nature Physics
- Published
- 2008-05-18
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 561-564
- ISSN
- 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2481
- OpenAlex
- W1970376852
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
