Cited by 106Hallucinations in medical conditionsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Abnormal connectivity between the default mode and the visual system underlies the manifestation of visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease: a task-based fMRI study

Open access
Shine, James M, Muller, Alana J, O’Callaghan, Claire, Hornberger, Michael, Halliday, Glenda M, Lewis, Simon JG·2015·npj Parkinson's Disease

Abstract

Background: The neural substrates of visual hallucinations remain an enigma, due primarily to the difficulties associated with directly interrogating the brain during hallucinatory episodes. Aims: To delineate the functional patterns of brain network activity and connectivity underlying visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease. Methods: In this study, we combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a behavioral task capable of eliciting visual misperceptions, a confirmed surrogate for visual hallucinations, in 35 patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. We then applied an independent component analysis to extract time series information for large-scale neuronal networks that have been previously implicated in the pathophysiology of visual hallucinations. These data were subjected to a task-based functional connectivity analysis, thus providing the first objective description of the neural activity and connectivity during visual hallucinations in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Results: Correct performance of the task was associated with increased activity in primary visual regions; however, during visual misperceptions, this same visual network became actively coupled with the default mode network (DMN). Further, the frequency of misperception errors on the task was positively correlated with the strength of connectivity between these two systems, as well as with decreased activity in the dorsal attention network (DAN), and with impaired connectivity between the DAN and the DMNs, and ventral attention networks. Finally, each of the network abnormalities identified in our analysis were significantly correlated with two independent clinical measures of hallucination severity. Conclusions: Together, these results provide evidence that visual hallucinations are due to increased engagement of the DMN with the primary visual system, and emphasize the role of dysfunctional engagement of attentional networks in the pathophysiology of hallucinations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npjparkd.2015.3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 106

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Shine JM, Halliday GM, Naismith SL, Lewis SJG. Visual misperceptions and hallucinations in Parkinson's disease: dysfunction of attentional control networks?. Mov Disord 2011; 26: 2154–2159. 21953814
  2. Spreng RN, Stevens WD, Chamberlain JP, Gilmore AW, Schacter DL. Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition. Neuroimage 2010; 53: 303–317. 20600998 PMC2914129

Authors
Shine, J. M., Muller, A. J., O’Callaghan, C., Hornberger, M., Halliday, G. M., & Lewis, S. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Shine, James M
Venue
npj Parkinson's Disease
Published
2015-04-22
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
15003-15003
ISSN
2373-8057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313751601
Cited by
106
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Parkinson s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
visual hallucinations, Parkinson's disease, default mode network, visual misperception, functional connectivity, dorsal attention network, ventral attention network, primary visual cortex, attentional networks, hallucination severity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review