Cited by 57Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Impaired Off-Line Consolidation of Motor Memories After Combined Blockade of Cholinergic Receptors During REM Sleep-Rich Sleep

Rasch, Björn, Gais, Steffen, Born, Jan·2009·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep has been considered important for the consolidation of memories, particularly of procedural skills. REM sleep, in contrast to slow-wave sleep (SWS), is hallmarked by the high, wake-like activity of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh), which promotes certain synaptic plastic processes underlying the formation of memories. Here, we show in healthy young men that off-line consolidation of a motor skill during a period of late sleep with high amounts of REM sleep depends essentially on high cholinergic activity. After a 3-h sleep period during the early night to satisfy the need for SWS, subjects learned a procedural finger sequence tapping task and a declarative word-pair learning task. After learning, they received either placebo or a combination of the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine (4 microg/kg bodyweight, intravenously) and the nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine (5 mg, orally), and then slept for another 3 h, ie, the late nocturnal sleep period, which is dominated by REM sleep. Retrieval was tested the following evening. Combined cholinergic receptor blockade significantly impaired motor skill consolidation, whereas word-pair memory remained unaffected. Additional data show that the impairing effect of cholinergic receptor blockade is specific to sleep-dependent consolidation of motor skill and does not occur during a wake-retention interval. Taken together, these results identify high cholinergic activity during late, REM sleep-rich sleep as an essential factor promoting sleep-dependent consolidation of motor skills.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2009.6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep stage 2 duration and fast spindle density predict sleep-dependent improvements in a finger tapping task.

    “Training on motor tasks increased the time spent in stage 2 and the density of fast (but not slow) spindles (399, 837, 920, 921, 1173, 1174), and sleep stage 2 duration and fast spindle density also predicted sleep-dependent improvements in a finger tapping task (59,961,1285,1286).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [961]

  • Anticholinergic treatment during wakefulness after learning is ineffective.

    “Anticholinergic treatment during wakefulness after learning remained ineffective (961).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [961]

  • In humans, combined blockade of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors during REM-rich late sleep impairs off-line consolidation of a motor skill (finger sequence tapping) without affecting declarative memories.

    “In humans, the combined blockade of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors during REM-rich late sleep impaired off-line consolidation of a motor skill (finger sequence tapping) without affecting declarative memories (961).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [961]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 57

Authors
Rasch, B., Gais, S., & Born, J.
Affiliations
University of Lübeck (DE)
Corresponding author
Rasch, Björn
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2009-02-04
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1843-1853
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2016565949
Cited by
57
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB654)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
REM sleep, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, motor skill learning, cholinergic system, acetylcholine, scopolamine, mecamylamine, muscarinic receptor blockade, procedural memory, declarative memory, slow-wave sleep, finger tapping task, word pair learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Association Learning, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Mecamylamine, Memory Disorders, Motor Skills, Neuropsychological Tests, Neurosecretory Systems, Reaction Time, Receptors, Cholinergic, Scopolamine, Sleep, REM, Cholinergic Antagonists, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review