Cited by 48Smoking Behavior and CessationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Dopamine Function in Cigarette Smokers: An [18F]-DOPA PET Study

Open access
Bloomfield, Michael AP, Pepper, Fiona, Egerton, Alice, Demjaha, Arsime, Tomasi, Gianpaolo, Mouchlianitis, Elias, Maximen, Levi, Veronese, Mattia +3 more·2014·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Tobacco addiction is a global public health problem. Addiction to tobacco is thought to involve the effects of nicotine on the dopaminergic system. Only one study has previously investigated dopamine synthesis capacity in cigarette smokers. This study, exclusively in male volunteers, reported increased dopamine synthesis capacity in heavy smokers compared with non-smokers. We sought to determine whether dopamine synthesis capacity was elevated in a larger sample of cigarette smokers that included females. Dopamine synthesis capacity was measured in 15 daily moderate smokers with 15 sex- and age-matched control subjects who had never smoked tobacco. Dopamine synthesis capacity (indexed as the influx rate constant K(i)(cer)) was measured with positron emission tomography and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine. There was no significant group difference in dopamine synthesis capacity between smokers and non-smoker controls in the whole striatum (t28=0.64, p=0.53) or any of its functional subdivisions. In smokers, there were no significant relationships between the number of cigarettes smoked per day and dopamine synthesis capacity in the whole striatum (r=-0.23, p=0.41) or any striatal subdivision. These findings indicate that moderate smoking is not associated with altered striatal dopamine synthesis capacity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2014.87

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heavy smoking can influence dopamine function.

    “As the amount of smoking differed in the groups and heavy smoking can influence dopamine function (Bloomfield et al., 2014; Salokangas et al., 2000), we performed an ANCOVA to examine whether smoking was influencing our findings.”
  • An ANCOVA was performed to examine whether smoking was influencing the findings, because the amount of smoking differed in the groups and heavy smoking can influence dopamine function.

    “As the amount of smoking differed in the groups and heavy smoking can influence dopamine function (Bloomfield et al., 2014; Salokangas et al., 2000), we performed an ANCOVA to examine whether smoking was influencing our findings.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. First MB SR, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1996). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID- CV).. American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.
  2. Kumakura Y, Cumming P (2009). PET studies of cerebral levodopa metabolism: a review of clinical findings and modeling approaches. Neuroscientist 15: 635-650.
  3. Menossi HS, Goudriaan AE, de Azevedo-Marques Pe ´rico C, Nicastri S, de Andrade AG, D'Elia G et al (2013). Neural bases of pharmacological treatment of nicotine dependence-insights from functional brain imaging: a systematic review. CNS Drugs 27: 921-941.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloomfield, M. A., Pepper, F., Egerton, A., Demjaha, A., Tomasi, G., Mouchlianitis, E., Maximen, L., Veronese, M., Turkheimer, F., Selvaraj, S., & Howes, O. D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Howes, Oliver D
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2014-04-10
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
2397-2404
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2075511206
Cited by
48
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • McKnight Foundation
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2014-18-010)
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
dopamine synthesis capacity, cigarette smoking, tobacco dependence, striatum, 18F-DOPA PET, nicotine, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Corpus Striatum, Dihydroxyphenylalanine, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Case-Control Studies, Radiopharmaceuticals, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review