Cited by 219Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A Primer on Foraging and the Explore/Exploit Trade-Off for Psychiatry Research

Open access
Addicott, M A, Pearson, J M, Sweitzer, M M, Barack, D L, Platt, M L·2017·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Foraging is a fundamental behavior, and many types of animals appear to have solved foraging problems using a shared set of mechanisms. Perhaps the most common foraging problem is the choice between exploiting a familiar option for a known reward and exploring unfamiliar options for unknown rewards-the so-called explore/exploit trade-off. This trade-off has been studied extensively in behavioral ecology and computational neuroscience, but is relatively new to the field of psychiatry. Explore/exploit paradigms can offer psychiatry research a new approach to studying motivation, outcome valuation, and effort-related processes, which are disrupted in many mental and emotional disorders. In addition, the explore/exploit trade-off encompasses elements of risk-taking and impulsivity-common behaviors in psychiatric disorders-and provides a novel framework for understanding these behaviors within an ecological context. Here we explain relevant concepts and some common paradigms used to measure explore/exploit decisions in the laboratory, review clinically relevant research on the neurobiology and neuroanatomy of explore/exploit decision making, and discuss how computational psychiatry can benefit from foraging theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2017.108

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In substance use or gambling addictions, the balance shifts toward exploitation over exploration.

    “В сторону преобладания использования над исследованием баланс смещается при зависимостях от психоактивных веществ или азартных игр.”

    From Когнитивные механизмы дисфункционального принятия решений при психических расстройствах (2025) · cites this paper as Addicott et al., 2017

    The Conclusion says several studies suggest addictive disorders are associated with reduced exploration and increased exploitation, and the Psychiatry Research section reports greater exploitation in drug-dependent samples. But the paper does not establish this pattern for gambling addiction: its Conclusion reports that frequent gamblers made more exploratory choices, and frequent gambling is not necessarily gambling addiction. The claim therefore extends the substance-use finding to a group the cited evidence does not support. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People with substance use or gambling addictions overly rely on previous positive reinforcement, choosing an inflexible exploitation strategy and underestimating objective changes in conditions.

    “Люди с этими расстройствами чрезмерно опираются на свой предыдущий опыт положительного подкрепления, выбирая негибкую стратегию использования и недооценивая объективные перемены условий (Addicott et al., 2017).”

    From Когнитивные механизмы дисфункционального принятия решений при психических расстройствах (2025) · cites this paper as Addicott et al., 2017

    The Conclusion (page not available) says studies suggest addictive disorders are associated with less exploration, more exploitation, and a preference for familiar, expected rewards. Psychiatry Research (page not available) also reports difficulty updating knowledge of the environment in methamphetamine-dependent participants. The cited passages do not establish this pattern specifically for gambling addiction or show that affected people underestimate objective changes in conditions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Adams GK, Watson KK, Pearson JM, Platt ML (2012). Neuroethol- ogy of decision-making. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22: 982-989.
  2. Addicott MA, Pearson JM, Froeliger B, Platt ML, McClernon FJ (2014). Smoking automaticity and tolerance moderate brain activation during explore-exploit behavior. Psychiat Res 224: 254-261.
  3. Addicott MA, Pearson JM, Kaiser N, Platt ML, McClernon FJ (2015). Suboptimal foraging behavior: a new perspective on gambling. Behav Neurosci 129: 656-665.
  4. Browning M, Behrens TE, Jocham G, O'Reilly J, Bishop SJ (2015). Anxious individuals have difficulty learning the causal statistics of aversive environments. Nat Neurosci 18: 590-596.
  5. Hayden BY, Pearson JM, Platt ML (2011). Neuronal basis of sequential foraging decisions in a patchy environment. Nat Neurosci 14: 933-939.
  6. Pearson JM, Hayden BY, Raghavachari S, Platt ML (2009). Neurons in posterior cingulate cortex signal exploratory decisions in a dynamic multioption choice task. Curr Biol 19: 1532-1537.
  7. Pearson JM, Heilbronner SR, Barack DL, Hayden BY, Platt ML (2011). Posterior cingulate cortex: adapting behavior to a changing world. Trends Cogn Sci 15: 143-151.
  8. Pearson JM, Watson KK, Platt ML (2014). Decision making: the neuroethological turn. Neuron 82: 950-965.
  9. Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007). Foraging: Behavior and Ecology. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
  10. Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA.
  11. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduc- tion. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
  12. Thiruchselvam T, Malik S, Le Foll B (2016). A review of positron emission tomography studies exploring the dopaminergic system in substance use with a focus on tobacco as a co-variate. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1-18.
  13. Verdejo-Garcia A, Lawrence AJ, Clark L (2008). Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32: 777-810.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Addicott, M. A., Pearson, J. M., Sweitzer, M. M., Barack, D. L., & Platt, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Addicott, M A
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2017-05-29
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
1931-1939
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2616909309
Cited by
219
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA039294, K01DA033347)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (K01ES025442)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
foraging theory, explore-exploit trade-off, decision-making, motivation, outcome valuation, effort, risk-taking, impulsivity, computational psychiatry, neurobiology of decision-making, mental illness
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetitive Behavior, Mental Disorders, Brain, Decision Making, Exploratory Behavior, Humans, Psychiatry, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review