The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RIPK1 counteracts ZBP1-mediated necroptosis to inhibit inflammation
Lin, J., Kumari, S., Kim, C., Van, T.-M., Wachsmuth, L., Polykratis, A., & Pasparakis, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20558 · Cited by 421
Toxicity of Nanomaterials: Exposure, Pathways, Assessment, and Recent Advances
Ganguly, P., Breen, A., & Pillai, S. C. (2018) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00068 · Cited by 341
Manickam, S., Muthoosamy, K., Geetha Bai, R., Babangida Abubakar, I., Mudavasseril Sudheer, S., Hongngee, L., Hwei-San, L., Nayming, H., & Ch, C. (2015) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s75213 · Cited by 204
Gruber, S., & Nickel, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Medical Technology · doi:10.3389/fmedt.2023.1195529 · Cited by 200
Heme drives hemolysis-induced susceptibility to infection via disruption of phagocyte functions
Martins, R., Maier, J., Gorki, A.-D., Huber, K. V. M., Sharif, O., Starkl, P., Saluzzo, S., Quattrone, F., Gawish, R., Lakovits, K., et al. (2016) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3590 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Repetto, G., del Peso, A., & Zurita, J. L.
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2008-06-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1125-1131
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W1964066906
- Cited by
- 2,207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nprot.2008.75
- The paper
- Repetto, G., del Peso, A., & Zurita, J. L. (2008). Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.75
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
