The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of Mycoplasma in cell cultures
Abstract
Mycoplasma is a prokaryotic organism that is a frequent and occult contaminant of cell cultures. This organism can modify many aspects of cell physiology, rendering experiments that are conducted with contaminated cells worthless. Because of their small size, Mycoplasmas can pass through filters used to prevent bacterial and fungal contamination and potentially spread to all the cultures in a laboratory. It is essential that all new cell cultures entering a laboratory and all cell banks are tested for the presence of Mycoplasma. It is recommended that two techniques be used, selected from a PCR-based method, indirect staining and an agar and broth culture. This protocol describes these three tests for detecting Mycoplasma, which take from 1 d to 3-4 weeks, and such tests should be an obligatory component of quality control in every tissue culture laboratory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Contamination with mycoplasma was ruled out by PCR testing according to standard protocols37.”
From Common germline variants of the human APOE gene modulate melanoma progression and survival (2020) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Hay, R.J., Macy, M.L. & Chen, T.R. Mycoplasma infection of cultured cells. Nature 339, 487–488 (1989). · DOI
- Rottem, S. & Naot, Y. Subversion and exploitation of host cells by mycoplasmas. Trends Microbiol. 6, 436–440 (1998). · DOI
- Freshney, R.I. Culture of Animal Cells 5th edn. 307–320 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2005). · DOI
- Uphoff, C.C. & Drexler, H.G. Detection of mycoplasma contaminations. Methods Mol. Biol. 290, 13–23 (2005).
- UKCCCR. UKCCCR guidelines for the use of cell lines in cancer research. Br. J. Cancer 82, 1495–1509 (2000). · DOI
- Masters, J.R. & Stacey, G.N. Changing medium and passaging cell lines. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2276–2284 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, T.R. In situ detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures by fluorescent Hoechst 33258 stain. Exp. Cell Res. 104, 255–262 (1977). · DOI
- Uphoff, C.C., Gignac, S.M. & Drexler, H.G. Mycoplasma contamination in human leukemia cell lines. I. Comparison of various detection methods. J. Immunol. Methods 149, 43–53 (1992). · DOI
- Uphoff, C.C. & Drexler, H.G. Comparative PCR analysis for detection of mycoplasma infections in continuous cell lines. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 38, 79–85 (2002). · DOI
- Uphoff, C.C. & Drexler, H.G. Detecting Mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures by polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol. Med. 88, 319–326 (2004).
- van Kuppeveld, F.J.M. et al. Genus- and species-specific identification of mycoplasmas by 16S rRNA amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 2606–2615 (1992). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–274 of 274
Quality Assured Characterization of Stem Cells for Safety in Banking for Clinical Application
Bruce, K., Campbell, J. D. M., & Sousa, P. A. D. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6921-0_6 · Cited by 3
Bamba, K., Takabe, K., Daitoku, H., Tanaka, Y., Ohtani, A., Ozawa, M., Fukamizu, A., Nomura, N., Kohara, A., & Kunoh, T. (2024) · Sensors & Diagnostics · doi:10.1039/d3sd00175j · Cited by 2
Dahlan, N., Ketabat, F., Avery, K., Tabil, X. L., Khoz, S., Altarriba, E., Dhar, N., & Chen, X.-B. (2025) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.70290 · Cited by 2
“Maintain cells in the cell culture incubator and confirm that they are tested negative for mycoplasma using the agar-and-broth or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods (Siegl et al., 2023; Young et al., 2010).”
Leguizamón, M. A., Buján, S., Sánchez, Y., Pontillo, C. A., Chiappini, F., Español, A., Randi, A., & Miret, N. (2025) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2025.122620 · Cited by 2
Microphysiological gut-on-chip enables extended in vitro development of Cryptosporidium hominis
Gunasekera, S., Thierry, B., King, B., Monis, P., Carr, J. M., Chopra, A., Watson, M. W., O’Dea, M. A., Cheah, E., Ram, R., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1564806 · Cited by 2
Río, M. D., Nuero-Garcia, O.-M., Roncador, G., Garcimartín-Bailon, R., Cubria, J.-C., Schneider, P., & Rodriguez-Barbosa, J. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1007/s00109-025-02552-x · Cited by 2
Ma, J.-Y., Zhu, X.-K., Heng, Y., Ding, X.-P., Tao, L., & Lu, L.-M. (2024) · Human Cell · doi:10.1007/s13577-024-01026-5 · Cited by 2
“For detection of mycoplasma contamination, the supernatant of CZH1 cells was collected, and PCR was performed as previously described [14].”
Zhao, Y., Wang, P., Qu, X., Yuan, K., Zhu, S., Wang, S., Luan, Q., Zhou, H., Yin, Y.-D., Zhao, Z., et al. (2023) · Laboratory Animals. Journal of the Laboratory Animal Science Association · doi:10.1177/00236772231188172 · Cited by 2
Carrillo-Ávila, J. A., Aguilar‐Quesada, R., Ligero, G., Panadero-Fajardo, S., Santos-Pírez, M. V., & Catalina, P. (2023) · Cytotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10616-022-00567-7 · Cited by 2
“In relation to cell cultures, because high concentrations of Mycoplasma do not cause turbidity and its effects on cell growth may occur unnoticed, the detection of Mycoplasma presents several difficulties (Young et al. 2010).”
BackgroundEstablishment and Characterization of Single and Triple‐Agent Resistant Osteosarcoma Cell Lines
Low, K., Hills, F., Roberts, H. C., & Stordal, B. (2022) · Advances in Biology · doi:10.1002/adbi.202200194 · Cited by 2
Yu, Y., Shen, H., Zhu, J.-Z., Cao, X., Li, Q., Shao, L.-B., & Shen, Z.-Y. (2022) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2022.102720 · Cited by 2
Iterative epigenomic analyses in the same single cellPreprint
Ohnuki, H., Venzon, D. J., Lobanov, A. V., & Tosato, G. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.269068.120 · Cited by 3
Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay relies on “two-factor authentication” by SMG5-SMG7Preprint
Boehm, V., Kueckelmann, S., Gerbracht, J. V., Britto-Borges, T., Altmuller, J., Dieterich, C., & Gehring, N. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.07.07.191437 · Cited by 2
Fedele, C., Li, S., Teng, K., Foster, C. J. R., Peng, D., Ran, H., Mita, P., Geer, M., Hattori, T., Koide, A., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.05.30.125138 · Cited by 2
“Cells were tested routinely (every 3 months) for mycoplasma contamination by PCR (82), and genotyped by STR analysis at IDEXX Bioresearch.”
MethodInfluentialAn atlas of bacterial and viral associations in cancerPreprint
Borchmann, S. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/773200 · Cited by 2
In vitro Evaluation of Biological Effects of Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) Extracts
Marcinčáková, D., Červeňáková, N., & Miłek, M. (2018) · Folia Veterinaria · doi:10.2478/fv-2018-0025 · Cited by 2
Epigenetic regulation of chemokine/chemokine receptor expression.
Baird, A., O'Byrne, K., & Gray, S. (2013) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-426-5_12 · Cited by 2
Best Practices for Authentication of Cell Lines to Ensure Data Reproducibility and Integrity
Vicente, E., Lesniewski, M., Newman, D., Vujaskovic, Z., & Jackson, I. L. (2021) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rade-21-00148.1 · Cited by 3
Longmate, W., Miskin, R. P., Water, L. V. D., & DiPersio, C. (2021) · JID Innovations · doi:10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100017 · Cited by 1
Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor BTKi-2 inhibits mpox virus and vaccinia virus infection
Yang, C., Zhao, R.-C., Huo, S., Zhang, Y.-Q., Feng, J.-X., Gong, M., Zhu, L., Zhang, C.-G., Zhang, L.-Q., Xue, J., et al. (2026) · Virologica Sinica · doi:10.1016/j.virs.2026.06.011 · Cited by 1
“All cell lines were tested regularly to ensure the absence of mycoplasma contamination using PCR-based assays (Young et al., 2010).”
Light-induced 3D-printing of DNA-based Responsive Hydrogels
Drago, C., Baruffaldi, D., Pirri, C. F., Roppolo, I., & Frascella, F. (2026) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2026.105231 · Cited by 1
XMD8-92 and JWG-045 exhibit anti-ferroptotic activities, independently of inhibiting ERK5
Zhang, W., Kan, K., Pidd, A. B., Konteva, G., Xiao, W., Pearson, A. J., Song, Z.-J., Xu, Q., Butterworth, S., Whitmarsh, A., et al. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-42079-w · Cited by 1
“Mycoplasma testing was routinely performed as described 40 .”
CDC7 is a targetable regulator of advanced prostate cancer
Hartono, A. B., Hwang, H., Paparaju, S., Liu, S., Brooks, J. D., Corey, E., & Stoyanova, T. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-29574-2 · Cited by 1
“Cell lines were previously authenticated by Stanford Functional Genomics Facility based on Short Tandem Repeat (STR) profiling and routinely checked for mycoplasma contamination by PCR-based assay 55 .”
Regulating white blood cell activity through the novel universal receptive system
Tetz, V., Kardava, K. M., Vecherkovskaya, M. F., Khodadadi‐Jamayran, A., Tsirigos, A., & Tetz, G. V. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21866-x · Cited by 4
Wang, D., Gao, C., Zhou, C., He, X., Wang, D., Mao, J., & Luo, Z.-J. (2025) · Spine Research · doi:10.1097/br9.0000000000000013 · Cited by 1
Li, M., Liu, S., Zhou, C., Sun, M., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.102133 · Cited by 1
“Methods such as flow cytometry [3], PCR [4], and direct DNA staining [5] can be used to evaluate whether mycoplasma has been effectively eliminated.”
Yin, R., Gan, L., Li, S., Zhao, H., Wei, Y.-N., Wang, J., Liu, B., Ning, L.-H., Feng, Z.-X., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107669 · Cited by 1
Guo, X., Zhang, M., Xu, Z., Yu, Y., & Shen, Z.-Y. (2024) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2024.103557 · Cited by 1
Schusterová, P., Mudroňová, D., Peňazziová, K., Hajdučková, V., & Csank, T. (2024) · Veterinární Medicína · doi:10.17221/106/2023-vetmed · Cited by 1
“The cells were several times passaged in our laboratory and tested negative for mycoplasma (Young et al. 2010).”
Lee, S., Jang, Y., Moon, J., & Chu, K. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.3988/jcn.2023.0300 · Cited by 1
Azevedo, L. P., Rios-Santos, F., Branco, C. L. B., Pressinotti, L. N., Reis, É. D. M., Vandresen-Filho, S., Martins, D. T. D. O., Silva, W. D. A., de Vasconcelos, L. G., Ferraz, R. H. D. S., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.28.551009
“The cells underwent karyotyping and were subjected to monthly tests to detect mycoplasma contamination using DAPI staining ( Young et al., 2010).”
MethodKamat, K., & Inamdar, M. (2023) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2023.103026 · Cited by 1
Establishment of an induced pluripotent stem cell line (JTUi003-A) from a patient with otosclerosis.
Xiong, Y.-P., Wang, Y., Xu, M., Liu, Y., Jiang, H.-Q., Jiang, Z., & Wang, J.-P. (2022) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2022.102666 · Cited by 1
Mathews, S., Rabani, R., Rasti, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2021) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.07.002 · Cited by 1
Randolph, L. N., Jiang, Y., Chang, Y., Bao, X., & Lian, X. L. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.18.435636 · Cited by 1
“Cells were routinely tested to ensure mycoplasma free culture conditions using an established PCR based detection method (41).”
MethodRehabilitation of culture cell lines from mycoplasma infection
Ташута, С. Г., Kuzmych, G., Ватліцова, О. С., & Klestova, Z. (2020) · Naukovì dopovìdì Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu bìoresursiv ì prirodokoristuvannâ Ukraïni · doi:10.31548/dopovidi2020.05.010 · Cited by 1
CRTC1-MAML2 Establishes a PGC1α-IGF1 Circuit that Confers Vulnerability to PPARγ InhibitionPreprint
Musicant, A. M., Parag‐Sharma, K., Gong, W., Sengupta, M., Chatterjee, A., Henry, E. C., Tsai, Y., Hayward, M. C., Sheth, S. H., Betancourt, R., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.03.129668 · Cited by 1
“All cell lines were confirmed mycoplasma-free by PCR as previously described (Young et al., 2010) and using mycoplasma detection primers (see Table S6).”
MethodCell Line Authentication and Characterisation
Masters, J. R., & Reid, Y. A. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0002559.pub2 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBacteriophage and Viral Ecology as Seen Through the Lens of Nucleic Acid Sequence Data
Sakowski, E. G., Kress, W., & Wommack, E. (2011) · doi:10.1002/9781118025666.ch5 · Cited by 1
Lewis, P. A., Silajdžić, E., Brison, D. R., & Kimber, S. J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-37076-7_19-1 · Cited by 4
Quality Assessment and Production of Human Cells for Clinical Use.
Fraser, L., Bruce, K., Campbell, J. D. M., & Sousa, P. D. D. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7825-0_28 · Cited by 1
Lifecycle tissue engineering: An AI-enabled multimodal sensing and digital twin roadmap
Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Wang, C., Tu, L., Zhao, X., Gu, J., Sun, Q., Xing, M. M. Q., & Yang, Y. (2026) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.06.044
Yao, W., Liang, X.-C., Zhang, Z.-H., Li, X.-Y., Ma, X.-R., Zhao, Z.-L., & Wu, Z.-Q. (2026) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2026.108890
Gaete-Argel, A., Ananías-Sáez, C., Rojas-Fuentes, C., Giraldo-Ocampo, S., Jara, D., Hernández‐Díaz, T., Ortega-Orellana, C., López-Palma, D., Akiyama, H., Gummuluru, S., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1912292
Gogesch, P., Kronhart, S., Niles, M. A., Kochs, G., Waibler, Z., & Anzaghe, M. (2026) · Cell Biochemistry and Function · doi:10.1002/cbf.70279
“Although multiple methods for detecting Mycoplasma , such as DNA staining, PCR, ELISA, culture in broth or agar, and immunostaining [9] are available, the physiological features of Mycoplasma enable them to remain undiscovered for a long period of time.”
Buján, S., Miret, N. V., Torres, D., Pontillo, C. A., Chiappini, F., Candia, A. J. N., Agustina, L., Sofia, M. M., Bressan, M., Scicolone, G., et al. (2026) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2026.125482
Nevečeřalová, P., Raschmanová, H., Gorilák, P., & Černý, J. (2026) · Physiological Research · doi:10.33549/physiolres.935712
“Dietary advanced glycosylation end-products are formed during the Maillard reaction at high temperatures [53].”
HPV8-E6 drives coordinated transcriptional and epigenetic reprogramming of keratinocytes
Hufbauer, M., Syed, A., Bormann, F., Hasche, D., Rodríguez‐Paredes, M., Laine, P., Honkimaa, A., Auvinen, P., Auvinen, E., & Akgũl, B. (2026) · Tumour Virus Research · doi:10.1016/j.tvr.2026.200348
“Cells were routinely screened for mycoplasma contamination using PCR-based assays [34].”
Lee, J., Kim, K., Byun, G., & Yeo, W. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems (FLEPS) · doi:10.1109/fleps69128.2026.11645085
“Yet current detection methods including culture assays and PCR require manual sampling and lack real-time capability [5].”
Wang, D., Xiao, M., Zhou, K., Yang, P., Huang, X., Miao, R., Fan, J., Zhang, X., & Wang, S. (2026) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2026.113262
“E , the relative expression of UNC5C and ERK-dependent genes ( DUSP4 , DUSP6 , ETV4 , and ETV5 ) after KRAS G12C -mutant NCI-H23 cells were treated by various concentrations (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 nM) of KRAS G12C -specific inhibitor MRTX849 as indicated, as assessed by quantitative real-time PCR.”
InfluentialGuo, Y., Qin, X., Zhang, J., Bi, H., Hou, S.-T., Ding, Y.-X., Pei, D.-N., Li, X., Pan, Y., Sun, X.-L., et al. (2026) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules31111794
“Currently, several methods are available for Mycoplasma detection, including culture-based methods, indicator cell culture methods (e.g., DNA staining techniques), nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), and biochemical assays [1].”
Dai, J.-Y., Cao, F., Yang, Z.-L., Dong, K., Huang, X.-Z., Bian, X.-C., & Liu, Y.-Q. (2026) · Human Cell · doi:10.1007/s13577-026-01382-4
Left Wrist Osteomyelitis Secondary to Mycoplasma orale : A Case Report
Mielke, N., & Quimby, D. S. (2026) · Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases · doi:10.7326/aimcc.2025.1118
An Analysis of G3BP2 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Bandi, L. S. S., Timon, L., O’Toole, E., O'Connor, D., Andersen, K. N., Mohamed, B. M., Nicholson, S., Fitzmaurice, G., Ryan, R., Young, V., et al. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18060969
“All cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma as per the published PCR protocol [24].”
Go, S.-M., Lee, Y., Nah, J.-J., Gu, H.-O., Jang, I., & Seo, M.-G. (2025) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1657098
A novel and simple workflow for investigating Mycoplasma spp. contamination in cell cultures
Michelon, N. D. F., Júnior, J. V. J. S., Weiblen, R., & Flores, E. F. (2025) · Folia Microbiologica · doi:10.1007/s12223-025-01297-x
“Overall, this extraction approach is a practical and inclusive solution for Mycoplasma spp. detection in research and diagnostic contexts (Carrillo-Ávila et al. 2023a, b; Corral-Vázquez et al. 2017; Sung & Hawkins 2020; Young et al. 2010).”
Zhong, L., Wu, C., Liao, L., Li, J., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2025.2507197
“This cultivation occurred at 37°C under an atmosphere containing 5% CO 2 , until the medium changed colour from red to orange, following the methods we’ve previously described [14].”
Protocol for genetic dissection of class switch recombination using genome-editing tools
Dai, P.-F., Liu, T.-T., Yang, D.-P., Luo, Y., Liu, L. D., Xie, X., Shang, Y.-F., Liu, X.-J., & Meng, F. (2025) · STAR Protocols · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2025.103882
Influence of mycoplasma contamination on the antigen-producing ability of FLK-BLV cell cultures
Vashchyk, Y. V., Kosheliev, V. V., Yurko, P. S., Ladohubets, E. V., & Duchenko, K. A. (2025) · VETERINARY SCIENCE TECHNOLOGIES OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND NATURE MANAGEMENT · doi:10.31890/vttp.2025.11.05
Allerdice, M. E. J., Shooter, S. L., Galletti, M. F. B. M., Hecht, J. A., Karpathy, S. E., & Paddock, C. D. (2025) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01743-24
Куралбаевич, Н. А., Terebay, A. A., Marahovskaya, L. G., Kokanov, S. K., & Seydakhmetova, B. A. (2024) · Biosafety and Biotechnology · doi:10.58318/2957-5702-2024-20-45-56
Wang, X., Zhuang, H., Tan, Y.-T., Lei, F.-R., Li, C., Zhang, C., Yu, X.-B., & Sang, H.-F. (2024) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2024.103528
Luna-Callejas, B., Oropeza-Ramos, L. A., & Ramón‐Gallegos, E. (2023) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-023-03794-y
“In contrast, the PCR and LAMP techniques offer faster molecular alternatives, with LAMP being particularly advantageous due to its isothermal nature and minimal equipment requirements (Young et al. 2010; Uphoff et al. 2012).”
BackgroundMethodRamos-Junior, J. L. P., Monteiro, O., Santos, N. C., Correa, R., Cavalcanti, D. P., Martins, J., Boldrini, L., Granjeiro, J. M., & Folgueras-Flatschart, Á. V. (2023) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2606/1/012017
KAHYA, H., & Karaduman, T. (2022) · İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.38079/igusabder.1114239
Wu, H., Fang, J., Liu, Y., Wang, J.-J., Chen, Z.-N., Wang, J.-P., & Shi, H.-B. (2022) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2022.102783
Park, J. E., Guo, X., Liou, K. C. K., Lynn, S. E., Ng, S. S., Meng, W., Lim, S. C., Leow, M. K., Richards, M., Pennington, D. J., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.21.213397 · Cited by 1
Mariotti, E., Mirabelli, P., D’Alessio, F., Gemei, M., Noto, R. D., Fortunato, G., & Vecchio, L. D. (2011) · BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · doi:10.5772/17351
“All cell lines, as suggested by good tissue culture practice (UKCCR, 2000), were tested for Mollicutes contaminations by two independent methods: the biochemical assay MycoAlert® (Cheong, 2010; Mariotti, 2008) and the aerobic and anaerobic microbiological agar culture (Young et al., 2010).”
MethodRodriguez-Barbosa, J., Azuma, M., Zelinskyy, G., Pérez-Simón, J., & Río, M. D. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4891960
IDENTIFICATION OF MYCOPLASMA CONTAMINATION IN CELL CULTURE
Tkachenko, T., Kokovin, М., Drozd, P., & Prylutska, S. (2023) · Biological Systems Theory and Innovation · doi:10.31548/biologiya14(3-4).2023.007
Liu, B., & Wang, H. (2021) · Springer protocols handbooks/Springer protocols · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1229-3_10
Laboratory control and basic culture protocols for stem cell self-renewal.
Lim, J., Jo, Y. M., & Ahn, J. (2015) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/7651_2014_176
Fundamental Principles of a Stem Cell Biobank
Biunno, I., & Deblasio, P. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03572-7_8
A Sensible Technique to Detect Mollicutes Impurities in Human Cells Cultured in GMP Condition
Ugolotti, E., & Vanni, I. (2014) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0733-5_10
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, L., Sung, J., Stacey, G., & Masters, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Masters, John R
- ORCID
- Stacey, Glyn
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2010-04-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 929-934
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W2092105616
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Keywords
- mycoplasma detection, cell culture contamination, PCR detection, laboratory quality control, tissue culture
- MeSH terms
- Bacteriological Techniques, DNA, Bacterial, Electrophoresis, Agar Gel, Mycoplasma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Staining and Labeling, Time Factors, Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review