Cited by 3Identification and Quantification in FoodViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsResearch Data Management Practices

Best Practices for Authentication of Cell Lines to Ensure Data Reproducibility and Integrity

Vicente, Elisabeth, Lesniewski, Megan, Newman, Diana, Vujaskovic, Zeljko, Jackson, Isabel L.·2021·Radiation Research

Abstract

Cell line misidentification and contamination are major contributors to the reproducibility crisis in academic research. Authentication of cell lines provides assurances of the data generated; however, commercially available cells are often not subjected to rigorous identification testing. In this study, commercially available cell lines underwent testing to confirm cell identity and purity. The methods reported here outline the best practices for cell line authentication. Briefly, a commercially available primary rabbit aortic endothelial cell line was purchased for the intent of producing target proteins necessary for generating species-specific recombinant antibodies. These rabbit-specific antibodies would then be utilized for the development of in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to evaluate blood-based biomarkers of vascular injury after total-body irradiation. To authenticate the cell line, cell identity and purity were determined by single tandem repeat (STR) testing, flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) DNA Barcoding in-house and/or through commercial vendors. Fresh cells obtained from a New Zealand White rabbit (Charles River, Wilmington, DE) were used as a positive control. The results of STR and flow cytometry analyses indicated the cells were not contaminated with human or mouse cells, and that the cells were not of endothelial origin. PCR demonstrated that cells were also not of rabbit origin, which was further confirmed by a third-party vendor. An unopened vial of cells was submitted to another vendor for CO1 DNA Barcoding analysis, which identified the cells as being purely of bovine origin. Results revealed that despite purchase through a commercial vendor, the cell line marketed as primary rabbit aortic endothelial cells were of bovine origin. Purity analysis found cells were misidentified rather than contaminated. Further investigation to determine the cell type was not performed. The most cost-effective and efficient methodology for confirming cell line identity was found to be CO1 DNA Barcoding performed by a commercial vendor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/rade-21-00148.1

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vicente, E., Lesniewski, M., Newman, D., Vujaskovic, Z., & Jackson, I. L.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Jackson, Isabel L.
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2021-12-03
Volume
197
Issue
3
Pages
209-217
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W3215819632
Cited by
3
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
cell line authentication, cell line misidentification, cell line contamination, replication crisis, CO1 DNA barcoding, flow cytometry, PCR, recombinant antibody production, total body irradiation, data integrity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Cell Line, DNA, Rabbits, Reproducibility of Results, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Endothelial Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review