The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system
Open accessAbstract
The PANTHER (protein annotation through evolutionary relationship) classification system (http://www.pantherdb.org/) is a comprehensive system that combines gene function, ontology, pathways and statistical analysis tools that enable biologists to analyze large-scale, genome-wide data from sequencing, proteomics or gene expression experiments. The system is built with 82 complete genomes organized into gene families and subfamilies, and their evolutionary relationships are captured in phylogenetic trees, multiple sequence alignments and statistical models (hidden Markov models or HMMs). Genes are classified according to their function in several different ways: families and subfamilies are annotated with ontology terms (Gene Ontology (GO) and PANTHER protein class), and sequences are assigned to PANTHER pathways. The PANTHER website includes a suite of tools that enable users to browse and query gene functions, and to analyze large-scale experimental data with a number of statistical tests. It is widely used by bench scientists, bioinformaticians, computer scientists and systems biologists. In the 2013 release of PANTHER (v.8.0), in addition to an update of the data content, we redesigned the website interface to improve both user experience and the system's analytical capability. This protocol provides a detailed description of how to analyze genome-wide experimental data with the PANTHER classification system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Self-citationPathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data
Cerami, E. G., Gross, B. E., Demir, E., Rodchenkov, I., Babur, O., Anwar, N., Schultz, N., Bader, G. D., & Sander, C. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1039 · Cited by 1,101
The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing
Demir, E., Cary, M. P., Paley, S., Fukuda, K., Lemer, C., Vastrik, I., Wu, G., D'Eustachio, P., Schaefer, C., Luciano, J., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1666 · Cited by 745 · cited 1×
“Second, the PANTHER pathway supports community standards, and all pathways are available in SBML (systems biology markup language 26 , BioPAX (biological pathway exchange format) 27 and SBGN 25 formats.”
MethodSelf-citationA Genome-Wide Association Study of Depressive Symptoms
Hek, K., Demirkan, A., Lahti, J., Terracciano, A., Teumer, A., Cornelis, M. C., Amin, N., Bakshis, E., Baumert, J., Ding, J., et al. (2013) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.09.033 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Gene set knowledge discovery with enrichr
Xie, Z., Bailey, A., Kuleshov, M. V., Clarke, D. J. B., Evangelista, J. E., Jenkins, S. L., Lachmann, A., Wojciechowicz, M. L., Kropiwnicki, E., Jagodnik, K. M., et al. (2021) · Current Protocols · doi:10.1002/cpz1.90 · Cited by 3,451
23andMe Research Team, Lee, J. J., COGENT (Cognitive Genomics Consortium), Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Wedow, R., Okbay, A., Kong, E., Maghzian, O., Zacher, M., Nguyen-Viet, T. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3 · Cited by 2,470
A living biobank of breast cancer organoids captures disease heterogeneity
Sachs, N., de Ligt, J., Kopper, O., Gogola, E., Bounova, G., Weeber, F., Balgobind, A. V., Wind, K., Gracanin, A., Begthel, H., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.010 · Cited by 1,973
PANTHER : Making genome‐scale phylogenetics accessible to all
Thomas, P. D., Ebert, D., Muruganujan, A., Mushayahama, T., Albou, L., & Mi, H. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4218 · Cited by 2,010
Self-citationMi, H., Huang, X., Muruganujan, A., Tang, H., Mills, C., Kang, D., & Thomas, P. D. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1138 · Cited by 1,874
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Casagrande, J. T., & Thomas, P. D.
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2013-07-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1551-1566
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- OpenAlex
- W1965917470
- Cited by
- 2,466
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 62.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nprot.2013.092
- The paper
- Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Casagrande, J. T., & Thomas, P. D. (2013). Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
