Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,797

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics

Tyanova, Stefka, Temu, Tikira, Cox, Juergen·2016·Nature Protocols

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2016.136

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Hein, M.Y., Sharma, K., Cox, J. & Mann, M. in Handbook of Systems Biology (eds. Walhout, A.J.M., Vidal, M. & Dekker, J.) 3–25 (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2013). · DOI
  2. Cox, J. & Mann, M. Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 273–299 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Neuhauser, N., Michalski, A., Cox, J. & Mann, M. Expert system for computer-assisted annotation of MS/MS spectra. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 1500–1509 (2012). · DOI
  4. Tyanova, S. et al. Visualization of LC–MS/MS proteomics data in MaxQuant. Proteomics 15, 1453–1456 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cox, J. & Mann, M. Computational principles of determining and improving mass precision and accuracy for proteome measurements in an Orbitrap. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20, 1477–1485 (2009). · DOI
  6. Cox, J., Michalski, A. & Mann, M. Software lock mass by two-dimensional minimization of peptide mass errors. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 22, 1373–1380 (2011). · DOI
  7. Cox, J. et al. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1794–1805 (2011). · DOI
  8. Olsen, J.V. et al. Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis. Nat. Methods 4, 709–712 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Michalski, A., Neuhauser, N., Cox, J. & Mann, M. A systematic investigation into the nature of tryptic HCD spectra. J. Proteome Res. 11, 5479–5491 (2012). · DOI
  10. Mikesh, L.M. et al. The utility of ETD mass spectrometry in proteomic analysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1764, 1811–1822 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Frese, C.K. et al. Unambiguous phosphosite localization using electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD). J. Proteome Res. 12, 1520–1525 (2013). · DOI
  12. Spivak, M., Weston, J., Bottou, L., Kall, L. & Noble, W.S. Improvements to the percolator algorithm for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets. J. Proteome Res. 8, 3737–3745 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Tyanova, S., Mann, M. & Cox, J. MaxQuant for in-depth analysis of large SILAC datasets. Methods Mol. Biol. 1188, 351–364 (2014). · DOI
  14. Boersema, P.J., Raijmakers, R., Lemeer, S., Mohammed, S. & Heck, A.J. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 4, 484–494 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Thompson, A. et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75, 1895–1904 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Imamura, H., Wakabayashi, M. & Ishihama, Y. Analytical strategies for shotgun phosphoproteomics: status and prospects. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 836–842 (2012). · DOI
  17. Zhou, H. et al. Enhancing the identification of phosphopeptides from putative basophilic kinase substrates using Ti (IV) based IMAC enrichment. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, M110 006452 (2011). · DOI
  18. Sharma, K. et al. Ultradeep human phosphoproteome reveals a distinct regulatory nature of tyr and ser/thr-based signaling. Cell Rep. 8, 1583–1594 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Savitski, M.M., Nielsen, M.L. & Zubarev, R.A. ModifiComb, a new proteomic tool for mapping substoichiometric post-translational modifications, finding novel types of modifications, and fingerprinting complex protein mixtures. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 935–948 (2006). · DOI
  20. Chick, J.M. et al. A mass-tolerant database search identifies a large proportion of unassigned spectra in shotgun proteomics as modified peptides. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 743–749 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Neuhauser, N. et al. High performance computational analysis of large-scale proteome data sets to assess incremental contribution to coverage of the human genome. J. Proteome Res. 12, 2858–2868 (2013). · DOI
  22. Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 9, 731–740 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Deeb, S.J. et al. Machine learning based classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients by their protein expression profiles. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 2947–2960 (2015). · DOI
  24. Cox, J. & Mann, M. 1D and 2D annotation enrichment: a statistical method integrating quantitative proteomics with complementary high-throughput data. BMC Bioinformatics 13 (Suppl. 16), S12 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Robles, M.S., Cox, J. & Mann, M. In-vivo quantitative proteomics reveals a key contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms to the circadian regulation of liver metabolism. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004047 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  26. Geiger, T., Cox, J. & Mann, M. Proteomics on an Orbitrap benchtop mass spectrometer using all-ion fragmentation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 2252–2261 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  27. MacLean, B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966–968 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Keshishian, H. et al. Multiplexed, quantitative workflow for sensitive biomarker discovery in plasma yields novel candidates for early myocardial injury. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 2375–2393 (2015). · DOI
  29. Chen, Z.A., Fischer, L., Cox, J. & Rappsilber, J. Quantitative cross-linking/mass spectrometry using isotope-labeled cross-linkers and MaxQuant. Mol. Cell. Proteomics (2016). · DOI
  30. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646–4658 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Olsen, J.V. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 3, ra3 (2010). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 4,797

Metadata

Authors
Tyanova, S., Temu, T., & Cox, J.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2016-10-27
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
2301-2319
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2544360569
Cited by
4,797
References
14
FWCI
86.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nprot.2016.136
The paper
Tyanova, S., Temu, T., & Cox, J. (2016). The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nature Protocols. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.136

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.