CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8,803

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data

Tyanova, Stefka, Temu, Tikira, Sinitcyn, Pavel, Carlson, Arthur, Hein, Marco Y, Geiger, Tamar, Mann, Matthias, Cox, Jürgen·2016·Nature Methods
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.3901
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.3901

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significance in the mass spectrometry analysis was determined by permutation-based FDR statistics with the s0 factor iteratively modified to exclude all identifications enriched in the control experiment, yielding an s0 of 1 at 1% FDR.

    “Significance was determined by permutation-based FDR statistics122 where the s0 factor was iteratively modified to exclude all identifications enriched in the control experiment, yielding an s0 of 1 at 1% FDR.”

    From Structure of the endosomal Commander complex linked to Ritscher-Schinzel syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Altelaar, A.F., Munoz, J. & Heck, A.J. Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 35–48 (2013). · DOI
  2. Cox, J. & Mann, M. Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 273–299 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Eng, J.K., McCormack, A.L. & Yates, J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994). This publication describes the earliest approach to correlating tandem mass spectra of peptides to theoretical fragment-ion series calculated from in silico digests of known protein sequences with the aim of identifying peptides and proteins. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Perkins, D.N., Pappin, D.J., Creasy, D.M. & Cottrell, J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567 (1999). · DOI
  5. Geer, L.Y. et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 3, 958–964 (2004). · DOI
  6. Craig, R. & Beavis, R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20, 1466–1467 (2004). · DOI
  7. Bern, M., Cai, Y. & Goldberg, D. Lookup peaks: a hybrid of de novo sequencing and database search for protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 79, 1393–1400 (2007). · DOI
  8. Craig, R., Cortens, J.P. & Beavis, R.C. Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. J. Proteome Res. 3, 1234–1242 (2004). · DOI
  9. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Vitek, O. & Aebersold, R. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 787–797 (2007). · DOI
  10. Deutsch, E.W. et al. Trans-Proteomic Pipeline, a standardized data processing pipeline for large-scale reproducible proteomics informatics. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 9, 745–754 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008). Perseus has been developed in conjunction with MaxQuant, which comprises a complete quantitative workflow for the analysis of shotgun proteomics data, including support for a large variety of experimental techniques. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Vizcaino, J.A. et al. The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D1063–D1069 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Vizcaíno, J.A. et al. ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 223–226 (2014). · DOI
  14. Munoz, J. et al. The quantitative proteomes of human-induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 550 (2011). · DOI
  15. Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, yermed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 2513–2526 (2014). Here the MaxLFQ algorithm for relative label-free protein quantification is described. It enabled many researchers to conduct large proteomics studies with complex experimental designs without the need for labeling their samples. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Geiger, T., Cox, J., Ostasiewicz, P., Wisniewski, J.R. & Mann, M. Super-SILAC mix for quantitative proteomics of human tumor tissue. Nat. Methods 7, 383–385 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Tusher, V.G., Tibshirani, R. & Chu, G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116–5121 (2001). A pioneering method is described for the robust detection of significantly changing biomolecules in large omics data sets. It uses repeated permutations of the data to determine FDRs. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Alter, O., Brown, P.O. & Botstein, D. Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing and modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10101–10106 (2000). · DOI
  19. Huber, W. et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat. Methods 12, 115–121 (2015). · DOI
  20. Cox, J. et al. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1794–1805 (2011). · DOI
  21. Olsen, J.V. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 3, ra3 (2010). · DOI
  22. Sharma, K. et al. Ultradeep human phosphoproteome reveals a distinct regulatory nature of Tyr and Ser/Thr-based signaling. Cell Rep. 8, 1583–1594 (2014). · DOI
  23. Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1049–D1056 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hornbeck, P.V. et al. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D512–D520 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Tyanova, S., Cox, J., Olsen, J., Mann, M. & Frishman, D. Phosphorylation variation during the cell cycle scales with structural propensities of proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002842 (2013). · DOI
  26. Hein, M.Y. et al. A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organized by stoichiometries and abundances. Cell 163, 712–723 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hubner, N.C. et al. Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions. J. Cell Biol. 189, 739–754 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Selbach, M. & Mann, M. Protein interaction screening by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK). Nat. Methods 3, 981–983 (2006). · DOI
  29. Keilhauer, E.C., Hein, M.Y. & Mann, M. Accurate protein complex retrieval by affinity enrichment mass spectrometry (AE-MS) rather than affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS). Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 120–135 (2015). · DOI
  30. Räschle, M. et al. DNA repair. Proteomics reveals dynamic assembly of repair complexes during bypass of DNA cross-links. Science 348, 1253671 (2015). · DOI
  31. Spellman, P.T. et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3273–3297 (1998). · DOI
  32. Gauthier, N.P. et al. Cyclebase.org—a comprehensive multi-organism online database of cell-cycle experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D854–D859 (2008). · DOI
  33. Eser, P. et al. Periodic mRNA synthesis and degradation co-operate during cell cycle gene expression. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 717 (2014). · DOI
  34. Partch, C.L., Green, C.B. & Takahashi, J.S. Molecular architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 90–99 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Robles, M.S., Cox, J. & Mann, M. In vivo quantitative proteomics reveals a key contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms to the circadian regulation of liver metabolism. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004047 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Aviner, R., Shenoy, A., Elroy-Stein, O. & Geiger, T. Uncovering hidden layers of cell cycle regulation through integrative multi-omic analysis. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005554 (2015). · DOI
  38. Yates, A. et al. Ensembl 2016. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D710–D716 (2016). · DOI
  39. Cox, J. & Mann, M. 1D and 2D annotation enrichment: a statistical method integrating quantitative proteomics with complementary high-throughput data. BMC Bioinformatics 13, S12 (2012). · DOI
  40. Deeb, S.J. et al. Machine learning-based classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients by their protein expression profiles. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 2497–2460 (2015). · DOI
  41. Iglesias-Gato, D. et al. The proteome of primary prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 69, 942–952 (2016). · DOI
  42. Tyanova, S. et al. Proteomic maps of breast cancer subtypes. Nat Commun. 7, 10259 (2016). · DOI
  43. Vapnik, V.N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (Springer, 1995). · DOI · Paper page
  44. Ideker, T. & Krogan, N.J. Differential network biology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 565 (2012). · DOI
  45. Creixell, P. et al. Pathway and network analysis of cancer genomes. Nat. Methods 12, 615–621 (2015). · DOI
  46. Angermann, B.R. et al. Computational modeling of cellular signaling processes embedded into dynamic spatial contexts. Nat. Methods 9, 283–289 (2012). · DOI
  47. Cowan, A.E., Moraru, II., Schaff, J.C., Slepchenko, B.M. & Loew, L.M. Spatial modeling of cell signaling networks. Methods Cell Biol. 110, 195–221 (2012). · DOI
  48. Croft, D. et al. The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D472–D477 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D457–D462 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Tyanova, S. et al. Visualization of LC-MS/MS proteomics data in MaxQuant. Proteomics 15, 1453–1456 (2015). · DOI
  51. Ihaka, R. & Gentleman, R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5, 299–314 (1996). · DOI
  52. Troyanskaya, O. et al. Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics 17, 520–525 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Liew, A.W., Law, N.F. & Yan, H. Missing value imputation for gene expression data: computational techniques to recover missing data from available information. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 498–513 (2011). · DOI
  54. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D204–D212 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Hosp, F. et al. A double-barrel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) system to quantify 96 interactomes per day. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14, 2030–2041 (2015). · DOI
  56. Stingele, S. et al. Global analysis of genome, transcriptome and proteome reveals the response to aneuploidy in human cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 608 (2012). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tyanova, S., Temu, T., Sinitcyn, P., Carlson, A., Hein, M. Y., Geiger, T., Mann, M., & Cox, J.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Methods
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-06-27
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
731-740
ISSN
  • 1548-7091
  • 1548-7105
DOI
10.1038/nmeth.3901
Cited by
8,803
References
20
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review