Cited by 236Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research StudiesLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Treating ALK-positive lung cancer—early successes and future challenges

Open access
Camidge, D. Ross, Doebele, Robert C.·2012·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene occur infrequently in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but provide an important paradigm for oncogene-directed therapy in this disease. Crizotinib, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of ALK, provides significant benefit for patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC in association with characteristic, mostly mild, toxic effects, and this drug has been approved by the FDA for clinical use in this molecularly defined subgroup of lung cancer. Many new ALK inhibitors are being developed and understanding the challenges of determining and addressing the adverse effects that are likely to be ALK specific, while maximizing the time of benefit on targeted agents, and understanding the mechanisms that underlie drug resistance will be critical in the future for informing the optimal therapy of ALK+ NSCLC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.43

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camidge, D. R., & Doebele, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Camidge, D. Ross
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-04-03
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
268-277
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W2040317578
Cited by
236
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K12CA086913)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer, crizotinib, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ALK inhibitors, drug resistance mechanisms, targeted therapy, ALK rearrangement
MeSH terms
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Disease Management, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review