Cited by 862Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Acquired resistance to TKIs in solid tumours: learning from lung cancer

Camidge, D. Ross, Pao, William, Sequist, Lecia V.·2014·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

The use of advanced molecular profiling to direct the use of targeted therapy, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), has revolutionized the treatment of this disease. However, acquired resistance, defined as progression after initial benefit, to targeted therapies inevitably occurs. This Review explores breakthroughs in the understanding and treatment of acquired resistance in NSCLC, focusing on EGFR mutant and ALK rearrangement-positive disease, which may be relevant across multiple different solid malignancies with oncogene-addicted subtypes. Mechanisms of acquired resistance may be pharmacological (that is, failure of delivery of the drug to its target) or biological, resulting from evolutionary selection on molecularly diverse tumours. A number of clinical approaches can maintain control of the disease in the acquired resistance setting, including the use of radiation to treat isolated areas of progression and adding or switching to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Furthermore, novel approaches that have already proven successful include the development of second-generation and third-generation inhibitors and the combination of some of these inhibitors with antibodies directed against the same target. With our increased understanding of the spectrum of acquired resistance, major changes in how we conduct clinical research in this setting are now underway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.104

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camidge, D. R., Pao, W., & Sequist, L. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Camidge, D. Ross
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
473-481
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W1990013637
Cited by
862
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 98 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
acquired drug resistance, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, ALK rearrangement, oncogene addiction, solid tumors, second-generation TKIs, third-generation TKIs, antibody-drug conjugates, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, molecular profiling, tumor evolution
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Protein Kinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review