The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cornerstones of CRISPR–Cas in drug discovery and therapy
Open accessAbstract
The recent development of CRISPR–Cas systems as easily accessible and programmable tools for genome editing and regulation is spurring a revolution in biology. Paired with the rapid expansion of reference and personalized genomic sequence information, technologies based on CRISPR–Cas are enabling nearly unlimited genetic manipulation, even in previously difficult contexts, including human cells. Although much attention has focused on the potential of CRISPR–Cas to cure Mendelian diseases, the technology also holds promise to transform the development of therapies to treat complex heritable and somatic disorders. In this Review, we discuss how CRISPR–Cas can affect the next generation of drugs by accelerating the identification and validation of high-value targets, uncovering high-confidence biomarkers and developing differentiated breakthrough therapies. We focus on the promises, pitfalls and hurdles of this revolutionary gene-editing technology, discuss key aspects of different CRISPR–Cas screening platforms and offer our perspectives on the best practices in genome engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Self-citationMultiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11412 · Cited by 12,129
Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Wright, J., Agarwala, V., Scott, D. A., & Zhang, F. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · Cited by 11,133
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11252 · Cited by 8,499
The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity
Barretina, J., Caponigro, G., Stransky, N., Venkatesan, K., Margolin, A. A., Kim, S., Wilson, C. J., Lehár, J., Kryukov, G. V., Sonkin, D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11003 · Cited by 7,950
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235122 · Cited by 7,863
Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07385 · Cited by 7,735
The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258096 · Cited by 7,062
Self-citation
Cited by
Meyers, R. M., Bryan, J. G., McFarland, J. M., Weir, B. A., Sizemore, A. E., Xu, H., Dharia, N. V., Montgomery, P. G., Cowley, G. S., Pantel, S., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3984 · Cited by 1,952
Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it?
Sun, D., Gao, W., Hu, H., & Zhou, S. (2022) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.002 · Cited by 1,763
The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond
Adli, M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04252-2 · Cited by 1,545
CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering
Knott, G. J., & Doudna, J. A. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat5011 · Cited by 1,410
Self-citationOpportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective
Moffat, J. G., Vincent, F., Lee, J. A., Eder, J., & Prunotto, M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.111 · Cited by 939
Zheng, J., Haberland, V., Baird, D., Walker, V., Haycock, P., Hurle, M., Gutteridge, A., Erola, P., Liu, Y., Luo, S., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/627398 · Cited by 812
Advances in the delivery of RNA therapeutics: from concept to clinical reality
Kaczmarek, J. C., Kowalski, P. S., & Anderson, D. G. (2017) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0450-0 · Cited by 656
Receptor-Mediated Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 Endonuclease for Cell-Type-Specific Gene Editing
Rouet, R., Thuma, B. A., Roy, M. D., Lintner, N. G., Rubitski, D. M., Finley, J. E., Wisniewska, H. M., Mendonsa, R., Hirsh, A., de Oñate, L., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b01551 · Cited by 163
Self-citationDetection of Deleterious On-Target Effects after HDR-Mediated CRISPR Editing
Weisheit, I., Kroeger, J. A., Malik, R., Klimmt, J., Crusius, D., Dannert, A., Dichgans, M., & Paquet, D. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107689 · Cited by 125
Applications of tumor chip technology
Hachey, S. J., & Hughes, C. C. W. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00330k · Cited by 128
Extension of the crRNA enhances Cpf1 gene editing in vitro and in vivo
Park, H. M., Liu, H., Wu, J., Chong, A., Mackley, V., Fellmann, C., Rao, A., Jiang, F., Chu, H., Murthy, N., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05641-3 · Cited by 102
Self-citationIn vivo locus-specific editing of the neuroepigenome
Yim, Y. Y., Teague, C. D., & Nestler, E. J. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0334-y · Cited by 76
Schleidgen, S., Dederer, H.-G., Sgodda, S., Cravcisin, S., Lüneburg, L., Cantz, T., & Heinemann, T. (2020) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-020-00487-1 · Cited by 43
crisprSQL: a novel database platform for CRISPR/Cas off-target cleavage assays
Störtz, F., & Minary, P. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa885 · Cited by 37
Salman, A., Kantor, A., McClements, M. E., Marfany, G., Trigueros, S., & MacLaren, R. E. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14091842 · Cited by 37
Evasion of Pre-Existing Immunity to Cas9: A Prerequisite for Successful Genome Editing In Vivo?
Wignakumar, T., & Fairchild, P. J. (2019) · Current Transplantation Reports · doi:10.1007/s40472-019-00237-2 · Cited by 19
You-on-a-chip’ for precision medicine
Low, L. A., & Tagle, D. A. (2018) · Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development · doi:10.1080/23808993.2018.1456333 · Cited by 18
BoostMEC: predicting CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiency through boosting models
Zarate, O. A., Yang, Y., Wang, X., & Wang, J.-P. (2022) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04998-z · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Fellmann, C., Gowen, B. G., Lin, P.-C., Doudna, J. A., & Corn, J. E.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
- Published
- 2016-12-23
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-100
- ISSN
- 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1784
- OpenAlex
- W2565920990
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
