Cited by 37CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

crisprSQL: a novel database platform for CRISPR/Cas off-target cleavage assays

Open access
Störtz, Florian, Minary, Peter·2021·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

With ongoing development of the CRISPR/Cas programmable nuclease system, applications in the area of in vivo therapeutic gene editing are increasingly within reach. However, non-negligible off-target effects remain a major concern for clinical applications. Even though a multitude of off-target cleavage datasets have been published, a comprehensive, transparent overview tool has not yet been established. Here, we present crisprSQL (http://www.crisprsql.com), an interactive and bioinformatically enhanced collection of CRISPR/Cas9 off-target cleavage studies aimed at enriching the fields of cleavage profiling, gene editing safety analysis and transcriptomics. The current version of crisprSQL contains cleavage data from 144 guide RNAs on 25,632 guide-target pairs from human and rodent cell lines, with interaction-specific references to epigenetic markers and gene names. The first curated database of this standard, it promises to enhance safety quantification research, inform experiment design and fuel development of computational off-target prediction algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkaa885

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Störtz, F., & Minary, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK
Corresponding author
Störtz, Florian
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2020-10-21
Volume
49
Issue
D1
Pages
D855-D861
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W3093632917
Cited by
37
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M011224/1, BB/S507593/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, off-target cleavage, database platform, guide RNA, gene editing safety, transcriptomics, epigenetic modifications, off-target prediction, therapeutic gene editing
MeSH terms
Biological Assay, Streptococcus pyogenes, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Genetic, Epigenesis, Genetic, DNA Cleavage, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review