The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Needles in stacks of needles: finding disease-causal variants in a wealth of genomic data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq
Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L., & Wold, B. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1226 · Cited by 13,696
A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.
Adzhubei, I. A., Schmidt, S., Peshkin, L., Ramensky, V. E., Gerasimova, A., Bork, P., Kondrashov, A. S., & Sunyaev, S. R. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · Cited by 13,194
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09534 · Cited by 7,877
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons.
Rothman, K. J. (1990) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199001000-00010 · Cited by 5,965
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 1×
“Importantly, the dichotomy between near universal assumptions of ignorance 115 or knowledge 116 is a false one.”
Cited by
A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants
Kircher, M., Witten, D. M., Jain, P., O'Roak, B. J., Cooper, G. M., & Shendure, J. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2892 · Cited by 6,183
Self-citationCADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome
Rentzsch, P., Witten, D., Cooper, G. M., Shendure, J., & Kircher, M. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1016 · Cited by 3,534
Self-citationPredicting the Functional Effect of Amino Acid Substitutions and Indels
Choi, Y., Sims, G. E., Murphy, S., Miller, J. R., & Chan, A. P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046688 · Cited by 2,890
A landscape of driver mutations in melanoma
Hodis, E., Watson, I. R., Kryukov, G. V., Arold, S. T., Imielinski, M., Theurillat, J.-P., Nickerson, E., Auclair, D., Li, L., Place, C., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.024 · Cited by 2,610
PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels
Choi, Y., & Chan, A. P. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv195 · Cited by 2,549
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, G. M., & Shendure, J.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Genetics
- Published
- 2011-08-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 628-640
- ISSN
- 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0064
- OpenAlex
- W2054185647
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Needles in stacks of needles: finding disease-causal variants in a wealth of genomic data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrg3046
- The paper
- Cooper, G. M., & Shendure, J. (2011). Needles in stacks of needles: finding disease-causal variants in a wealth of genomic data. Nature Reviews Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
