Cited by 11Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Mouse ENCODE

Stower, Hannah·2012·Nature Reviews Genetics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrg3341

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Normalized TAD coverage across single-cell dataset reflects strong correlation between domains previously annotated as early- or late-replicating in mouse ESCs.

    “we found normalized TAD coverage across the single-cell dataset reflects a strong correlation between domains previously annotated as early- or late-replicating in mouse ESCs15”
  • Pseudo-compartments are characterized by a gradient of epigenetic signatures.

    “Analysis of RNA-seq, histone marks15 and Lamin association17 suggested pseudo-compartments are characterized by a gradient of epigenetic signatures”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stower, H.
Corresponding author
Stower, Hannah
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2012-09-18
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
675-675
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2084216324
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
mouse genome, DNA elements, regulatory elements, chromatin accessibility, epigenetic modifications, non-coding DNA, functional genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review