Towards a more comprehensive concept for prebiotics
Abstract
The essential role of the gut microbiota for health has generated tremendous interest in modulating its composition and metabolic function. One of these strategies is prebiotics, which typically refer to selectively fermented nondigestible food ingredients or substances that specifically support the growth and/or activity of health-promoting bacteria that colonize the gastrointestinal tract. In this Perspective, we argue that advances in our understanding of diet-microbiome-host interactions challenge important aspects of the current concept of prebiotics, and especially the requirement for effects to be 'selective' or 'specific'. We propose to revise this concept in an effort to shift the focus towards ecological and functional features of the microbiota more likely to be relevant for host physiology. This revision would provide a more rational basis for the identification of prebiotic compounds, and a framework by which the therapeutic potential of modulating the gut microbiota could be more fully materialized.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prebiotics do not always change the composition and activity of the gut microbiota in a selective and predictable manner.
“Importantly, prebiotics do not always change the composition and activity of the gut microbiota in a selective and predictable manner (Bindels et al., 2015).”
From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Bindels et al., 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 104 · Cited by 914
- Authors
- Bindels, L. B., Delzenne, N. M., Cani, P. D., & Walter, J.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Walter, Jens
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Published
- 2015-03-31
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 303-310
- ISSN
- 1759-5045 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-5053
- OpenAlex
- W2010037234
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 28
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Keywords
- prebiotics, gut microbiota, microbiota modulation, selective fermentation, health-promoting bacteria, host physiology
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Humans, Prebiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review