The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics
Open accessAbstract
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was proposed in 1998 as a portable sequence-based method for identifying clonal relationships among bacteria. Today, in the whole-genome era of microbiology, the need for systematic, standardized descriptions of bacterial genotypic variation remains a priority. Here, to meet this need, we draw on the successes of MLST and 16S rRNA gene sequencing to propose a hierarchical gene-by-gene approach that reflects functional and evolutionary relationships and catalogues bacteria 'from domain to strain'. Our gene-based typing approach using online platforms such as the Bacterial Isolate Genome Sequence Database (BIGSdb) allows the scalable organization and analysis of whole-genome sequence data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Smith, J. M., Smith, N. H., O'Rourke, M., & Spratt, B. G. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384 · Cited by 1,802
Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C. J., Snel, B., & Bork, P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123061 · Cited by 1,663
Comparative genomics: the bacterial pan-genome
Tettelin, H., Riley, D., Cattuto, C., & Medini, D. (2008) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.006 · Cited by 1,120
Cited by
Jolley, K. A., Bray, J. E., & Maiden, M. C. J. (2018) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1 · Cited by 3,551
Self-citation(2019) · doi:10.1101/gr.251678.119 · Cited by 976
Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes
Moura, A., Criscuolo, A., Pouseele, H., Maury, M. M., Leclercq, A., Tarr, C., Björkman, J. T., Dallman, T., Reimer, A., Enouf, V., et al. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.185 · Cited by 668
Carvalho, M. J., Sands, K., Thomson, K., Portal, E., Mathias, J., Milton, R., Gillespie, D., Dyer, C., Akpulu, C., Boostrom, I., et al. (2022) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-022-01184-y · Cited by 95
New Insights into the Diversity of the Genus Faecalibacterium
Benevides, L., Burman, S., Martin, R., Robert, V., Thomas, M., Miquel, S., Chain, F., Sokol, H., Bermudez-Humaran, L. G., Morrison, M., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01790 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Maiden, M. C. J., van Rensburg, M. J. J., Bray, J. E., Earle, S. G., Ford, S. A., Jolley, K. A., & McCarthy, N. D.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Microbiology
- Published
- 2013-09-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 728-736
- ISSN
- 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-1534
- OpenAlex
- W2032142842
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrmicro3093
- The paper
- Maiden, M. C. J., van Rensburg, M. J. J., Bray, J. E., Earle, S. G., Ford, S. A., Jolley, K. A., & McCarthy, N. D. (2013). MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics. Nature Reviews Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
