Cited by 279Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 153 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From nerve net to nerve ring, nerve cord and brain — evolution of the nervous system

Arendt, Detlev, Tosches, Maria Antonietta, Marlow, Heather·2016·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

The puzzle of how complex nervous systems emerged remains unsolved. Comparative studies of neurodevelopment in cnidarians and bilaterians suggest that this process began with distinct integration centres that evolved on opposite ends of an initial nerve net. The 'apical nervous system' controlled general body physiology, and the 'blastoporal nervous system' coordinated feeding movements and locomotion. We propose that expansion, integration and fusion of these centres gave rise to the bilaterian nerve cord and brain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn.2015.15

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 153 references

1 of the 153 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hertwig, O. & Hertwig, R. Studien zur Blättertheorie. Heft 1: Die Actinien (Gustav Fischer, 1879).
  2. Haeckel, E. Die Gastraea-Theorie, die phylogenetische Classification des Thierreiches und die Homologie der Keimblätter. Jena Z. Naturwiss. 8, 1–55 (in German) (1874).
  3. Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. Invertebrates (Sinauer Associates, 2003).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 277

Metadata

Authors
Arendt, D., Tosches, M. A., & Marlow, H.
Affiliations
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (DE)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Arendt, Detlev
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2015-12-17
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
61-72
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2219074388
Cited by
279
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
nervous system evolution, nerve net, nerve ring, nerve cord, brain evolution, gene expression comparison
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Nerve Net, Nervous System, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review