Slow-wave sleep takes the leading role in memory reorganization
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sleep, and particularly SWS, has been likewise identified as a factor critically involved in the formation of long-term memories in the neurobehavioral domain.
“It is important to note here that sleep, and particularly SWS, has been likewise identified as a factor critically involved in the formation of long-term memories in the neurobehavioral domain (292).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [292]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 177
- Authors
- Diekelmann, S., & Born, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- ORCID
- Diekelmann, Susanne
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 218-218
- ISSN
- 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2057956226
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- slow-wave sleep, memory consolidation, memory reorganization, memory reconsolidation, hippocampal replay, acetylcholine, cholinergic modulation, sleep-dependent memory, memory updating, memory interference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
