Cited by 368Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMuscle activation and electromyography studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 195 of the 197 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges

Open access
Bensmaia, Sliman J., Miller, Lee E.·2014·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

The loss of a limb or paralysis resulting from spinal cord injury has devastating consequences on quality of life. One approach to restoring lost sensory and motor abilities in amputees and patients with tetraplegia is to supply them with implants that provide a direct interface with the CNS. Such brain–machine interfaces might enable a patient to exert voluntary control over a prosthetic or robotic limb or over the electrically induced contractions of paralysed muscles. A parallel interface could convey sensory information about the consequences of these movements back to the patient. Recent developments in the algorithms that decode motor intention from neuronal activity and in approaches to convey sensory feedback by electrically stimulating neurons, using biomimetic and adaptation-based approaches, have shown the promise of invasive interfaces with sensorimotor cortices, although substantial challenges remain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn3724

Cites

195 of 195 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 197 references

2 of the 197 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Johannes, M. S. et al. An overview of the developmental process for the modular prosthetic limb. Johns Hopkins Apl. Tech. Digest 30, 207–216 (2011).
  2. Malarkey, E. & Parpura, V. in Brain Edema XIV Vol. 106 Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum (eds Czernicki, Z. et al.) 337–341 (Springer, 2010).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 367

Metadata

Authors
Bensmaia, S. J., & Miller, L. E.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Lee E.
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
313-325
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2074613775
Cited by
368
References
197
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 9
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns048845-09)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (082865)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-048845, R01-NS-048845, R01NS082865, R01NS053603, #NS053603)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
sensorimotor cortex, prosthetic control, tetraplegia, spinal cord injury, amputation, motor intention decoding, sensory feedback, electrical stimulation of neurons
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Electric Stimulation, Humans, Movement, Paralysis, User-Computer Interface, Prostheses and Implants, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review