Cited by 3,093Enzyme Structure and FunctionResearch Data Management PracticesProtein Structure and Dynamics

Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank

Open access
Berman, Helen, Henrick, Kim, Nakamura, Haruki·2003·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nsb1203-980

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For certain types of important digital objects, there are well-curated, deeply-integrated, special-purpose repositories such as Genbank, wwPDB, UniProt, SPDF, and SIMBAD.

    “For certain types of important digital objects, there are well-curated, deeply-integrated, special-purpose repositories such as Genbank3, Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB4), and UniProt5 in the life sciences; Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF; http://spdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/) and Set of Identifications, Measurements and Bibliography for Astronomical Data (SIMBAD6) in the space sciences.”
  • The VirB8-like protein-minibinder complex structure quality was assessed using MolProbity before deposition in the PDB.

    “Structure quality was assessed using Molprobity56 before deposition in the PDB82,83”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 4 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berman, H., Henrick, K., & Nakamura, H.
Affiliations
Institute for Protein Research, The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
Berman, Helen
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
980-980
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W1995808589
Cited by
3,093
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 155 · 2025: 212 · 2024: 266 · 2023: 274 · 2022: 238 · 2021: 240 · 2020: 208 · 2019: 217 · 2018: 141 · 2017: 138 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 103
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Wellcome Trust
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • European Commission
  • Japan Science and Technology Corporation
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
wwPDB, structural biology, data repositories, data curation
MeSH terms
Archives, International Agencies, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review