Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular mechanisms for protein-encoded inheritance

Open access
Wiltzius, Jed J W, Landau, Meytal, Nelson, Rebecca, Sawaya, Michael R, Apostol, Marcin I, Goldschmidt, Lukasz, Soriaga, Angela B, Cascio, Duilio, Rajashankar, Kanagalaghatta, Eisenberg, David·2009·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract

In prion inheritance and transmission, strains are phenotypic variants encoded by protein 'conformations'. However, it is unclear how a protein conformation can be stable enough to endure transmission between cells or organisms. Here we describe new polymorphic crystal structures of segments of prion and other amyloid proteins, which offer two structural mechanisms for the encoding of prion strains. In packing polymorphism, prion strains are encoded by alternative packing arrangements (polymorphs) of β-sheets formed by the same segment of a protein; in segmental polymorphism, prion strains are encoded by distinct β-sheets built from different segments of a protein. Both forms of polymorphism can produce enduring conformations capable of encoding strains. These molecular mechanisms for transfer of protein-encoded information into prion strains share features with the familiar mechanism for transfer of nucleic acid–encoded information into microbial strains, including sequence specificity and recognition by noncovalent bonds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nsmb.1643

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Wiltzius, J. J. W., Landau, M., Nelson, R., Sawaya, M. R., Apostol, M. I., Goldschmidt, L., Soriaga, A. B., Cascio, D., Rajashankar, K., & Eisenberg, D.
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2009-08-16
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
973-978
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W2155143852
Cited by
259
References
3
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.