Tissue- and age-specific DNA replication patterns at the CTG/CAG-expanded human myotonic dystrophy type 1 locus
Abstract
Myotonic dystrophy, caused by DM1 CTG/CAG repeat expansions, shows varying instability levels between tissues and across ages within patients. We determined DNA replication profiles at the DM1 locus in patient fibroblasts and tissues from DM1 transgenic mice of various ages showing different instability. In patient cells, the repeat is flanked by two replication origins demarcated by CTCF sites, with replication diminished at the expansion. In mice, the expansion replicated from only the downstream origin (CAG as lagging template). In testes from mice of three different ages, replication toward the repeat paused at the earliest age and was relieved at later ages-coinciding with increased instability. Brain, pancreas and thymus replication varied with CpG methylation at DM1 CTCF sites. CTCF sites between progressing forks and repeats reduced replication depending on chromatin. Thus, varying replication progression may affect tissue- and age-specific repeat instability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy.
“Our observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy (Brock et al., 1999; Cleary et al., 2010; Filippova et al., 2001; Libby et al., 2008; Sopher et al., 2011).”
From Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries (2018) · cites this paper as Cleary et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Cleary, J. D., Tomé, S., López Castel, A., Panigrahi, G. B., Foiry, L., Hagerman, K. A., Sroka, H., Chitayat, D., Gourdon, G., & Pearson, C. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Pearson, Christopher E
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2010-08-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1079-1087
- ISSN
- 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-9993
- OpenAlex
- W1991720664
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u54ns048843-12)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS48843)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- myotonic dystrophy type 1, trinucleotide repeat instability, replication origin activation, CpG methylation, chromatin, transgenic mouse model, fibroblasts, testis
- MeSH terms
- CCCTC-Binding Factor, Aging, Animals, Binding Sites, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19, DNA, DNA Replication, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Myotonic Dystrophy, Organ Specificity, Repressor Proteins, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Mice, Genetic Loci
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review