Cited by 259Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries

Open access
Sun, James H., Zhou, Linda, Emerson, Daniel J., Phyo, Sai A., Titus, Katelyn R., Gong, Wanfeng, Gilgenast, Thomas G., Beagan, Jonathan A. +3 more·2018·Cell

Abstract

Summary More than 25 inherited human disorders are caused by the unstable expansion of repetitive DNA sequences termed short tandem repeats (STRs). A fundamental unresolved question is why some STRs are susceptible to pathologic expansion, whereas thousands of repeat tracts across the human genome are relatively stable. Here, we discover that nearly all disease-associated STRs (daSTRs) are located at boundaries demarcating 3D chromatin domains. We identify a subset of boundaries with markedly higher CpG island density compared to the rest of the genome. daSTRs specifically localize to ultra-high-density CpG island boundaries, suggesting they might be hotspots for epigenetic misregulation or topological disruption upon STR expansion. Fragile X Syndrome patients exhibit severe boundary disruption in a manner that correlates with local loss of CTCF occupancy and the degree of FMR1 silencing. Our data uncover higher-order chromatin architecture as a new dimension in understanding repeat expansion disorders.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Nearly all disease-associated short tandem repeats (daSTRs) localize to 3D chromatin domain boundaries, especially boundaries with ultra-high CpG island density and high CTCF occupancy. In Fragile X syndrome, the FMR1 boundary is disrupted in patients, correlating with local CTCF loss and FMR1 silencing.

Key findings

  • 22 of 27 daSTR loci localized to human ES cell boundaries, including 11 at TAD boundaries and 11 at subTAD boundaries; 21 of 23 neurological daSTRs localized to boundaries in human fetal cortical plate tissue.
  • daSTRs were significantly closer to domain boundaries than matched normal-length repeats (0 bp versus 5,203 bp median; P = 0.00074 Mann-Whitney U; P = 0.0037 Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and enriched at boundaries (odds ratio = 4.77, Fisher’s exact P = 0.00056).
  • daSTRs localized to CpG island-rich boundaries more than matched repeats (odds ratio = 10.4, P = 1.4E-8), with 65.7% of daSTRs at CpG island-rich boundaries versus 22.0% of matched repeats; no significant difference was found at CpG island-depleted boundaries or non-boundary CpG islands.
  • In Fragile X syndrome patient samples, the FMR1 TAD boundary was ablated, a CTCF doublet ~100 kb upstream was lost, and boundary disruption correlated with FMR1 silencing; these topological changes occurred in at least three cell types and four patients.

Methods

  • Analyzed published Hi-C data from human ES cells and human fetal cortical plate tissue, using DI+HMM for Mb-scale TADs and 3DNetMod for nested subTADs; daSTRs were mapped in hg19 and compared with normal-length repeats matched by repeat sequence, length range, and gene body placement.
  • Performed 5C, CTCF ChIP-seq, qRT-PCR for FMR1 expression, and Sanger sequencing in Fragile X syndrome patient and control B-lymphocytes, fibroblasts, and postmortem brain tissue.
  • Used Fisher’s exact, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel, randomization, and bootstrapped tests to assess boundary localization and CpG island density.

Limitations

  • The paper states it does not aim to identify specific genetic variants predicting which individuals develop repeat expansion disorders, and that cause-and-effect relationships among boundary disruption, DNA methylation, CTCF occupancy, CpG islands, STR expansion, and gene expression remain unresolved.
  • The paper notes that statistical power was restricted by small daSTR class sizes, and that rigorous thresholds likely missed some visually evident boundaries, making boundary enrichment estimates conservative.
  • Evident from the text: the Fragile X syndrome topological analyses rely on a small number of patient samples and cell types, and the link between boundary disruption and FMR1 silencing is correlative rather than causal.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.005

Cites

66 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 56 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    daSTRs localize with boundaries exhibiting ultra-high CpG island density.

    “Importantly, daSTRs localize with boundaries exhibiting ultra-high CpG island density (blue spheres, Figure 4A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The small subTAD encompassing the FMR1 gene dissolves in the ~935 FXS patient compared to the healthy sibling.

    “Third, the small subTAD encompassing the FMR1 gene dissolves in the ~935 FXS patient compared to the healthy sibling (Figure 5B-C, lower green arrow).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Severe topological disruption around the FMR1 daSTR was observed in both FXS patient B cell lines compared to the healthy sibling with normal-length repeats.

    “We observed severe topological disruption around the FMR1 daSTR in both FXS patient B cell lines compared to the healthy sibling with normal-length repeats (Figure 5B-D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    8 out of the 23 neurological daSTR loci were detected at TAD boundaries in human fetal cortical plate tissue.

    “Consistent with our observations in human ES cells, we found 8 out of the 23 neurological daSTR loci were detected at TAD boundaries in human fetal cortical plate tissue (Figure 3A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    All four classes of daSTRs showed enrichment at boundaries compared to other normal-length repeats matched by sequence and gene body location.

    “Although statistical power was restricted by the small size of the groups, all four classes of daSTRs showed enrichment at boundaries compared to other normal-length repeats matched by sequence and gene body location (Figure S5A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 26
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    An additional 8 and 5 daSTRs localized to subTAD and qualitatively apparent boundaries, respectively, in human cortical tissue.

    “An additional 8 and 5 daSTRs localized to subTAD and qualitatively apparent boundaries, respectively (Figure 3B, Figure S4A-C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nearly all daSTRs are specifically targeted to CpG island-rich boundaries, but not boundaries devoid of CpG islands or CpG islands internal to domains.

    “We observed that nearly all daSTRs are specifically targeted to CpG island-rich boundaries, but not boundaries devoid of CpG islands or CpG islands internal to domains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There is a marked increase in the density of CpG islands at boundaries vs. non-boundaries, whereas classic repressive chromatin marks such as H3K9me3 were slightly depleted at boundaries compared to loci internal to domains.

    “Noteworthy, we also observed a marked increase in the density of CpG islands at boundaries vs. non-boundaries, whereas classic repressive chromatin marks such as H3K9me3 were slightly depleted at boundaries compared to loci internal to domains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Severe reduction of FMR1 expression was found in all FXS patient samples with boundary disruption, whereas boundaries remained intact if FMR1 was not silenced.

    “We found severe reduction of FMR1 expression in all FXS patient samples with boundary disruption, whereas boundaries remained intact if FMR1 was not silenced (Figure 6G-H, Figure S7I-K).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The CTCF doublet is located directly at the base of the upstream loop and TAD boundary; disruption of these structural features in FXS patients correlated with lost CTCF occupancy.

    “The CTCF doublet is located directly at the base of the upstream loop and TAD boundary; disruption of these structural features in FXS patients correlated with lost CTCF occupancy (Figure 6C-D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The specific long-range contacts between FMR1 and the downstream TAD were lost in FXS but not mediated by CTCF.

    “We also noticed that the specific long-range contacts between FMR1 and the downstream TAD were lost in FXS but not mediated by CTCF (Figure 6E, Figure S7G), suggesting that additional architectural proteins are affected by repeat expansion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The doublet CTCF sites contained CTCF motifs in the reverse orientation and looped to distal CTCF occupied motifs oriented in the forward direction.

    “Consistent with the established principles of CTCF motif convergency (Rao et al., 2014), the doublet CTCF sites contained CTCF motifs in the reverse orientation and looped to distal CTCF occupied motifs oriented in the forward direction (Figure 6C-D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rao et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There is increased density of H3K27ac+ putative enhancers in the downstream TAD and minimal H3K27ac+ signal in the TAD upstream of the FMR1 daSTR.

    “We found increased density of H3K27ac+ putative enhancers in the downstream TAD and minimal H3K27ac+ signal in the TAD upstream of the FMR1 daSTR (Figure 6I).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    FMR1 is biased towards downstream contacts (positive DI) in healthy individuals and transitions to upstream contacts (negative DI) in diseased individuals.

    “FMR1 is biased towards downstream contacts (positive DI) in healthy individuals and transitions to upstream contacts (negative DI) in diseased individuals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    CSTB was dropped from all analyses comparing daSTRs to matched normal-length repeats because there are no other repeats in hg19 matching its sequence, length, and gene body location requirements.

    “One final gene (CSTB) was queried for boundary localization but dropped from all analyses that compared daSTRs to matched, normal-length repeats because there are no other repeats matching its sequence, length, and gene body location requirements in hg19.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    TBP and NOP56 were dropped from analyses because they are located at the far edges of chromosomes beyond where Hi-C can query domains.

    “Of these 29, two (TBP, NOP56) were dropped from our analyses because they were located at the far edges of chromosomes beyond where Hi-C can query domains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Mammalian genomes are organized into a hierarchy of Megabase-scale topologically associating domains (TADs) and smaller, nested subTADs.

    “Mammalian genomes are organized into a hierarchy of Megabase (Mb)-scale topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012) and smaller, nested subTADs (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012; Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013; Rao et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dixon et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nora et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rao et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A small number of specific normal-length STRs undergo somatic or germline expansion and transition to intermediate, pre-mutation, and mutation repeat unit tract lengths.

    “By a process that is poorly understood, a small number of specific normal-length STRs undergo somatic or germline expansion and transition to intermediate, pre-mutation, and mutation (affected) repeat unit tract lengths (Mirkin, 2007; Pearson et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mirkin, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pearson et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Chromatin domains span >90% of the genome and are thought to create insulated neighborhoods demarcating the search space of specific long-range interactions between enhancers and their target genes.

    “Such chromatin domains span >90% of the genome and are thought to create insulated neighborhoods demarcating the search space of specific long-range interactions between enhancers and their target genes (Dowen et al., 2014; Narendra et al., 2015; Symmons et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dowen et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Narendra et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Symmons et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Normal-length STR tracts are generally stable across generations and among somatic tissues in the same individual.

    “Normal-length STR tracts are generally stable across generations and among somatic tissues in the same individual (McMurray, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McMurray, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    daSTRs consist predominantly of a trinucleotide unit, but expandable tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide repeat sequences have also been reported.

    “daSTRs consist predominantly of a trinucleotide unit, but expandable tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide repeat sequences have also been reported (Iyer et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Iyer et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Pre-mutation and mutation lengths vary widely among the repeat expansion disorders.

    “Pre-mutation and mutation lengths vary widely among the repeat expansion disorders (Iyer et al., 2015; McMurray, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Iyer et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McMurray, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Healthy individuals have tens of thousands of relatively short STR tracts distributed throughout their genomes.

    “Healthy individuals have tens of thousands of relatively short STR tracts distributed throughout their genomes (Gymrek and Erlich, 2013; Gymrek et al., 2016; Willems et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gymrek and Erlich, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gymrek et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Willems et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    daSTRs exhibit a wide range of repeat unit sequences and can be localized across the gene body in introns, exons, promoters and 3'/5' untranslated regions (UTRs).

    “daSTRs also exhibit a wide range of repeat unit sequences and can be localized across the gene body in introns, exons, promoters and 3’/5’ untranslated regions (UTRs) (La Spada and Taylor, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites La Spada and Taylor, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    daSTRs exhibit tremendous diversity in sequence, gene body location, and tract length.

    “Disease-associated STR tracts (hereafter referred to as daSTRs) exhibit tremendous diversity in sequence, gene body location, and tract length.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More than 25 inherited human disorders are caused by the unstable expansion of repetitive DNA sequences termed short tandem repeats (STRs).

    “More than 25 inherited human disorders are caused by the unstable expansion of repetitive DNA sequences termed short tandem repeats (STRs).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites La Spada and Taylor, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McMurray, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mirkin, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CpG islands are generally hypomethylated in normal somatic cells and can acquire aberrant hypermethylation in disease.

    “CpG islands are generally hypomethylated in normal somatic cells and can acquire aberrant hypermethylation in disease (Robertson, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Robertson, 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    daSTRs are present at boundaries in embryonic and somatic cell lineages and also in at least one stage of spermatogenesis when daSTR instability is paternally inherited.

    “Together, these results indicate that daSTRs are present at boundaries in embryonic and somatic cell lineages and also in at least one stage of spermatogenesis when daSTR instability is paternally inherited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The mutation-length CGG STR acquires DNA methylation, which is thought to cause FMR1 silencing.

    “The mutation-length CGG STR acquires DNA methylation, which is thought to cause FMR1 silencing (Park et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Park et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CpG islands are aberrantly hypermethylated in a subset of cancers that exhibit microsatellite instability.

    “Moreover, CpG islands are aberrantly hypermethylated in a subset of cancers that exhibit microsatellite instability (Sharma et al., 2010; You and Jones, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Sharma et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites You and Jones, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Boundary disruption results in a dramatic re-organization of genome topology around the FMR1 gene, such that it no longer contacts genomic loci in the downstream TAD marked by active enhancers and instead merges with the upstream TAD largely devoid of active enhancer marks.

    “This boundary disruption results in a dramatic re-organization of genome topology around the FMR1 gene, such that it no longer contacts genomic loci in the downstream TAD marked by histone modifications characteristic of active enhancers. Rather, FMR1 merges with the upstream TAD largely devoid of active enhancer marks, suggesting that the topological reconfiguration of the genome could be related”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Severe topological disruption at the FMR1 daSTR occurs in at least three cell types and at least four patients with FXS.

    “Together, these results reveal severe topological disruption at the FMR1 daSTR in at least three cell types and at least four patients with FXS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    FXS is caused by the loss of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) encoded by FMR1.

    “FXS is caused by the loss of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) encoded by FMR1 (Verkerk et al., 1991).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Verkerk et al., 1991 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    FMR1 is associated with the downstream TAD in healthy B cells and shifts to the upstream TAD in two patients with FXS.

    “These results demonstrate that FMR1 is associated with the downstream TAD in healthy B cells and shifts to the upstream TAD in two patients with FXS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In congenital myotonic dystrophy, the region flanking the DM1 gene is hypermethylated and this methylation disrupts binding of adjacent CTCF binding sites.

    “In congenital myotonic dystrophy, the region flanking the DM1 gene is hypermethylated and this methylation disrupts binding of adjacent CTCF binding sites (Filippova et al., 2001; Steinbach et al., 1998).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Filippova et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Steinbach et al., 1998 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The null distribution for randomization tests was created by taking 10,000 draws without replacement of n=26 matched repeats, with each draw proportionally matched to the daSTR group with respect to repeat unit sequence and gene body location.

    “The null distribution was created by taking 10,000 draws without replacement of n=26 matched repeats, where each draw is proportionally matched to the daSTR group with respect to repeat unit sequence and gene body location, and computing the test statistic each time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A total of 29 genes associated with trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders were initially selected for analysis based on previous reports.

    “A total of 29 genes associated with trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders were initially selected for analysis based on previous reports (Tables S1-S3) (Iyer et al., 2015; La Spada and Taylor, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Iyer et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites La Spada and Taylor, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The method of partitioning the genome into 120kb bins and removing boundary-overlapping, centromere, telomere, gene desert, and unqueryable bins ensures that non-boundary bins are not dominated by hard-to-query regions of the genome.

    “This method ensures that both boundaries and non-boundary bins are the same size, and that non-boundary bins are not dominated by hard to query regions of the genome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Boundaries at a specific daSTR in the FMR1 gene are disrupted in FXS in a manner that markedly alters the enhancer landscape accessible to the gene and correlates with the loss of CTCF occupancy and FMR1 silencing.

    “We discover that boundaries at a specific daSTR in the FMR1 gene are disrupted in FXS in a manner that markedly alters the enhancer landscape accessible to the gene and correlates with the loss of CTCF occupancy and FMR1 silencing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Raw 5C counts distributions were quantile normalized to address minor sequencing depth differences.

    “Raw 5C counts distributions were quantile normalized to address minor sequencing depth differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    To ensure that Fisher's Exact test results were not artifacts of using a null repeat set not weighted similarly to the daSTRs set with respect to STR type group, they randomly created n=1000 subsets of the null repeat set weighted similarly to the daSTRs and used the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test to calculate a pooled odds ratio.

    “To ensure that our results from the Fisher’s Exact test (Figure 2B, Figure 4D-F) were not artifacts of using a null repeat set that was not weighted similarly to the daSTRs set with respect to STR type group (Table S3), we also randomly created n=1000 subsets of the null repeat set that were weighted similarly to the daSTRs.”
    • Also stated in: § QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES · plain
      “We then used the Python StatsModel package implementation of the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test on the 1000 subsets to calculate a pooled odds ratio of the empirical distribution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A recent genome-wide association study in Huntington's disease patients identified a link between genetic variation in DNA repair machinery and the age of onset of the disease.

    “A recent genome-wide association study in Huntington’s disease patients identified a link between genetic variation in DNA repair machinery and the age of onset of the disease (Genetic Modifiers of Huntington's Disease, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Genetic Modifiers of Huntington's Disease, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    STR instability at CpG island-rich boundaries manifests in individuals already genetically pre-disposed to repeat expansion.

    “We posit that STR instability at CpG island-rich boundaries manifests in individuals already genetically pre-disposed to repeat expansion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent high-resolution Chromosome-Conformation-Capture sequencing studies have revealed that TAD boundaries are perturbed in rare human limb malformation diseases and certain types of cancers, leading to enhancer miswiring and pathogenic disruption of gene expression.

    “Recent high-resolution Chromosome-Conformation-Capture sequencing studies have revealed that TAD boundaries are perturbed in rare human limb malformation diseases (Lupianez et al., 2015) and certain types of cancers (Flavahan et al., 2016; Hnisz et al., 2016), leading to enhancer miswiring and pathogenic disruption of gene expression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lupianez et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Flavahan et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hnisz et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    STR instability is known to occur in the germline, but tissue-specific somatic variation in STR tract length has been reported.

    “STR instability is known to occur in the germline, but tissue-specific somatic variation in STR tract length has been reported (Leeflang et al., 1995; Telenius et al., 1994; Wohrle et al., 1993; Wong et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Leeflang et al., 1995 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Telenius et al., 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wohrle et al., 1993 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many other daSTRs are co-localized to subTAD boundaries, which are known to be dynamically reconfigured across cell state transitions in development.

    “By contrast, many other daSTRS are co-localized to subTAD boundaries, which are known to be dynamically reconfigured across cell state transitions in development (Norton et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Norton et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The method of partitioning the genome into 120kb bins and removing boundary-overlapping, centromere, telomere, gene desert, and unqueryable bins ensures that both boundaries and non-boundary bins are the same size.

    “This method ensures that both boundaries and non-boundary bins are the same size, and that non-boundary bins are not dominated by hard to query regions of the genome.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    daSTRs with similar sequence and gene body locations behave similarly with respect to number of repeats required for disease and expansion mechanisms.

    “These groups are motivated by prior literature showing that daSTRs with similar sequence and gene body locations behave similarly with respect to number of repeats required for disease and expansion mechanisms (Iyer et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Iyer et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The published Mb-scale TAD calls from Schmitt et al. (2016) were generated using an independent study and an independent TAD calling method.

    “We used these published Mb-scale TAD calls in Figure S2 because Ren and colleagues used an independent study and an independent TAD calling method to compare TADs across H1 ES cell (Human H1) and H1 ESC-derived lineages—mesendoderm (MES), mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), neural progenitor cells (NPC), and trophoblast-like cells (TRO).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmitt et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Restriction fragment biases were normalized by applying matrix balancing as previously reported.

    “Finally, restriction fragment biases were normalized by applying matrix balancing as previously reported (Imakaev et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Imakaev et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Mapped ChIP-seq reads were filtered to remove optical and PCR duplicates and downsampled to equivalent read numbers across cellular states to facilitate comparison of ChIP-seq libraries across cell types.

    “To facilitate the comparison of ChIPseq libraries across cell types, the mapped reads were filtered to remove optical and PCR duplicates and then downsampled to equivalent read numbers across cellular states.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The 120kb boundary size was chosen to address the resolution limit of the Hi-C assays (40 kb) used in this study.

    “The 120kb boundary size was chosen to address the resolution limit of the Hi-C assays, 40 kb, used in this study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Bootstrapped confidence intervals for percent of repeats at boundary and CpG island density were constructed by randomly selecting groups of 26 repeats from both the matched repeat set and the daSTRs 1,000 times with replacement.

    “Bootstrapped confidence intervals for percent of repeats at boundary and CpG island density were constructed by randomly selecting groups of 26 repeats from both the matched repeat set and the daSTRs 1,000 times with replacement and computing the percent of the randomly chosen repeats at a boundary in each sampling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
48 of 48
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The role for TAD boundaries in neurological disorders has not yet been reported.

    “but the role for TAD boundaries in neurological disorders has not yet been reported.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mapping daSTRs to normal-length repeat tracts in the hg19 reference genome is representative of disease-associated STR loci.

    “Because the samples are not diseased, we mapped daSTRs to the normal-length repeat tracts found in the hg19 reference genome (Tables S1-S3).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Domain boundaries called in human ES cells and fetal cortical plate are relevant to the cell types of pathology for all daSTRs.

    “Thus, although the target cell type(s) for many unstable repeat expansion disorders are unknown, the strong enrichment at boundaries regardless of tissue origin suggests that daSTR co-localization with boundaries might be robust across cell types relevant for the pathology.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Four daSTR classes account for only 25 of 26 tracts

    Minor

    The methods say that 26 daSTR tracts were subdivided into these four classes, but the listed class sizes sum to 25. One tract is unaccounted for.

    Reported 26 · recomputed 25

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, J. H., Zhou, L., Emerson, D. J., Phyo, S. A., Titus, K. R., Gong, W., Gilgenast, T. G., Beagan, J. A., Davidson, B. L., Tassone, F., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
175
Issue
1
Pages
224-238.e15
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889421335
Cited by
249
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 3
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The New York Stem Cell Foundation
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • NIH Director’s New Innovator Award (1DP2MH11024701)
  • 4D Nucleome Common Fund (1U01HL12999801)
  • NIH (R01 GM113929)
  • NSF-NIGMS (1562665)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
microsatellite markers, repeat expansion disorders, chromatin domain boundaries, CpG islands, fragile X syndrome, chromatin topology
MeSH terms
CCCTC-Binding Factor, Adult, Brain, Cell Line, Chromatin, Disease, DNA, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Genome, Human, Microsatellite Repeats, CpG Islands, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review