Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries
Open accessAbstract
Summary More than 25 inherited human disorders are caused by the unstable expansion of repetitive DNA sequences termed short tandem repeats (STRs). A fundamental unresolved question is why some STRs are susceptible to pathologic expansion, whereas thousands of repeat tracts across the human genome are relatively stable. Here, we discover that nearly all disease-associated STRs (daSTRs) are located at boundaries demarcating 3D chromatin domains. We identify a subset of boundaries with markedly higher CpG island density compared to the rest of the genome. daSTRs specifically localize to ultra-high-density CpG island boundaries, suggesting they might be hotspots for epigenetic misregulation or topological disruption upon STR expansion. Fragile X Syndrome patients exhibit severe boundary disruption in a manner that correlates with local loss of CTCF occupancy and the degree of FMR1 silencing. Our data uncover higher-order chromatin architecture as a new dimension in understanding repeat expansion disorders.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Nearly all disease-associated short tandem repeats (daSTRs) localize to 3D chromatin domain boundaries, especially boundaries with ultra-high CpG island density and high CTCF occupancy. In Fragile X syndrome, the FMR1 boundary is disrupted in patients, correlating with local CTCF loss and FMR1 silencing.
Key findings
- 22 of 27 daSTR loci localized to human ES cell boundaries, including 11 at TAD boundaries and 11 at subTAD boundaries; 21 of 23 neurological daSTRs localized to boundaries in human fetal cortical plate tissue.
- daSTRs were significantly closer to domain boundaries than matched normal-length repeats (0 bp versus 5,203 bp median; P = 0.00074 Mann-Whitney U; P = 0.0037 Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and enriched at boundaries (odds ratio = 4.77, Fisher’s exact P = 0.00056).
- daSTRs localized to CpG island-rich boundaries more than matched repeats (odds ratio = 10.4, P = 1.4E-8), with 65.7% of daSTRs at CpG island-rich boundaries versus 22.0% of matched repeats; no significant difference was found at CpG island-depleted boundaries or non-boundary CpG islands.
- In Fragile X syndrome patient samples, the FMR1 TAD boundary was ablated, a CTCF doublet ~100 kb upstream was lost, and boundary disruption correlated with FMR1 silencing; these topological changes occurred in at least three cell types and four patients.
Methods
- Analyzed published Hi-C data from human ES cells and human fetal cortical plate tissue, using DI+HMM for Mb-scale TADs and 3DNetMod for nested subTADs; daSTRs were mapped in hg19 and compared with normal-length repeats matched by repeat sequence, length range, and gene body placement.
- Performed 5C, CTCF ChIP-seq, qRT-PCR for FMR1 expression, and Sanger sequencing in Fragile X syndrome patient and control B-lymphocytes, fibroblasts, and postmortem brain tissue.
- Used Fisher’s exact, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel, randomization, and bootstrapped tests to assess boundary localization and CpG island density.
Limitations
- The paper states it does not aim to identify specific genetic variants predicting which individuals develop repeat expansion disorders, and that cause-and-effect relationships among boundary disruption, DNA methylation, CTCF occupancy, CpG islands, STR expansion, and gene expression remain unresolved.
- The paper notes that statistical power was restricted by small daSTR class sizes, and that rigorous thresholds likely missed some visually evident boundaries, making boundary enrichment estimates conservative.
- Evident from the text: the Fragile X syndrome topological analyses rely on a small number of patient samples and cell types, and the link between boundary disruption and FMR1 silencing is correlative rather than causal.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 56 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
daSTRs localize with boundaries exhibiting ultra-high CpG island density.
“Importantly, daSTRs localize with boundaries exhibiting ultra-high CpG island density (blue spheres, Figure 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The small subTAD encompassing the FMR1 gene dissolves in the ~935 FXS patient compared to the healthy sibling.
“Third, the small subTAD encompassing the FMR1 gene dissolves in the ~935 FXS patient compared to the healthy sibling (Figure 5B-C, lower green arrow).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Severe topological disruption around the FMR1 daSTR was observed in both FXS patient B cell lines compared to the healthy sibling with normal-length repeats.
“We observed severe topological disruption around the FMR1 daSTR in both FXS patient B cell lines compared to the healthy sibling with normal-length repeats (Figure 5B-D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
8 out of the 23 neurological daSTR loci were detected at TAD boundaries in human fetal cortical plate tissue.
“Consistent with our observations in human ES cells, we found 8 out of the 23 neurological daSTR loci were detected at TAD boundaries in human fetal cortical plate tissue (Figure 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All four classes of daSTRs showed enrichment at boundaries compared to other normal-length repeats matched by sequence and gene body location.
“Although statistical power was restricted by the small size of the groups, all four classes of daSTRs showed enrichment at boundaries compared to other normal-length repeats matched by sequence and gene body location (Figure S5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Boundaries containing matched normal-length repeat tracts show a striking increase in CpG island density compared to boundaries without repeats (Odds Ratio = 3.92, Fisher's Exact Test, P = 1.69E-110).
“Boundaries containing matched normal-length repeat tracts show a striking increase in CpG island density compared to boundaries without repeats (Odds Ratio = 3.92, Fisher’s Exact Test, P = 1.69E-110, Figure 4A-B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The extent of boundary disruption correlates with the degree of FMR1 silencing and local loss of CTCF occupancy at specific sites.
“The extent of boundary disruption correlates with the degree of FMR1 silencing and local loss of CTCF occupancy at specific sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A domain boundary separating FMR1 from the immediate upstream TAD in the healthy sibling was ablated in the ~935 FXS patient.
“First, a domain boundary separating FMR1 from the immediate upstream TAD in the healthy sibling was ablated in the ~935 FXS patient (Figure 5B-C, green bracket).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mean percentage of drawn repeats tracts that are boundary-associated increased from 49.5% in matched repeats to 81.1% in daSTRs.
“The mean percentage of drawn repeats tracts that are boundary-associated increased from 49.5% (bootstrapped 95% CI: 30.3% < μpercent_boundary < 68.6%) in matched repeats compared to 81.1% (bootstrapped 95% CI: 66.2% < μpercent_boundary < 96.0%) in daSTRs, respectively (Figure 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is no significant difference between matched repeats and daSTRs when the test is performed on CpG island-depleted boundaries (Fisher's Exact Test: Odds Ratio = 0.271 and P = 0.063; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test: Odds Ratio = 0.364).
“Importantly, there is no significant difference between matched repeats and daSTRs when the test is performed on CpG island-depleted boundaries (Fisher's Exact Test: Odds Ratio = 0.271 and P = 0.063; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test: Odds Ratio = 0.364; Figure 4E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is no significant difference between matched repeats and daSTRs at CpG islands not at boundaries (Fisher's Exact Test: Odds Ratio = 0.531 and P = 0.57; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test: Odds Ratio = 0.407).
“or CpG islands not at boundaries (Fisher's Exact Test: Odds Ratio = 0.531 and P = 0.57; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test: Odds Ratio = 0.407; Figure 4F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fragile X Syndrome patients exhibit severe boundary disruption.
“We found severe boundary disruption in patients with Fragile X Syndrome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
4 of the 5 daSTR loci that did not exhibit adjacency to quantitatively called domain boundaries were still co-localized at visually evident domain borders.
“Notably, 4 of the 5 daSTR loci that did not exhibit adjacency to quantitatively called domain boundaries were still co-localized at visually evident domain borders (Figure S1C-D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A randomization test demonstrated that daSTRs are significantly closer to domain boundaries compared to the genome-wide null distribution of matched repeats (empirical P=0.0001).
“Finally, we conducted a randomization test and demonstrated that daSTRs are significantly closer to domain boundaries compared to the genome-wide null distribution of matched repeats (empirical P=0.0001, Figure 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nearly all disease-associated STRs are spatially placed at boundaries between chromatin domains.
“Here, we discover that nearly all disease-associated STRs (daSTRs) are located at boundaries demarcating 3D chromatin domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The specific loop connecting the TAD immediately upstream of FMR1 was absent in the ~935 FXS patient.
“Second, the specific loop connecting the TAD immediately upstream of FMR1 was absent in the ~935 FXS patient (Figure 5B-C, upper green arrow).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
daSTRs are significantly closer to domain boundaries compared to matched repeat tracts (0 bp versus 5,203 bp median; P = 0.00074 Mann Whitney U Test; P = 0.0037, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test).
“We found that daSTRs are significantly closer to domain boundaries compared to matched repeat tracts (0 bp versus 5,203 bp median; P = 0.00074 Mann Whitney U Test; P = 0.0037, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
daSTRs are significantly more enriched at CpG-rich domain boundaries compared to normal-length matched STRs (Fisher's Exact Test: Odds Ratio = 10.4 and P = 1.4E-8; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test: Odds Ratio = 6.64).
“We found that daSTRs are significantly more enriched at CpG-rich domain boundaries compared to normal-length matched STRs (Fisher's Exact Test: Odds Ratio = 10.4 and P = 1.4E-8; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Test: Odds Ratio = 6.64; Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two classes of boundaries emerge: boundaries with high CpG island density and boundaries depleted of CpG islands.
“Two classes of boundaries emerge: boundaries with high CpG island density and boundaries depleted of CpG islands (Figure S6C-D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The effect was largely unchanged (Odds Ratio = 4.23) when performing the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.
“We confirmed that the effect was largely unchanged (Odds Ratio was =4.23) when performing the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Boundaries with daSTRs exhibit a dramatic increase in CpG island density even over the rigorous null of boundaries containing matched, normal-length repeats (Odds Ratio = 24.2, Fisher's Exact Test, P = 1.19E-8).
“Moreover, boundaries with daSTRs exhibit a dramatic increase in CpG island density even over the rigorous null of boundaries containing matched, normal-length repeats (Odds Ratio = 24.2, Fisher’s Exact Test, P = 1.19E-8, Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of the neurological daSTRs (21 out of 23) are located at domain boundaries in human cortical tissue.
“These results indicate that the majority of the neurological daSTRs (21 out of 23) are located at domain boundaries in human cortical tissue (Figure 3C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Boundaries can be stratified into at least two groups: those with high CpG island density and high occupancy of CTCF, and those depleted of CpG island density.
“Boundaries can be stratified into at least two groups: (1) those with high CpG island density and high occupancy of the architectural protein CTCF and (2) those depleted of CpG island density.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
A large number of daSTRs known to undergo paternal instability co-localized to boundaries in mouse sperm and not in mouse oocytes.
“Notably, a large number of daSTRs known to undergo paternal instability (McMurray, 2010; Pearson et al., 2005) co-localized to boundaries in mouse sperm and not in mouse oocytes (Du et al., 2017), suggesting that daSTRs could be at boundaries when germ line expansion takes place (Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
The majority of daSTRs at the human ES cell TAD boundaries reported in Schmitt et al. were also observed at boundaries invariant across the other four ES cell-derived differentiated cell types.
“We observed that the majority of daSTRs at the human ES cell TAD boundaries reported in Schmitt et al. were also observed at boundaries invariant across the other four ES cell-derived differentiated cell types (Figure S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mean percentage of repeat tracts located at CpG island-depleted boundaries or CpG islands not at boundaries was similar between matched repeats and daSTRs.
“The mean percentage of repeat tracts located at CpG island-depleted boundaries or CpG islands not at boundaries was similar between matched repeats and daSTRs, respectively (Figure 4H, I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All four classes of daSTRs co-localize with CpG island-rich boundaries, including STRs that did not specifically contain CpG dinucleotides in the repeat unit sequence.
“All four classes of daSTRs co-localize with CpG island-rich boundaries, including STRs that did not specifically contain CpG dinucleotides in the repeat unit sequence (Figure S5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An additional 11 out of 27 daSTRs were detected at subTAD boundaries in human ES cells.
“We detected an additional 11 out of 27 daSTRs at subTAD boundaries, including RUNX2 (cleidocranial dysplasia), ZIC2 (holoprosencephaly) and CACNA1A (spinocerebellar ataxia 6) (Figure 1B, Figure S1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
daSTRs showed significantly higher enrichment at domain boundaries compared to other normal-length, matched repeat sequences (Odds Ratio = 4.77, Fisher's Exact Test, P = 0.00056).
“Moreover, daSTRs showed significantly higher enrichment at domain boundaries compared to other normal-length, matched repeat sequences (Odds Ratio = 4.77, Fisher’s Exact Test, P = 0.00056, Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
There is enrichment for CTCF at human ES cell boundaries compared to loci internal to domains.
“Consistent with previous reports, we found enrichment for the architectural protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) at human ES cell boundaries compared to loci internal to domains (Figure S6A-B) (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012; Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
11 out of 27 daSTR loci exhibit striking co-localization with boundaries of TADs in human ES cells.
“Surprisingly, we observed that 11 out of 27 daSTR loci exhibit striking co-localization with boundaries of TADs, including FMR1 (Fragile X syndrome), HTT (Huntington’s disease), DMPK (Myotonic dystrophy 1), FXN (Friedreich’s ataxia), C9orf72 (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) and ATXN1 (spinocerebellar ataxia 1) (Figure 1A, Figure S1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No difference in boundary structure was observed between FXS patient and control B cells or brain tissue when examining domains distal to FMR1.
“Notably, we did not observe any difference in boundary structure between FXS patient and control B cells or brain tissue when examining domains distal to FMR1 (Figure 5H, Figure S7E-F), suggesting that loss of domain integrity in the FXS patient was specific to the genomic location of the daSTR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CTCF occupancy was largely unchanged across the genome in FXS patient and healthy sibling B cell samples.
“CTCF occupancy was largely unchanged across the genome in these samples (Figure 6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Complete boundary ablation was observed in fibroblasts from the same patient who contributed the B cells with ~645 repeats compared to fibroblasts from a race-, gender-, and age-matched individual.
“We also observed complete boundary ablation in fibroblasts obtained from the same patient who contributed the B cells with ~645 repeats (GM04025) compared to fibroblasts from a race-, gender-, and age-matched individual (GM04024) (Figure S7C-D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sanger sequencing confirmed that the loss of occupancy was not due to single nucleotide polymorphisms at the motifs.
“We used Sanger sequencing to confirm that the loss of occupancy was not due to single nucleotide polymorphisms at the motifs (Figure 6F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The same boundary disruption and large-scale reorganization of the topological environment surrounding the FMR1 daSTR was observed in human brain tissue from two FXS cases compared to two unaffected males.
“We observed the same boundary disruption and large-scale reorganization of the topological environment surrounding the FMR1 daSTR in human brain tissue, including enrichment of contacts between FMR1 and upstream TAD and depletion of contacts across the downstream TAD (Figure 5E-F, Figure S7A-B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a strong depletion and enrichment of contacts between the FMR1 gene and downstream and upstream TADs, respectively, in FXS.
“Finally, when plotting the difference between FXS and WT contact maps, it becomes evident that there is a strong depletion and enrichment of contacts between the FMR1 gene and downstream and upstream TADs, respectively (Figures 5B-C, blue and red stripes in fold change maps).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A doublet of occupied CTCF binding sites approximately 100 kb upstream of the FMR1 daSTR in healthy B-lymphocytes was lost in both FXS patient samples.
“Noteworthy, a doublet of occupied CTCF binding sites approximately 100 kb upstream of the FMR1 daSTR in healthy B-lymphocytes was lost in both FXS patient samples (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The TAD boundary around the FMR1 daSTR is disrupted in FXS in four unrelated patients, across two cell types and in brain tissue.
“We show that in four unrelated patients, across two cell types and in brain tissue, that the TAD boundary around the FMR1 daSTR is disrupted in FXS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All four topological phenotypes occurred in the second FXS patient with ~645 repeats.
“All four topological phenotypes occurred in the second FXS patient with ~645 repeats (Figure 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mb-scale TADs co-localized with daSTRs are constitutive across the somatic cell types analyzed in this study.
“Here we find that Mb-scale TADs co-localized with daSTRs are constitutive across the somatic cell types analyzed in this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Many of the daSTR-associated domain boundaries appear to be constitutive across healthy individuals.
“Indeed, many of the daSTR-associated domain boundaries appear to be constitutive across healthy individuals, thus it remains an open question why only a small proportion of human individuals might undergo daSTR expansion at CpG island-rich boundary locations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
From CTCF ChIP-seq data, three key peaks were identified where CTCF occupancy was differential around FMR1 between samples from healthy controls and those from patients diagnosed with Fragile X Syndrome.
“From the CTCF ChIP-seq data, we identified three key peaks where CTCF occupancy was differential around FMR1 between samples from healthy controls and those from patients diagnosed with Fragile X Syndrome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Boundary disruption has been linked to cancer and diseases of limb development.
“Boundary disruption has recently been linked to cancer and diseases of limb development (Flavahan et al., 2016; Hnisz et al., 2016; Lupianez et al., 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Multiple diverse classes of daSTRs are significantly enriched at domain boundaries compared to their matched, normal-length repeat tracts genome-wide.
“Together, these results indicate that multiple diverse classes of daSTRs are significantly enriched at domain boundaries compared to their matched, normal-length repeat tracts genome-wide.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The observation of 22 out of 27 daSTR loci at human ES cell boundaries is a conservative estimate.
“Thus, our observation of 22 out of 27 daSTR loci at human ES cell boundaries is a conservative estimate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The strong enrichment at boundaries regardless of tissue origin suggests that daSTR co-localization with boundaries might be robust across cell types relevant for the pathology.
“Thus, although the target cell type(s) for many unstable repeat expansion disorders are unknown, the strong enrichment at boundaries regardless of tissue origin suggests that daSTR co-localization with boundaries might be robust across cell types relevant for the pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Domain boundaries called in human ES cells and fetal cortical plate are relevant to the cell types of pathology for all daSTRs.
- Interpretationown data
The majority of daSTRs currently reported as susceptible to unstable expansion in human disease are spatially co-localized to boundaries of 3D genome domains in human ES cells.
“Together, our analyses indicate that the majority of daSTRs currently reported as susceptible to unstable expansion in human disease are spatially co-localized to boundaries of 3D genome domains in human ES cells (Figure 1C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Mapping daSTRs to normal-length repeat tracts in the hg19 reference genome is representative of disease-associated STR loci.
- Interpretationown data
The combination of ultra-high CpG island density and TAD boundary localization earmarks genomic locations susceptible to STR instability.
“Our results are consistent with a working model in which the combination of ultra-high CpG island density and TAD boundary localization earmarks genomic locations susceptible to STR instability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The unique genetic, epigenetic, and topological state at a critical subset of 3D chromatin domain boundaries might earmark locations in the genome with increased susceptibility to STR instability in human disease.
“Together, these data support a working model in which the unique genetic, epigenetic, and topological state at a critical subset of 3D chromatin domain boundaries might earmark locations in the genome with increased susceptibility to STR instability in human disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A subclass of TAD/subTAD boundaries represent hotspots in the genome of ultra-high density of CTCF occupancy and CpG islands.
“These results demonstrate that a subclass of TAD/subTAD boundaries represent hotspots in the genome of ultra-high density of CTCF occupancy and CpG islands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Unique genetic and epigenetic features (high CpG island density, high CTCF occupancy) exist at chromatin boundaries where daSTRs become unstable in repeat expansion disorders.
“These data uncover unique genetic and epigenetic features (high CpG island density, high CTCF occupancy) at chromatin boundaries where daSTRs become unstable in repeat expansion disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Loci susceptible to pathologic, unstable repeat expansion are significantly closer to domain boundaries than expected genome-wide by matched, normal-length repeat sequences.
“Together, our data indicate that loci susceptible to pathologic, unstable repeat expansion are significantly closer to domain boundaries than expected genome-wide by matched, normal-length repeat sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The topological reconfiguration of the genome could be related to pathologic silencing of the FMR1 gene.
“suggesting that the topological reconfiguration of the genome could be related to pathologic silencing of the FMR1 gene.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Additional architectural proteins are affected by repeat expansion.
“suggesting that additional architectural proteins are affected by repeat expansion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy.
“Our observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy (Brock et al., 1999; Cleary et al., 2010; Filippova et al., 2001; Libby et al., 2008; Sopher et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Loss of domain integrity in the FXS patient was specific to the genomic location of the daSTR.
“suggesting that loss of domain integrity in the FXS patient was specific to the genomic location of the daSTR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These results reveal a new link between mutation-length daSTRs and the reconfiguration of 3D genome folding in repeat expansion disorders.
“Together, these results reveal a new link between mutation-length daSTRs and the reconfiguration of 3D genome folding in repeat expansion disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Disruption of a CTCF binding site at the Atxn7 locus leads to increased somatic and germline repeat instability in a transgenic mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia 7.
“Disruption of a CTCF binding site at the Atxn7 locus leads to increased somatic and germline repeat instability in a transgenic mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia 7 (Libby et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Libby et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Boundary disruption correlates with the pathological transcription silencing of FMR1 in FXS.
“These results suggest that boundary disruption correlates with the pathological transcription silencing of FMR1 in FXS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
FMR1 TAD boundary disruption is correlated with disruption of CTCF occupancy.
“We additionally show that FMR1 TAD boundary disruption is correlated with disruption of CTCF occupancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Occupancy of a doublet CTCF motif over 100 kb from the FMR1 daSTR is lost in FXS patient samples at the genomic location of boundary disruption.
“These results demonstrate that occupancy of a doublet CTCF motif over 100 kb from the FMR1 daSTR is lost in FXS patient samples at the genomic location of boundary disruption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Studies in model organisms show that mutations in genes encoding key machinery involved in DNA replication, repair, and recombination are linked to STR instability.
“Studies in model organisms show that mutations in genes encoding key machinery involved in DNA replication, repair, and recombination are linked to STR instability (Iyer et al., 2015; McMurray, 2010; Mirkin, 2007; Pearson et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
daSTRs localized between constitutive TADs are likely to be placed at boundaries in the specific cell type(s) of origin relevant to each repeat expansion disorder.
“Thus, daSTRs localized between constitutive TADs are likely to be placed at boundaries in the specific cell type(s) of origin relevant to each repeat expansion disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Domain boundaries called in human ES cells and fetal cortical plate are relevant to the cell types of pathology for all daSTRs.
- Interpretationown data
Inherited human disorders driven by unstable repeat expansion might also be linked to patterns of higher-order genome folding.
“Here, we provide evidence suggesting that inherited human disorders driven by unstable repeat expansion might also be linked to patterns of higher-order genome folding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Although daSTRs exhibit diverse features, they share a common spatial placement at chromatin domain boundaries with ultra-high density CpG islands.
“We demonstrate that although daSTRs exhibit diverse features, they share a common spatial placement at chromatin domain boundaries with ultra-high density CpG islands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 26
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAn additional 8 and 5 daSTRs localized to subTAD and qualitatively apparent boundaries, respectively, in human cortical tissue.
“An additional 8 and 5 daSTRs localized to subTAD and qualitatively apparent boundaries, respectively (Figure 3B, Figure S4A-C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNearly all daSTRs are specifically targeted to CpG island-rich boundaries, but not boundaries devoid of CpG islands or CpG islands internal to domains.
“We observed that nearly all daSTRs are specifically targeted to CpG island-rich boundaries, but not boundaries devoid of CpG islands or CpG islands internal to domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is a marked increase in the density of CpG islands at boundaries vs. non-boundaries, whereas classic repressive chromatin marks such as H3K9me3 were slightly depleted at boundaries compared to loci internal to domains.
“Noteworthy, we also observed a marked increase in the density of CpG islands at boundaries vs. non-boundaries, whereas classic repressive chromatin marks such as H3K9me3 were slightly depleted at boundaries compared to loci internal to domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSevere reduction of FMR1 expression was found in all FXS patient samples with boundary disruption, whereas boundaries remained intact if FMR1 was not silenced.
“We found severe reduction of FMR1 expression in all FXS patient samples with boundary disruption, whereas boundaries remained intact if FMR1 was not silenced (Figure 6G-H, Figure S7I-K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CTCF doublet is located directly at the base of the upstream loop and TAD boundary; disruption of these structural features in FXS patients correlated with lost CTCF occupancy.
“The CTCF doublet is located directly at the base of the upstream loop and TAD boundary; disruption of these structural features in FXS patients correlated with lost CTCF occupancy (Figure 6C-D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe specific long-range contacts between FMR1 and the downstream TAD were lost in FXS but not mediated by CTCF.
“We also noticed that the specific long-range contacts between FMR1 and the downstream TAD were lost in FXS but not mediated by CTCF (Figure 6E, Figure S7G), suggesting that additional architectural proteins are affected by repeat expansion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe doublet CTCF sites contained CTCF motifs in the reverse orientation and looped to distal CTCF occupied motifs oriented in the forward direction.
“Consistent with the established principles of CTCF motif convergency (Rao et al., 2014), the doublet CTCF sites contained CTCF motifs in the reverse orientation and looped to distal CTCF occupied motifs oriented in the forward direction (Figure 6C-D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rao et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere is increased density of H3K27ac+ putative enhancers in the downstream TAD and minimal H3K27ac+ signal in the TAD upstream of the FMR1 daSTR.
“We found increased density of H3K27ac+ putative enhancers in the downstream TAD and minimal H3K27ac+ signal in the TAD upstream of the FMR1 daSTR (Figure 6I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFMR1 is biased towards downstream contacts (positive DI) in healthy individuals and transitions to upstream contacts (negative DI) in diseased individuals.
“FMR1 is biased towards downstream contacts (positive DI) in healthy individuals and transitions to upstream contacts (negative DI) in diseased individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCSTB was dropped from all analyses comparing daSTRs to matched normal-length repeats because there are no other repeats in hg19 matching its sequence, length, and gene body location requirements.
“One final gene (CSTB) was queried for boundary localization but dropped from all analyses that compared daSTRs to matched, normal-length repeats because there are no other repeats matching its sequence, length, and gene body location requirements in hg19.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningTBP and NOP56 were dropped from analyses because they are located at the far edges of chromosomes beyond where Hi-C can query domains.
“Of these 29, two (TBP, NOP56) were dropped from our analyses because they were located at the far edges of chromosomes beyond where Hi-C can query domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMammalian genomes are organized into a hierarchy of Megabase-scale topologically associating domains (TADs) and smaller, nested subTADs.
“Mammalian genomes are organized into a hierarchy of Megabase (Mb)-scale topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012) and smaller, nested subTADs (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012; Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013; Rao et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA small number of specific normal-length STRs undergo somatic or germline expansion and transition to intermediate, pre-mutation, and mutation repeat unit tract lengths.
“By a process that is poorly understood, a small number of specific normal-length STRs undergo somatic or germline expansion and transition to intermediate, pre-mutation, and mutation (affected) repeat unit tract lengths (Mirkin, 2007; Pearson et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChromatin domains span >90% of the genome and are thought to create insulated neighborhoods demarcating the search space of specific long-range interactions between enhancers and their target genes.
“Such chromatin domains span >90% of the genome and are thought to create insulated neighborhoods demarcating the search space of specific long-range interactions between enhancers and their target genes (Dowen et al., 2014; Narendra et al., 2015; Symmons et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNormal-length STR tracts are generally stable across generations and among somatic tissues in the same individual.
“Normal-length STR tracts are generally stable across generations and among somatic tissues in the same individual (McMurray, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McMurray, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationdaSTRs consist predominantly of a trinucleotide unit, but expandable tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide repeat sequences have also been reported.
“daSTRs consist predominantly of a trinucleotide unit, but expandable tetra-, penta-, and hexa-nucleotide repeat sequences have also been reported (Iyer et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Iyer et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPre-mutation and mutation lengths vary widely among the repeat expansion disorders.
“Pre-mutation and mutation lengths vary widely among the repeat expansion disorders (Iyer et al., 2015; McMurray, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHealthy individuals have tens of thousands of relatively short STR tracts distributed throughout their genomes.
“Healthy individuals have tens of thousands of relatively short STR tracts distributed throughout their genomes (Gymrek and Erlich, 2013; Gymrek et al., 2016; Willems et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationdaSTRs exhibit a wide range of repeat unit sequences and can be localized across the gene body in introns, exons, promoters and 3'/5' untranslated regions (UTRs).
“daSTRs also exhibit a wide range of repeat unit sequences and can be localized across the gene body in introns, exons, promoters and 3’/5’ untranslated regions (UTRs) (La Spada and Taylor, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites La Spada and Taylor, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationdaSTRs exhibit tremendous diversity in sequence, gene body location, and tract length.
“Disease-associated STR tracts (hereafter referred to as daSTRs) exhibit tremendous diversity in sequence, gene body location, and tract length.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore than 25 inherited human disorders are caused by the unstable expansion of repetitive DNA sequences termed short tandem repeats (STRs).
“More than 25 inherited human disorders are caused by the unstable expansion of repetitive DNA sequences termed short tandem repeats (STRs).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCpG islands are generally hypomethylated in normal somatic cells and can acquire aberrant hypermethylation in disease.
“CpG islands are generally hypomethylated in normal somatic cells and can acquire aberrant hypermethylation in disease (Robertson, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Robertson, 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningdaSTRs are present at boundaries in embryonic and somatic cell lineages and also in at least one stage of spermatogenesis when daSTR instability is paternally inherited.
“Together, these results indicate that daSTRs are present at boundaries in embryonic and somatic cell lineages and also in at least one stage of spermatogenesis when daSTR instability is paternally inherited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe mutation-length CGG STR acquires DNA methylation, which is thought to cause FMR1 silencing.
“The mutation-length CGG STR acquires DNA methylation, which is thought to cause FMR1 silencing (Park et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Park et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCpG islands are aberrantly hypermethylated in a subset of cancers that exhibit microsatellite instability.
“Moreover, CpG islands are aberrantly hypermethylated in a subset of cancers that exhibit microsatellite instability (Sharma et al., 2010; You and Jones, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sharma et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites You and Jones, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoundary disruption results in a dramatic re-organization of genome topology around the FMR1 gene, such that it no longer contacts genomic loci in the downstream TAD marked by active enhancers and instead merges with the upstream TAD largely devoid of active enhancer marks.
“This boundary disruption results in a dramatic re-organization of genome topology around the FMR1 gene, such that it no longer contacts genomic loci in the downstream TAD marked by histone modifications characteristic of active enhancers. Rather, FMR1 merges with the upstream TAD largely devoid of active enhancer marks, suggesting that the topological reconfiguration of the genome could be related”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSevere topological disruption at the FMR1 daSTR occurs in at least three cell types and at least four patients with FXS.
“Together, these results reveal severe topological disruption at the FMR1 daSTR in at least three cell types and at least four patients with FXS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFXS is caused by the loss of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) encoded by FMR1.
“FXS is caused by the loss of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) encoded by FMR1 (Verkerk et al., 1991).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Verkerk et al., 1991 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFMR1 is associated with the downstream TAD in healthy B cells and shifts to the upstream TAD in two patients with FXS.
“These results demonstrate that FMR1 is associated with the downstream TAD in healthy B cells and shifts to the upstream TAD in two patients with FXS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn congenital myotonic dystrophy, the region flanking the DM1 gene is hypermethylated and this methylation disrupts binding of adjacent CTCF binding sites.
“In congenital myotonic dystrophy, the region flanking the DM1 gene is hypermethylated and this methylation disrupts binding of adjacent CTCF binding sites (Filippova et al., 2001; Steinbach et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe null distribution for randomization tests was created by taking 10,000 draws without replacement of n=26 matched repeats, with each draw proportionally matched to the daSTR group with respect to repeat unit sequence and gene body location.
“The null distribution was created by taking 10,000 draws without replacement of n=26 matched repeats, where each draw is proportionally matched to the daSTR group with respect to repeat unit sequence and gene body location, and computing the test statistic each time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA total of 29 genes associated with trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders were initially selected for analysis based on previous reports.
“A total of 29 genes associated with trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders were initially selected for analysis based on previous reports (Tables S1-S3) (Iyer et al., 2015; La Spada and Taylor, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Iyer et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites La Spada and Taylor, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe method of partitioning the genome into 120kb bins and removing boundary-overlapping, centromere, telomere, gene desert, and unqueryable bins ensures that non-boundary bins are not dominated by hard-to-query regions of the genome.
“This method ensures that both boundaries and non-boundary bins are the same size, and that non-boundary bins are not dominated by hard to query regions of the genome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoundaries at a specific daSTR in the FMR1 gene are disrupted in FXS in a manner that markedly alters the enhancer landscape accessible to the gene and correlates with the loss of CTCF occupancy and FMR1 silencing.
“We discover that boundaries at a specific daSTR in the FMR1 gene are disrupted in FXS in a manner that markedly alters the enhancer landscape accessible to the gene and correlates with the loss of CTCF occupancy and FMR1 silencing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenRaw 5C counts distributions were quantile normalized to address minor sequencing depth differences.
“Raw 5C counts distributions were quantile normalized to address minor sequencing depth differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataTo ensure that Fisher's Exact test results were not artifacts of using a null repeat set not weighted similarly to the daSTRs set with respect to STR type group, they randomly created n=1000 subsets of the null repeat set weighted similarly to the daSTRs and used the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test to calculate a pooled odds ratio.
“To ensure that our results from the Fisher’s Exact test (Figure 2B, Figure 4D-F) were not artifacts of using a null repeat set that was not weighted similarly to the daSTRs set with respect to STR type group (Table S3), we also randomly created n=1000 subsets of the null repeat set that were weighted similarly to the daSTRs.”
- Also stated in: § QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES · plain
“We then used the Python StatsModel package implementation of the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test on the 1000 subsets to calculate a pooled odds ratio of the empirical distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA recent genome-wide association study in Huntington's disease patients identified a link between genetic variation in DNA repair machinery and the age of onset of the disease.
“A recent genome-wide association study in Huntington’s disease patients identified a link between genetic variation in DNA repair machinery and the age of onset of the disease (Genetic Modifiers of Huntington's Disease, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Genetic Modifiers of Huntington's Disease, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSTR instability at CpG island-rich boundaries manifests in individuals already genetically pre-disposed to repeat expansion.
“We posit that STR instability at CpG island-rich boundaries manifests in individuals already genetically pre-disposed to repeat expansion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent high-resolution Chromosome-Conformation-Capture sequencing studies have revealed that TAD boundaries are perturbed in rare human limb malformation diseases and certain types of cancers, leading to enhancer miswiring and pathogenic disruption of gene expression.
“Recent high-resolution Chromosome-Conformation-Capture sequencing studies have revealed that TAD boundaries are perturbed in rare human limb malformation diseases (Lupianez et al., 2015) and certain types of cancers (Flavahan et al., 2016; Hnisz et al., 2016), leading to enhancer miswiring and pathogenic disruption of gene expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSTR instability is known to occur in the germline, but tissue-specific somatic variation in STR tract length has been reported.
“STR instability is known to occur in the germline, but tissue-specific somatic variation in STR tract length has been reported (Leeflang et al., 1995; Telenius et al., 1994; Wohrle et al., 1993; Wong et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany other daSTRs are co-localized to subTAD boundaries, which are known to be dynamically reconfigured across cell state transitions in development.
“By contrast, many other daSTRS are co-localized to subTAD boundaries, which are known to be dynamically reconfigured across cell state transitions in development (Norton et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Norton et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe method of partitioning the genome into 120kb bins and removing boundary-overlapping, centromere, telomere, gene desert, and unqueryable bins ensures that both boundaries and non-boundary bins are the same size.
“This method ensures that both boundaries and non-boundary bins are the same size, and that non-boundary bins are not dominated by hard to query regions of the genome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationdaSTRs with similar sequence and gene body locations behave similarly with respect to number of repeats required for disease and expansion mechanisms.
“These groups are motivated by prior literature showing that daSTRs with similar sequence and gene body locations behave similarly with respect to number of repeats required for disease and expansion mechanisms (Iyer et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Iyer et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe published Mb-scale TAD calls from Schmitt et al. (2016) were generated using an independent study and an independent TAD calling method.
“We used these published Mb-scale TAD calls in Figure S2 because Ren and colleagues used an independent study and an independent TAD calling method to compare TADs across H1 ES cell (Human H1) and H1 ESC-derived lineages—mesendoderm (MES), mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), neural progenitor cells (NPC), and trophoblast-like cells (TRO).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmitt et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationRestriction fragment biases were normalized by applying matrix balancing as previously reported.
“Finally, restriction fragment biases were normalized by applying matrix balancing as previously reported (Imakaev et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Imakaev et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningMapped ChIP-seq reads were filtered to remove optical and PCR duplicates and downsampled to equivalent read numbers across cellular states to facilitate comparison of ChIP-seq libraries across cell types.
“To facilitate the comparison of ChIPseq libraries across cell types, the mapped reads were filtered to remove optical and PCR duplicates and then downsampled to equivalent read numbers across cellular states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe 120kb boundary size was chosen to address the resolution limit of the Hi-C assays (40 kb) used in this study.
“The 120kb boundary size was chosen to address the resolution limit of the Hi-C assays, 40 kb, used in this study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataBootstrapped confidence intervals for percent of repeats at boundary and CpG island density were constructed by randomly selecting groups of 26 repeats from both the matched repeat set and the daSTRs 1,000 times with replacement.
“Bootstrapped confidence intervals for percent of repeats at boundary and CpG island density were constructed by randomly selecting groups of 26 repeats from both the matched repeat set and the daSTRs 1,000 times with replacement and computing the percent of the randomly chosen repeats at a boundary in each sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The role for TAD boundaries in neurological disorders has not yet been reported.
“but the role for TAD boundaries in neurological disorders has not yet been reported.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mapping daSTRs to normal-length repeat tracts in the hg19 reference genome is representative of disease-associated STR loci.
“Because the samples are not diseased, we mapped daSTRs to the normal-length repeat tracts found in the hg19 reference genome (Tables S1-S3).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Domain boundaries called in human ES cells and fetal cortical plate are relevant to the cell types of pathology for all daSTRs.
“Thus, although the target cell type(s) for many unstable repeat expansion disorders are unknown, the strong enrichment at boundaries regardless of tissue origin suggests that daSTR co-localization with boundaries might be robust across cell types relevant for the pathology.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disruption of 3D genome organization has been demonstrated in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington's disease, Fragile X syndrome, and Down syndrome.
“the disruption of 3D genome organization has been demonstrated in neurodevelopmental and neurological neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington’s disease, Fragile X syndrome, Down syndrome, etc.”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [43]
Genome misfolding has been reported in fragile X syndrome, the leading monogenic cause of ASD, as well as other human diseases.
“Genome misfolding has been reported in fragile X syndrome48, the leading monogenic cause of ASD, as well as other human diseases49”
From Three-dimensional genome restructuring across timescales of activity-induced neuronal gene expression (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Four daSTR classes account for only 25 of 26 tracts
MinorThe methods say that 26 daSTR tracts were subdivided into these four classes, but the listed class sizes sum to 25. One tract is unaccounted for.
Reported 26 · recomputed 25
“The classes are: (1) Repeat unit CAG in exons and 5’UTRs (9 daSTRs), (2) Repeat unit GCG/CGG in exons and 5’UTRs (8 daSTRs), (3) Unique repeat units in introns (5 daSTRs), and (4) CTG introns in 3’UTRs (3 daSTRs).”
Cites
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…for CTCF peak 2 F: TCTTGTCTGGCCT GTATGGTTR: CCATATTGCACAATGCAGCTCT This paper N/A Software and Algorithms Bowtie/Bowtie2 Langmead et al., 2009; Langmead and Salzberg, 2012 http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/ Python MACS Zhang et al., 2008 https://github.com/taoliu/MACS BEDTools Quinlan 2014…”
BackgroundUltrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849 · see citing works
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386 · see citing works
MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching
Bailey, T. L., Boden, M., Buske, F. A., Frith, M., Grant, C. E., Clementi, L., Ren, J., Li, W. W., & Noble, W. S. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp335 · Cited by 10,648 · see citing works
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consistent with the established principles of CTCF motif convergency (Rao et al., 2014), the doublet CTCF sites contained CTCF motifs in the reverse orientation and looped to distal CTCF occupied motifs oriented in the forward direction (Figures 6C and 6D).”
BackgroundBolstad, B. M., Irizarry, R. A., Åstrand, M., & Speed, T. P. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185 · Cited by 8,185 · see citing works
deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis
Ramírez, F., Ryan, D. P., Grüning, B., Bhardwaj, V., Kilpert, F., Richter, A. S., Heyne, S., Dündar, F., & Manke, T. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw257 · Cited by 8,096 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…matrix balancing Imakaev et al., 2012 https://github.com/hiclib/iced MEME Suite Bailey et al., 2009 http://meme-suite.org Quantile normalization Bolstad et al., 2003 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 12538238 deepTools Ramı́rez et al., 2016 https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools”
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Mammalian genomes are organized into a hierarchy of megabase (Mb)-scale topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012) and smaller, nested subTADs (Dixon et al.”
BackgroundResultHistone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state
Creyghton, M. P., Cheng, A. W., Welstead, G. G., Kooistra, T., Carey, B. W., Steine, E. J., Hanna, J., Lodato, M. A., Frampton, G. M., Sharp, P. A., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016071107 · Cited by 4,302 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, to better understand how the FXS topological changes might be connected to FMR1 trancriptional silencing, we mined published ChIP-seq data in GM12878 cells for H3K27ac, an established mark of active enhancers (Creyghton et al., 2010).”
MethodVerkerk, A. J. M. H., Pieretti, M., Sutcliffe, J. S., Fu, Y.-H., Kuhl, D. P. A., Pizzuti, A., Reiner, O., Richards, S., Victoria, M. F., Zhang, F., et al. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90397-h · Cited by 3,481 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Boundary Disruption in Fragile X Syndrome Patients Correlates with FMR1 Silencing FXS is caused by the loss of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) encoded by FMR1 (Verkerk et al., 1991).”
BackgroundSpatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Mammalian genomes are organized into a hierarchy of megabase (Mb)-scale topologically associating domains (TADs) (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012) and smaller, nested subTADs (Dixon et al.”
BackgroundResultDNA methylation and human disease
Robertson, K. D. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1655 · Cited by 2,864 · cited 2× · see citing works
“TAD Boundary at the FMR1 daSTR Is Ablated in Fragile X Syndrome CpG islands are generally hypomethylated in normal somatic cells and can acquire aberrant hypermethylation in disease (Robertson, 2005).”
BackgroundSharma, S., Kelly, T. K., & Jones, P. A. (2010) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgp220 · Cited by 2,637 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, CpG islands are aberrantly hypermethylated in a subset of cancers that exhibit microsatellite instability (Sharma et al., 2010; You and Jones, 2012).”
BackgroundBEDTools: The Swiss‐Army Tool for Genome Feature Analysis
Quinlan, A. R. (2014) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi1112s47 · Cited by 2,286 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…et al., 2009; Langmead and Salzberg, 2012 http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/ Python MACS Zhang et al., 2008 https://github.com/taoliu/MACS BEDTools Quinlan 2014 https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2 ICED matrix balancing Imakaev et al., 2012 https://github.com/hiclib/iced MEME Suite Bailey et al.,…”
BackgroundThe UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool
Karolchik, D. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh103 · Cited by 2,269 · see citing works
Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions
Lupiáñez, D. G., Kraft, K., Heinrich, V., Krawitz, P., Brancati, F., Klopocki, E., Horn, D., Kayserili, H., Opitz, J. M., Laxova, R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004 · Cited by 2,132 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Recent high-resolution chromosomeconformation-capture sequencing studies have revealed that TAD boundaries are perturbed in rare human limb malformation diseases (Lupiáñez et al., 2015) and certain types of cancers (Flavahan et al.”
BackgroundChromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation
Dixon, J. R., Jung, I., Selvaraj, S., Shen, Y., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. E., Lee, A. Y., Ye, Z., Kim, A., Rajagopal, N., Xie, W., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14222 · Cited by 1,646 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Therefore, we focused on only Mb-scale TADs reported in an independent study by Schmitt et al. (2016) (STAR Methods) in human ESCs (n = 2,502) and ESC-derived differentiated cells including: mesendoderm (n = 2,479), mesenchymal stem cells (n = 2,290), neural progenitor cells (n = 2,378), and trophoblast-like cells (n…”
MethodInfluentialIterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization
Imakaev, M., Fudenberg, G., McCord, R. P., Naumova, N., Goloborodko, A., Lajoie, B. R., Dekker, J., & Mirny, L. A. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2148 · Cited by 1,423 · see citing works
Trinucleotide Repeat Disorders
Orr, H. T., & Zoghbi, H. Y. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113042 · Cited by 1,365 · cited 1× · see citing works
“hyperactivity, low IQ, social deficits, respiratory defects, and seizures (Orr and Zoghbi, 2007).”
BackgroundInsulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas
Flavahan, W. A., Drier, Y., Liau, B. B., Gillespie, S. M., Venteicher, A. S., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Suvà, M. L., & Bernstein, B. E. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16490 · Cited by 1,288 · cited 3× · see citing works
“, 2015) and certain types of cancers (Flavahan et al., 2016; Hnisz et al., 2016), leading to enhancer miswiring and pathogenic disruption of gene expression.”
BackgroundArchitectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment
Phillips-Cremins, J. E., Sauria, M. E. G., Sanyal, A., Gerasimova, T. I., Lajoie, B. R., Bell, J. S. K., Ong, C.-T., Hookway, T. A., Guo, C., Sun, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053 · Cited by 1,187 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Paired-end reads were mapped to a pseudo-reference genome representing all possible 5C primer ligation junctions as previously described (Beagan et al., 2016, 2016; Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013) (Table S6B).”
Self-citationDostie, J., Richmond, T., Arnaout, R., Selzer, R. R., Lee, W. L., Honan, T., Rubio, E. D., Krumm, A., Lamb, J., Nusbaum, C., et al. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5571506 · Cited by 1,182 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We performed chromosome-conformation-capture-carbon-copy (5C) (Dostie and Dekker, 2007; Dostie et al., 2006) on B-lymphocytes from an FXS patient with 935 CGG repeats (GM09237 from the Coriell Cell Repository), his healthy male sibling (GM09236), and a genetically unrelated FXS male with 645 repeats (GM04025) (Figure…”
MethodCancer Genetics and Epigenetics: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
You, J. S., & Jones, P. A. (2012) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.008 · Cited by 1,163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, CpG islands are aberrantly hypermethylated in a subset of cancers that exhibit microsatellite instability (Sharma et al., 2010; You and Jones, 2012).”
BackgroundActivation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods
Hnisz, D., Weintraub, A. S., Day, D. S., Valton, A.-L., Bak, R. O., Li, C. H., Goldmann, J., Lajoie, B. R., Fan, Z. P., Sigova, A. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9024 · Cited by 1,042 · cited 6× · see citing works
“CTCF Occupancy at the FMR1 daSTR Is Ablated in Fragile X Syndrome CTCF occupancy is disrupted at boundaries that lose structural integrity in diseases of limb development and cancer (Flavahan et al., 2016; Hnisz et al., 2016; Lupiáñez et al., 2015).”
InfluentialRefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences
Pruitt, K. D., Brown, G., Hiatt, S. M., Thibaud‐Nissen, F., Astashyn, A., Ermolaeva, O. D., Farrell, C. M., Hart, J. A., Landrum, M., McGarvey, K. M., et al. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1114 · Cited by 936 · see citing works
Expandable DNA repeats and human disease
Mirkin, S. M. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05977 · Cited by 934 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Studies in model organisms show that mutations in genes encoding key machinery involved in DNA replication, repair, and recombination are linked to STR instability (Iyer et al., 2015; McMurray, 2010; Mirkin, 2007; Pearson et al., 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialRepeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations
Pearson, C. E., Edamura, K. N., & Cleary, J. D. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1689 · Cited by 924 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Studies in model organisms show that mutations in genes encoding key machinery involved in DNA replication, repair, and recombination are linked to STR instability (Iyer et al., 2015; McMurray, 2010; Mirkin, 2007; Pearson et al., 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialControl of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes
Dowen, J. M., Fan, Z. P., Hnisz, D., Ren, G., Abraham, B. J., Zhang, L. N., Weintraub, A. S., Schuijers, J., Lee, T. I., Zhao, K., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.030 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome
Schmitt, A. D., Hu, M., Jung, I., Xu, Z., Qiu, Y., Tan, C. L., Li, Y., Lin, S., Lin, Y., Barr, C. L., et al. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.061 · Cited by 866 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(2016) (STAR Methods) in human ESCs (n = 2,502) and ESC-derived differentiated cells including: mesendoderm (n = 2,479), mesenchymal stem cells (n = 2,290), neural progenitor cells (n = 2,378), and trophoblast-like cells (n = 2,435) (Schmitt et al., 2016).”
BackgroundENCODE Data in the UCSC Genome Browser: year 5 update
Rosenbloom, K., Sloan, C. A., Malladi, V., Dreszer, T. R., Learned, K., Kirkup, V. M., Wong, M., Maddren, M., Fang, R.-H., Heitner, S. G., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Res. · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1172 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells
Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G. C., Lee, L. K., Ngo, Q., Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Edsall, L. E., Kuan, S., Luu, Y., Klugman, S., et al. (2010) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.018 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Repeat instability : mechanisms of dynamic mutations
Pearson, C. E. (2005) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Identification of Genetic Factors that Modify Clinical Onset of Huntington’s Disease
Lee, J.-M., Wheeler, V. C., Chao, M. J., Vonsattel, J. P. G., Pinto, R. M., Lucente, D., Abu-Elneel, K., Ramos, E. M., Mysore, J. S., Gillis, T., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.003 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Chromosome conformation elucidates regulatory relationships in developing human brain
Won, H., de la Torre-Ubieta, L., Stein, J. L., Parikshak, N. N., Huang, J., Opland, C. K., Gandal, M. J., Sutton, G. J., Hormozdiari, F., Lu, D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19847 · Cited by 584 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2015) and human fetal cortical plate tissue (Won et al., 2016).”
BackgroundResultNarendra, V., Rocha, P. P., An, D., Raviram, R., Skok, J. A., Mazzoni, E. O., & Reinberg, D. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1262088 · Cited by 535 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such chromatin domains span >90% of the genome and are thought to create insulated neighborhoods demarcating the search space of specific long-range interactions between enhancers and their target genes (Dowen et al., 2014; Narendra et al., 2015; Symmons et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMechanisms of trinucleotide repeat instability during human development
McMurray, C. T. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2828 · Cited by 496 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Normal-length STR tracts are generally stable across generations and among somatic tissues in the same individual (McMurray, 2010).”
InfluentialAllelic reprogramming of 3D chromatin architecture during early mammalian development
Du, Z., Zheng, H., Huang, B., Ma, R., Wu, J.-Y., Zhang, X.-L., He, J., Xiang, Y.-L., Wang, Q.-J., Li, Y.-Y., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23263 · Cited by 485 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2005) co-localized to boundaries in mouse sperm and not in mouse oocytes (Du et al., 2017), suggesting that daSTRs could be at boundaries at the developmental stage when germline expansion takes place (Figure S3).”
BackgroundRepeat expansion disease: progress and puzzles in disease pathogenesis
Spada, A. R. L., & Taylor, J. P. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2748 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Functional and topological characteristics of mammalian regulatory domains
Symmons, O., Uslu, V. V., Tsujimura, T., Ruf, S., Nassari, S., Schwarzer, W., Ettwiller, L., & Spitz, F. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.163519.113 · Cited by 455 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such chromatin domains span >90% of the genome and are thought to create insulated neighborhoods demarcating the search space of specific long-range interactions between enhancers and their target genes (Dowen et al., 2014; Narendra et al., 2015; Symmons et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSomatic and gonadal mosaicism of the Huntington disease gene CAG repeat in brain and sperm
Telenius, H., Kremer, B., Goldberg, Y. P., Theilmann, J., Andrew, S. E., Zeisler, J., Adam, S., Greenberg, C., Ives, E. J., Clarke, L. A., et al. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0494-409 · Cited by 439 · cited 1× · see citing works
“STR instability is known to occur in the germline, but tissuespecific somatic variation in STR tract length has been reported (Leeflang et al., 1995; Telenius et al., 1994; Wöhrle et al., 1993; Wong et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1994).”
BackgroundAbundant contribution of short tandem repeats to gene expression variation in humans
Gymrek, M., Willems, T., Guilmatre, A., Zeng, H., Markus, B., Georgiev, S., Daly, M. J., Price, A. L., Pritchard, J. K., Sharp, A. J., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3461 · Cited by 410 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Healthy individuals have tens of thousands of relatively short STR tracts distributed throughout their genomes (Gymrek and Erlich, 2013; Gymrek et al., 2016; Willems et al., 2017).”
BackgroundCTCF-binding sites flank CTG/CAG repeats and form a methylation-sensitive insulator at the DM1 locus
Filippova, G. N., Thienes, C. P., Penn, B. H., Cho, D. H., Hu, Y. J., Moore, J. M., Klesert, T. R., Lobanenkov, V. V., & Tapscott, S. J. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng570 · Cited by 332 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Our observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy (Brock et al., 1999; Cleary et al., 2010; Filippova et al., 2001; Libby et al., 2008; Sopher et al., 2011).”
BackgroundGenome-wide profiling of heritable and de novo STR variations
Willems, T., Zielinski, D., Yuan, J., Gordon, A., Gymrek, M., & Erlich, Y. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4267 · Cited by 329 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Healthy individuals have tens of thousands of relatively short STR tracts distributed throughout their genomes (Gymrek and Erlich, 2013; Gymrek et al., 2016; Willems et al., 2017).”
BackgroundYY1 and CTCF orchestrate a 3D chromatin looping switch during early neural lineage commitment
Beagan, J. A., Duong, M. T., Titus, K. R., Zhou, L., Cao, Z., Ma, J., Lachanski, C. V., Gillis, D. R., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.215160.116 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Self-citationSomatic heterogeneity of the CTG repeat in myotonic dystrophy is age and size dependent.
Wong, L.-J., Ashizawa, T., Monckton, D. G., Caskey, C. T., & Richards, C. S. (1995) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 204 · see citing works
The Unstable Repeats—Three Evolving Faces of Neurological Disease
Nelson, D. L., Orr, H. T., & Warren, S. T. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.022 · Cited by 200 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Unstable expansion of repetitive DNA sequences termed short tandem repeats (STRs) serves as the mechanistic basis for more than 25 inherited human disorders, including fragile X syndrome, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Friedreich’s ataxia (La Spada and Taylor, 2010;McMurray, 2010; Mirkin, 200…”
BackgroundCharacterization of the full fragile X syndrome mutation in fetal gametes
Malter, H. E., Iber, J. C., Willemsen, R., Graaff, E. D., Tarleton, J. C., Leisti, J., Warren, S. T., & Oostra, B. A. (1997) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0297-165 · Cited by 197 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We reasoned that boundaries might be disrupted in unstable repeat expansion disorders given that: (1) daSTRs are hypermethylated in fragile X syndrome (FXS) and myotonic dystrophy (Burman et al., 1999; Malter et al., 1997; Wöhrle et al., 1998, 2001) and (2) DNA methylation disrupts occupancy of the key architectural p…”
BackgroundMapping networks of physical interactions between genomic elements using 5C technology
Dostie, J., & Dekker, J. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.116 · Cited by 184 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We performed chromosome-conformation-capture-carbon-copy (5C) (Dostie and Dekker, 2007; Dostie et al., 2006) on B-lymphocytes from an FXS patient with 935 CGG repeats (GM09237 from the Coriell Cell Repository), his healthy male sibling (GM09236), and a genetically unrelated FXS male with 645 repeats (GM04025) (Figure…”
MethodP.Leeflang, E., Zhang, L., Tavare, S., Hubert, R., Srinidhi, J., E.MacDonald, M., H.Myers, R., Young, M. D., S.Wexler, N., F.Gusella, J., et al. (1995) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/4.9.1519 · Cited by 182 · cited 1× · see citing works
“STR instability is known to occur in the germline, but tissuespecific somatic variation in STR tract length has been reported (Leeflang et al., 1995; Telenius et al., 1994; Wöhrle et al., 1993; Wong et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1994).”
BackgroundPark, C.-Y., Halevy, T., Lee, D. R., Sung, J. J., Lee, J. S., Yanuka, O., Benvenisty, N., & Kim, D.-W. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.084 · Cited by 178 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The mutation-length CGG STR acquires DNA methylation, which is thought to cause FMR1 silencing (Park et al., 2015).”
BackgroundWöhrle, D., Hennig, I., Vogel, W., & Steinbach, P. (1993) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0693-140 · Cited by 174 · cited 1× · see citing works
“STR instability is known to occur in the germline, but tissuespecific somatic variation in STR tract length has been reported (Leeflang et al., 1995; Telenius et al., 1994; Wöhrle et al., 1993; Wong et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1994).”
BackgroundCritical DNA Binding Interactions of the Insulator Protein CTCF
Renda, M., Baglivo, I., Burgess-Beusse, B. L., Esposito, S., Fattorusso, R., Felsenfeld, G., & Pedone, P. V. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m706213200 · Cited by 152 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 1998, 2001) and (2) DNA methylation disrupts occupancy of the key architectural protein CTCF (Renda et al., 2007).”
BackgroundDetecting hierarchical genome folding with network modularity
Norton, H. K., Emerson, D. J., Huang, H., Kim, J., Titus, K. R., Gu, S., Bassett, D. S., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4560 · Cited by 146 · cited 2× · see citing works
“By contrast, many other daSTRS are colocalized to subTAD boundaries, which are known to be dynamically reconfigured across cell-state transitions in development (Norton et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationLibby, R. T., Hagerman, K. A., Pineda, V. V., Lau, R., Cho, D. H., Baccam, S. L., Axford, M. M., Cleary, J. D., Moore, J. M., Sopher, B. L., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000257 · Cited by 138 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Our observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy (Brock et al., 1999; Cleary et al., 2010; Filippova et al., 2001; Libby et al., 2008; Sopher et al., 2011).”
BackgroundBeagan, J. A., Gilgenast, T. G., Kim, J., Plona, Z., Norton, H. K., Hu, G., Hsu, S. C., Shields, E. J., Lyu, X., Apostolou, E., et al. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.004 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationDNA triplet repeat expansion and mismatch repair
Iyer, R. R., Pluciennik, A., Napierala, M., & Wells, R. D. (2015) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034010 · Cited by 130 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Studies in model organisms show that mutations in genes encoding key machinery involved in DNA replication, repair, and recombination are linked to STR instability (Iyer et al., 2015; McMurray, 2010; Mirkin, 2007; Pearson et al., 2005).”
BackgroundSopher, B. L., Ladd, P. D., Pineda, V. V., Libby, R. T., Sunkin, S. M., Hurley, J. B., Thienes, C. P., Gaasterland, T., Filippova, G. N., & Spada, A. R. L. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.027 · Cited by 126 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy (Brock et al., 1999; Cleary et al., 2010; Filippova et al., 2001; Libby et al., 2008; Sopher et al., 2011).”
Wöhrle, D., Salat, U., Hameister, H., Vogel, W., & Steinbach, P. J. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/322739 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Brock, G. (1999) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/8.6.1061 · Cited by 122 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy (Brock et al., 1999; Cleary et al., 2010; Filippova et al., 2001; Libby et al., 2008; Sopher et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSteinbach, P., Gläser, D., Vogel, W., Wolf, M., & Schwemmle, S. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/301711 · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In congenital myotonic dystrophy, the region flanking the DM1 gene is hypermethylated and this methylation disrupts binding of adjacent CTCF binding sites (Filippova et al., 2001; Steinbach et al., 1998).”
BackgroundZhang, L., Leeflang, E. P., Yu, J., & Arnheim, N. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0894-531 · Cited by 110 · cited 1× · see citing works
“STR instability is known to occur in the germline, but tissuespecific somatic variation in STR tract length has been reported (Leeflang et al., 1995; Telenius et al., 1994; Wöhrle et al., 1993; Wong et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 1994).”
BackgroundWöhrle, D., Salat, U., Gläser, D., Mücke, J., Meisel-Stosiek, M., Schindler, D., Vogel, W., & Steinbach, P. J. (1998) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.35.2.103 · Cited by 100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…repeat expansion disorders given that: (1) daSTRs are hypermethylated in fragile X syndrome (FXS) and myotonic dystrophy (Burman et al., 1999; Malter et al., 1997; Wöhrle et al., 1998, 2001) and (2) DNA methylation disrupts occupancy of the key architectural protein CTCF (Renda et al., 2007).”
Slipping while sleeping? Trinucleotide repeat expansions in germ cells
Pearson, C. E. (2003) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2003.09.006 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Future studies focused on creating high-resolution genome folding maps at distinct stages in spermatogenesis and oogenesis (Pearson, 2003) will yield insight into the role for boundaries in the developmental timing of germline instability.”
BackgroundCleary, J. D., Tomé, S., López Castel, A., Panigrahi, G. B., Foiry, L., Hagerman, K. A., Sroka, H., Chitayat, D., Gourdon, G., & Pearson, C. E. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1876 · Cited by 69 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our observations add a 3D component to the locus-specific evidence that STR instability is linked to alterations of CTCF occupancy (Brock et al., 1999; Cleary et al., 2010; Filippova et al., 2001; Libby et al., 2008; Sopher et al., 2011).”
Hypomethylation of an Expanded FMR1 Allele Is Not Associated with a Global DNA Methylation Defect
Burman, R., Yates, P. A., Green, L. D., Jacky, P. B., Turker, M. S., & Popovich, B. W. (1999) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302628 · Cited by 20 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…be disrupted in unstable repeat expansion disorders given that: (1) daSTRs are hypermethylated in fragile X syndrome (FXS) and myotonic dystrophy (Burman et al., 1999; Malter et al., 1997; Wöhrle et al., 1998, 2001) and (2) DNA methylation disrupts occupancy of the key architectural protein…”
Profiling Short Tandem Repeats from Short Reads
Gymrek, M., & Erlich, Y. (2013) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-514-9_7 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Healthy individuals have tens of thousands of relatively short STR tracts distributed throughout their genomes (Gymrek and Erlich, 2013; Gymrek et al., 2016; Willems et al., 2017).”
BackgroundDetecting hierarchical 3-D genome domain reconfiguration with network modularity
Norton, H. K., Huang, H., Emerson, D. J., Kim, J., Gu, S., Bassett, D. S., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2016) · doi:10.1101/089011
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transcription factors and 3D genome conformation in cell-fate decisions
Stadhouders, R., Filion, G. J. P., & Graf, T. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1182-7 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
On the existence and functionality of topologically associating domains
Beagan, J. A., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0561-1 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Self-citationIncomplete Penetrance and Variable Expressivity: From Clinical Studies to Population Cohorts
Kingdom, R., & Wright, C. F. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.920390 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
“Non-coding variants within enhancer regions can be a cause of phenotypic diversity through alterations in gene expression, therefore affecting overall disease phenotype presentation (Sun et al., 2018).”
BackgroundOn the wrong DNA track: Molecular mechanisms of repeat-mediated genome instability
Khristich, A. N., & Mirkin, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.rev119.007678 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Mismatch Repair Pathway, Genome Stability and Cancer
Pećina-Šlaus, N., Kafka, A., Salamon, I., & Bukovac, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.00122 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
“Recently it has been demonstrated that disease associated microsatellites are located in nexuses between chromatin domains (Sun et al., 2018) suggesting affected gene replication and expression.”
BackgroundEnhancers in disease: molecular basis and emerging treatment strategies
Claringbould, A., & Zaugg, J. B. (2021) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2021.07.012 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Repetitive DNA sequence detection and its role in the human genome
Liao, X., Zhu, W., Zhou, J., Li, H., Xu, X., Zhang, B., & Gao, X. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05322-y · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“However, they contain various regulatory elements involved in post-transcriptional gene regulation, such as mRNA stability, localization, and translation ef fi ciency 138 .”
BackgroundBeagan, J. A., Pastuzyn, E. D., Fernandez, L. R., Guo, M. H., Feng, K., Titus, K. R., Chandrashekar, H., Shepherd, J. D., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0634-6 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
“5C reactions were carried out as previously described 29,48,56 .”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationCohesin-dependence of neuronal gene expression relates to chromatin loop length
Calderon, L., Weiss, F. D., Beagan, J. A., Oliveira, M. S., Georgieva, R., Wang, Y.-F., Carroll, T. S., Dharmalingam, G., Gong, W., Tossell, K., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76539 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“Rad21tev/tev mice have been described (Tachibana-Konwalski et al., 2010; 1041 Weiss et al., 2021).”
Self-citationDileep, V., Boix, C. A., Mathys, H., Marco, A., Welch, G. M., Meharena, H. S., Loon, A., Jeloka, R., Peng, Z., Bennett, D. A., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.038 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“41 Further, the disruption of 3D genome organization has been demonstrated in neurodevelopmental disorders such as Fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome, etc. 42,43 Chromatin accessibility has also been shown to be disrupted in the AD brain.”
BackgroundJakubosky, D. A., D’Antonio, M., Bonder, M. J., Smail, C., Donovan, M. K. R., Greenwald, W. W. Y., Matsui, H., Bonder, M. J., Cai, N., Carcamo‐Orive, I., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16482-4 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The Role of Noncoding Variants in Heritable Disease
French, J. D., & Edwards, S. L. (2020) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2020.07.004 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“They showed in four fragile X syndrome patients that boundary disruption correlated with loss of CTCF occupancy and FMR1 transcriptional silencing, providing a new link between tandem repeat instability and 3D folding [75] (Figure 3C).”
BackgroundVisualizing the genome in high resolution challenges our textbook understanding
Lakadamyali, M., & Cosma, M. P. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0758-3 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
TADs and their borders: free movement or building a wall?
Chang, L.-H., Ghosh, S., & Noordermeer, D. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.11.025 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Dekker, J., Alber, F., Aufmkolk, S., Beliveau, B. J., Bruneau, B. G., Belmont, A., Bintu, L., Boettiger, A., Calandrelli, R., Disteche, C., et al. (2023) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.06.018 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationComputational methods for analysing multiscale 3D genome organization
Zhang, Y., Boninsegna, L., Yang, M., Misteli, T., Alber, F., & Ma, J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00638-1 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“DNA alterations such as short tandem repeats 198 and structural variations 199 have been found to shape 3D genome organization.”
Modifiers of CAG/CTG Repeat Instability: Insights from Mammalian Models
Wheeler, V. C., & Dion, V. (2021) · Journal of Huntington s Disease · doi:10.3233/jhd-200426 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
DNA methylation study of Huntington’s disease and motor progression in patients and in animal models
Lu, A. T.-H., Narayan, P. J., Grant, M. J., Langfelder, P., Wang, N., Kwak, S., Wilkinson, H. A., Chen, R. Z., Chen, J., Bawden, C. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18255-5 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Invited Review: Epigenetics in neurodevelopment
Salinas, R. D., Connolly, D. R., & Song, H. (2020) · Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology · doi:10.1111/nan.12608 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Verbiest, M. A., Maksimov, M., Ye, J., Anisimova, M. O., Gymrek, M., & Sonay, T. B. (2022) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.14106 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“Additional studies have demonstrated that STRs may affect 3D chromatin structure (Sun et al., 2018) and are enriched in chromatin loops (Jakubosky et al., 2020), suggesting a role of non- coding STRs in epigenetic regulation.”
BackgroundChromatin compartment dynamics in a haploinsufficient model of cardiac laminopathy
Bertero, A., Fields, P., Smith, A. S. T., Leonard, A., Beussman, K. M., Sniadecki, N., Kim, D.-H., Tse, H., Pabon, L., Shendure, J., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1083/jcb.201902117 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Order and disorder: abnormal 3D chromatin organization in human disease
Anania, C., & Lupiáñez, D. G. (2019) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elz028 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“novel molecular mechanism behind the FMR1 gene silencing in Fragile X syndrome (FXS), a disease characterized by an unstable expansion of repetitive DNA sequences termed short tandem repeats (STRs) [94].”
BackgroundTransposable elements drive reorganisation of 3D chromatin during early embryogenesisPreprint
Kruse, K., Díaz, N., Enriquez-Gasca, R., Gaume, X., Torres-Padilla, M., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2019) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/523712 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“More recently, an association between the expansion of disease-associated tandem repeats and three-dimensional chromatin topology has been reported, highlighting the role of these elements for healthy cellular function (Sun et al. 2018).”
BackgroundGenomic Enhancers in Brain Health and Disease
Carullo, N. V. N., & Day, J. J. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10010043 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Okhovat, M., VanCampen, J., Nevonen, K. A., Harshman, L., Li, W., Layman, C. E., Ward, S., Herrera, J., Wells, J., Sheng, R. R., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43841-8 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“6).”
InfluentialThree-dimensional chromatin in disease: What holds us together and what drives us apart?
Ibrahim, D. M., & Mundlos, S. (2020) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.01.003 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Wulfridge, P., & Sarma, K. (2024) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-024-01437-4 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“In addition, the expansion of tandem repeats at 3D chromatin boundaries is linked to boundary disruption in repeat expansion diseases such as fragile X syndrome 128 .”
Interpreting the impact of noncoding structural variation in neurodevelopmental disorders
D’haene, E., & Vergult, S. (2020) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-020-00974-1 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Single-cell multiplex chromatin and RNA interactions in ageing human brain
Wen, X., Luo, Z., Zhao, W., Calandrelli, R., Nguyen, T. C., Wan, X., Richard, J. L. C., & Zhong, S. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07239-w · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“Consist-ently, sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showed a larger conformational difference between Xa and Xi in excitatory neurons compared with inhibitory neurons or astrocytes in female mice 49 (Supplementary Note 13).”
InfluentialStructure-forming repeats and their impact on genome stability
Brown, R. E., & Freudenreich, C. H. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.10.006 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“The authors tested cells from Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) patients and healthy siblings and found that at the FMR1 locus, FXS patients with expanded repeats (>600 CGG repeats) exhibited disrupted TAD boundaries and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) binding that correlated to FMR1 silencing, compared to healthy siblings that di…”
BackgroundCalandrelli, R., Wen, X., Richard, J. L. C., Luo, Z., Nguyen, T. C., Chen, C.-J., Qi, Z., Xue, S., Chen, W., Yan, Z., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42274-7 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Showpnil, I. A., Selich‐Anderson, J., Taslim, C., Boone, M. A., Crow, J. C., Theisen, E. R., & Lessnick, S. L. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac747 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Alterations to CTCF binding have been previously shown to disrupt TAD boundaries (62,63).”
BackgroundNishihara, H. (2019) · Genes & Genetic Systems · doi:10.1266/ggs.19-00029 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“Patients with fragile X syndrome with the mutation-length STR exhibit loss of CTCF occupancy, disruption of the TAD boundary, and a reduced expression of the associated gene FMR1 (Sun et al., 2018).”
BackgroundWeiner, D. J., Ling, E., Erdin, S., Tai, D. J. C., Yadav, R., Grove, J., Fu, J. M., Nadig, A., Carey, C. E., Baya, N. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01203-y · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Enhancer–promoter specificity in gene transcription: molecular mechanisms and disease associations
Friedman, M. J., Wagner, T., Lee, H., Rosenfeld, M. G., & Oh, S. (2024) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01233-y · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Nuclear pores in genome architecture and enhancer function
Pascual‐García, P., & Capelson, M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2019.04.001 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Translational genomics and beyond in bipolar disorder
Zhang, C., Xiao, X., Li, T., & Li, M. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0782-9 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
3D genome, on repeat: Higher-order folding principles of the heterochromatinized repetitive genome
Haws, S. A., Simándi, Z., Barnett, R. J., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.052 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of insulators and transcription in 3D chromatin organization of fliesPreprint
Chathoth, K. T., Mikheeva, L. A., Crevel, G., Wolfe, J. C., Hunter, I., Beckett-Doyle, S., Cotterill, S., Dai, H., Harrison, A., & Zabet, N. R. (2022) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.275809.121 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Several studies have shown that TAD reorganization leads to changes in transcription that correspond to developmental defects or diseases (Chandra et al. 2015; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016; Hnisz et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2018; Kraft et al. 2019).”
The motif composition of variable number tandem repeats impacts gene expressionPreprint
Lu, T.-Y. T., Smaruj, P. N., Fudenberg, G., Mancuso, N., & Chaisson, M. (2023) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.276768.122 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Native functions of short tandem repeats
Wright, S. E., & Todd, P. K. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.84043 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Sex Differences in the Epigenome: A Cause or Consequence of Sexual Differentiation of the Brain?
Gegenhuber, B., & Tollkühn, J. (2019) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes10060432 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Epigenetic regulatory layers in the 3D nucleus
Willemin, A., Szabó, D., & Pombo, A. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.12.032 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Epigenetic regulation in Huntington's disease
Hyeon, J. W., Kim, A. H., & Yano, H. (2021) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2021.105074 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Histone Variants and Histone Modifications in Neurogenesis
Zhang, M., Zhao, J., Lv, Y., Wang, W., Feng, C., Zou, W., Su, L., & Jiao, J. (2020) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2020.09.003 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Kwon, D. Y., Xu, B., Zhao, Y.-T., Beagan, J. A., Beagan, J. A., Cui, Y., Xu, B., Zaitseva, D., Phillips‐Cremins, J. E., Blendy, J. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27571-3 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citation3D spatial genome organization in the nervous system: From development and plasticity to disease
Fujita, Y., Pather, S. R., Ming, G., & Song, H. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.06.004 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Generative modeling of multi-mapping reads with mHi-C advances analysis of Hi-C studies
Zheng, Y., Ay, F., & Keleş, S. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.38070 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“More recently, ( Sun et al., 2018 ) and ( Cournac et al., 2016 ) argued for a fundamental role of repeat elements in the 3D folding of genomes, highlighting the role of higher order chromatin architecture in repeat expansion disorders.”
BackgroundTAD fusion score: discovery and ranking the contribution of deletions to genome structure
Huynh, L. N., & Hormozdiari, F. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1666-7 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“A recent study [35] also reported that short tandem repeats related to diseases also co-localized at TAD boundaries.”
BackgroundThe polyG diseases: a new disease entity
Liufu, T., Zheng, Y., Yu, J., Yuan, Y., Wang, Z., Deng, J., & Hong, D. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-022-01383-y · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Alcalá‐Vida, R., Séguin, J., Lotz, C., Molitor, A. M., Irastorza-Azcárate, I., Awada, A., Karasu, N., Bombardier, A., Cosquer, B., Gómez-Skármeta, J. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20605-2 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Reddy, K., Jenquin, J. R., McConnell, O. L., Cleary, J. D., Richardson, J. I., Pinto, B. S., Haerle, M. C., Delgado, E., Planco, L., Nakamori, M., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1901893116 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Xu, L.-N., Yin, L., Qi, Y., Tan, X., Gao, M., & Peng, J.-Y. (2021) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.022 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Wen, J., Trost, B., Engchuan, W., Halvorsen, M., Pallotto, L. M., Mitina, A., Ancalade, N., Farrell, M. S., Backstrom, I., Guo, K., et al. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01857-4 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Spatially coordinated heterochromatinization of long synaptic genes in fragile X syndrome
Malachowski, T., Chandradoss, K., Boya, R., Zhou, L., Cook, A. L., Su, C., Pham, K., Haws, S. A., Kim, J. H., Ryu, H.-S., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.019 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationThree-dimensional chromatin organization in cardiac development and disease
Bertero, A., & Rosa‐Garrido, M. (2020) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.11.008 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
DNA methylation in satellite repeats disorders
Francastel, C., & Magdinier, F. (2019) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20190028 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Gaillard, M.-C., Broucqsault, N., Morere, J., Laberthonnìère, C., Dion, C., Badja, C., Roche, S., Nguyen, K., Magdinier, F., & Robin, J. D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46861-x · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Neuron-specific chromosomal megadomain organization is adaptive to recent retrotransposon expansions
Chandrasekaran, S., Espeso‐Gil, S., Loh, Y. E., Javidfar, B., Kassim, B. S., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Dong, Y., Bicks, L. K., Li, H., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26862-z · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“(genotype [0 IAPs,1+ IAPs]: WT1 [31,4]; WT2 [32,3]; WT3 [47,4]; WT4 [51,0]; KO1 [20,15]; KO2 [21,14]; KO3 [28, 23]; KO4 [26,28]), Student’s two-sided t-test (p=3.69×10-5).”
InfluentialXu, J.-X., Xu, X., Huang, D., Luo, Y., Lin, L., Bai, X.-M., Zheng, Y., Yang, Q., Cheng, Y., Huang, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48593-7 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“3DNetMod identi fi es subTADs in ESCs to help discover the relationship between high-scale genome topology alteration and disease-associated short tandem repeats (STRs), which is well known to contribute to over 25 inherited disorders 71 .”
Grapotte, M., Saraswat, M., Bessière, C., Menichelli, C., Ramilowski, J. A., Severin, J., Hayashizaki, Y., Itoh, M., Tagami, M., Murata, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23143-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“This observation suggests that, similar to other repeat-initiating RNAs 55,56 , RNAs initiating at STRs could also play roles at the nuclear/chromatin levels, for instance in DNA topology 56,57 .”
BackgroundSAFB restricts contact domain boundaries associated with L1 chimeric transcription
Hong, Y., Bie, L., Zhang, T., Yan, X., Jin, G., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Li, X., Pei, G., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.03.021 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The role of GATA4 in mesenchymal stem cell senescence: A new frontier in regenerative medicine
Babu, M. A., Renuka Jyothi, S., Kaur, I., Kumar, S., Sharma, N., Kumar, M., Rajput, P., Ali, H., Gupta, G., Subramaniyan, V., et al. (2024) · Regenerative Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.reth.2024.11.017 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Currently, special strategies are being created in order to control it [65].”
RExPRT: a machine learning tool to predict pathogenicity of tandem repeat loci
Fazal, S., Danzi, M. C., Xu, I. R. L., Kobren, S. N., Sunyaev, S. R., Reuter, C. M., Marwaha, S., Wheeler, M. T., Dolzhenko, E., Lucas, F., et al. (2024) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-024-03171-4 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The dynamics of chromatin architecture in brain development and function
Harabula, I., & Pombo, A. (2021) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.12.008 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Campion, L. N., Maza, A. M., Yadav, R., Penney, E. B., Murcar, M. G., Correia, K., Gillis, T., Fernandez‐Cerado, C., Velasco-Andrada, M. S., Legarda, G. P., et al. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-022-01349-0 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
DNA-initiated Epigenetic Cascades Driven by C9orf72 Hexanucleotide Repeat
Liu, Y., Huang, Z.-Y., Liu, H., Ji, Z.-C., Arora, A., Cai, D., Wang, H., Liu, M., Simko, E. A. J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.01.022 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The 3D genome and its impacts on human health and disease
Wang, S., Luo, Z., Liu, W., Hu, T., Zhao, Z., Rosenfeld, M. G., & Song, X. (2023) · Life Medicine · doi:10.1093/lifemedi/lnad012 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“In fragile X syndrome, the STRs within the FMR1 gene are unstable and expand with DNA methylation so that CTCF cannot bind, resulting in silencing of the FMR1 gene [169].”
Epigenetics of Neuromuscular Disorders
Coppedè, F. (2020) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi-2020-0282 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Targeted Oligonucleotides for Treating Neurodegenerative Tandem Repeat Diseases
Zain, R., & Rjh, S. (2019) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-019-00712-9 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“recently reported to co-localize with short tandem repeats [118], and in plants, it was found that an intronic GAA•TTC”
BackgroundGhavi-Helm, Y. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.09.010 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Xiao, X., Zhang, C., Zhang, Z., Hu, Z., Li, M., & Li, T. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01329-1 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Kumari, D., Gazy, I., & Usdin, K. (2019) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci9020039 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The molecular pathogenesis of repeat expansion diseases
Fujino, Y., & Nagai, Y. (2021) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20200143 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Yin, B., Wang, H., Zhu, P., Weng, S., He, J., & Li, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.01257 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Three-dimensional chromatin interactions remain stable upon CAG/CTG repeat expansion
Buendía, G. A. R., Leleu, M., Marzetta, F., Vanzan, L., Tan, J. Y., Ythier, V., Randall, E. L., Marques, A. C., Baubec, T., Murr, R., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz4012 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization
Wall, B. P. G., Nguyen, M., Harrell, J. C., & Dozmorov, M. G. (2024) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-4136-1_22 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Epigenetics of Myotonic Dystrophies: A Minireview
Visconti, V. V., Centofanti, F., Fittipaldi, S., Macrì, E., Novelli, G., & Botta, A. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222212594 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Finally, recent studies revealed a link between 3D genome folding and several expansion disorders in which genes are placed at the boundaries between topologically associating domains (TADs) that are highly enriched on CpG islands, suggesting that repeat expansions could disrupt TADs structure, resulting in a reorgani…”
BackgroundpreciseTAD: a transfer learning framework for 3D domain boundary prediction at base-pair resolution
Stilianoudakis, S. C., Marshall, M. A., & Dozmorov, M. G. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab743 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Three‐dimensional genome structure and function
Liu, H., Tsai, H., Yang, M., Li, G., Bian, Q., Ding, G., Wu, D., & Dai, J. (2023) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.326 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Fernandez, L. R., Gilgenast, T. G., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02061-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Raw 5C counts were subjected to our previously published 5C count modeling methods [32, 60, 62 – 65].”
MethodSelf-citationCell-type-specific loops linked to RNA polymerase II elongation in human neural differentiation
Titus, K. R., Simándi, Z., Chandrashekar, H., Paquet, D., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2024) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100606 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“20,36,37,74,75,78,79 Briefly, media was discarded, cells were washed with 6 mL of 1x PBS and 10 mL of freshly prepared fixation media (1% (v/v) formaldehyde in DMEM/F-12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #11320033)) was added to the cells growing on 10 cm cell culture dishes and incubated for 10 min at room…”
Self-citationGenomic Data in the Electronic Health Record
Walton, N., Johnson, D. K., Person, T. N., & Chamala, S. (2019) · Advances in Molecular Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.yamp.2019.07.001 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Ooi, J., Utami, K. H., Langley, S. R., Aning, O. A., Park, D. S., Renner, M., Ma, S., Cheok, C. F., Knoblich, J. A., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/850586 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“A recent study has shown that repeat expansion disease genes, including HTT, localize to boundaries of chromatin domains associated with defined chromatin topology [57].”
A landscape of complex tandem repeats within individual human genomes
Ichikawa, K., Kawahara, R., Asano, T., & Morishita, S. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41262-1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“WespeculatethatcomplexTRsinintronsor in intergenic regions may in fl uence promoter-enhancer interactions during brain development 39 because CTCF loops, the basic chromatin structures of the nucleus 40 , have been reported to be established at gastrulation 41 .”
Dynamics of transcriptional enhancers and chromosome topology in gene regulation
Yokoshi, M., & Fukaya, T. (2019) · Development Growth & Differentiation · doi:10.1111/dgd.12597 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“More recently, many disease- associated tandem repeats were found to be located in topological boundaries (Sun et al., 2018).”
BackgroundRegulatory landscape in brain development and disease
Spiess, K., & Won, H. (2020) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2020.05.007 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“A recent study has also shown that the expansion of tandem repeats in fragile X syndrome leads to the disruption of TAD boundaries, suggesting a role of TADs in brain disease [40].”
BackgroundInduction of a chromatin boundary in vivo upon insertion of a TAD border
Willemin, A., Lopez‐Delisle, L., Bolt, C. C., Gadolini, M.-L., Duboule, D., & Rodríguez-Carballo, E. (2021) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009691 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“In the vast majority of cases, TAD boundaries host binding sites for CTCF and they are associated with other features including housekeeping genes and CpG islands [2,5,6].”
BackgroundIntegrating transposable elements in the 3D genome
Bousios, A., Nützmann, H., Buck, D., & Michieletto, D. (2020) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-020-0202-3 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Three-dimensional chromatin organization in brain function and dysfunction
Dileep, V., & Tsai, L.-H. (2021) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2021.04.006 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Genetic and Epigenetic Interplay Define Disease Onset and Severity in Repeat Diseases
Barbé, L., & Finkbeiner, S. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2022.750629 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Finally, a TAD boundary at the repeat region and CTCF binding site was recently shown to be disrupted in DM1, indicating that chromatin organization may be more broadly altered in the disease (Sun et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialWu, Z., Gong, H., Zhou, Z., Jiang, T., Lin, Z., Li, J., Xiao, S., Yang, B., & Huang, L. (2022) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-021-00658-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
C9orf72 repeat expansion creates the unstable folate-sensitive fragile site FRA9A
Mirceta, M., Schmidt, M. H. M., Shum, N., Prasolava, T., Meikle, B., Lanni, S., Mohiuddin, M., McKeever, P. M., Zhang, M., Liang, M., et al. (2024) · NAR Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1093/narmme/ugae019 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A subset of topologically associating domains fold into mesoscale core-periphery networks
Huang, H., Chen, S. T., Titus, K. R., Emerson, D. J., Bassett, D. S., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45457-9 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatial genome exploration in the context of cognitive and neurological disease
Rajarajan, P., Borrman, T. M., Liao, W., Espeso‐Gil, S., Chandrasekaran, S., Jiang, Y., Weng, Z., Brennand, K., & Akbarian, S. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.05.007 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Unsurprisingly, given that TAD landscapes are largely invariant to cell type, the disease-relevant STR location at TAD boundaries was present in embryonic stem cell, blood, neural progenitor and postmortem brain tissue[45].”
BackgroundInfluentialRelatively semi-conservative replication and a folded slippage model for short tandem repeats
Zhang, H., Li, D., Zhao, X., Pan, S., Wu, X., Peng, S., Huang, H., Shi, R., & Tan, Z. (2020) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-020-06949-5 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Common Threads: Aphidicolin-Inducible and Folate-Sensitive Fragile Sites in the Human Genome
Lokanga, R. A., Kumari, D., & Usdin, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.708860 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Sorek, M., Cohen, L. R. Z., & Meshorer, E. (2019) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqz003 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Interestingly, another recent work showed that most of the disease-associated short tandem repeats in the human genome are located at the boundaries between topologically associated domains (TADs) (36).”
Focused Strategies for Defining the Genetic Architecture of Congenital Heart Defects
Martin, L. J., & Benson, D. W. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12060827 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Visualising three-dimensional genome organisation in two dimensions
Ing‐Simmons, E., & Vaquerizas, J. M. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.177162 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…expression of developmental transcription factors and thus are associated with developmental defects and congenital disease, including limb malformation disorders and Fragile X syndrome (Franke et al., 2016; Ibn-Salem et al., 2014; Lupiáñez et al., 2015; Spielmann et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018).”
Background
- Authors
- Sun, J. H., Zhou, L., Emerson, D. J., Phyo, S. A., Titus, K. R., Gong, W., Gilgenast, T. G., Beagan, J. A., Davidson, B. L., Tassone, F., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 224-238.e15
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6175607
- OpenAlex
- W2889421335
- Semantic Scholar
- 68a0a360b6754c0c8f9f272f6ff06cd5b60de52a
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 12.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The New York Stem Cell Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- NIH Director’s New Innovator Award (1DP2MH11024701)
- 4D Nucleome Common Fund (1U01HL12999801)
- NIH (R01 GM113929)
- NSF-NIGMS (1562665)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- microsatellite markers, repeat expansion disorders, chromatin domain boundaries, CpG islands, fragile X syndrome, chromatin topology
- MeSH terms
- CCCTC-Binding Factor, Adult, Brain, Cell Line, Chromatin, Disease, DNA, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Genome, Human, Microsatellite Repeats, CpG Islands, Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review