Cited by 539HIV Research and TreatmentAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsT-cell and Retrovirus Studies

The stoichiometry of Gag protein in HIV-1

Briggs, John A G, Simon, Martha N, Gross, Ingolf, Kräusslich, Hans-Georg, Fuller, Stephen D, Vogt, Volker M, Johnson, Marc C·2004·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Abstract

The major structural components of HIV-1 are encoded as a single polyprotein, Gag, which is sufficient for virus particle assembly. Initially, Gag forms an approximately spherical shell underlying the membrane of the immature particle. After proteolytic maturation of Gag, the capsid (CA) domain of Gag reforms into a conical shell enclosing the RNA genome. This mature shell contains 1,000-1,500 CA proteins assembled into a hexameric lattice with a spacing of 10 nm. By contrast, little is known about the structure of the immature virus. We used cryo-EM and scanning transmission EM to determine that an average (145 nm diameter) complete immature HIV particle contains approximately 5,000 structural (Gag) proteins, more than twice the number from previous estimates. In the immature virus, Gag forms a hexameric lattice with a spacing of 8.0 nm. Thus, less than half of the CA proteins form the mature core.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nsmb785

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mature CA lattice has a hexamer-hexamer spacing larger than that seen in the immature virus particle.

    “The mature CA lattice has a hexamer-hexamer spacing larger than that seen in the immature virus particle”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briggs, J. A. G., Simon, M. N., Gross, I., Kräusslich, H.-G., Fuller, S. D., Vogt, V. M., & Johnson, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Marc C
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2004-06-20
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
672-675
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W1986015062
Cited by
539
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 44
FWCI
10.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR01777, P41RR001777)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
Keywords
HIV-1, Gag protein, capsid protein, viral assembly, stoichiometry, proteolytic maturation, cryo-electron microscopy, scanning transmission electron microscopy
MeSH terms
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, HIV-1, Gene Products, gag, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review