Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 792

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Getting Worse: The Stigmatization of Obese Children

Latner, Janet D., Stunkard, Albert J.·2003·Obesity Research

Abstract

Objective: The prevalence of childhood obesity more than doubled in the period from 1961 to 2001. We replicated a 1961 study of stigma in childhood obesity to see what effect this increased prevalence has had on this stigma. Research Methods and Procedures: Participants included 458 5th‐ and 6th‐grade children attending upper‐middle and lower‐middle income U.S. public schools. Children ranked six drawings of same‐sex children with obesity, various disabilities, or no disability (“healthy”), in order of how well they liked each child. Results: Children in both the present and the 1961 study liked the drawing of the obese child least. The obese child was liked significantly less in the present study than in 1961 [Kruskal‐Wallis H (1) = 130.53, p < 0.001]. Girls liked the obese child less than boys did [H (1) = 5.23, p < 0.02]. Children ranked the healthy child highest and significantly higher than in 1961 [H (1) = 245.40, p < 0.001]. The difference in liking between the healthy and obese child was currently 40.8% greater than in 1961. Discussion: Stigmatization of obesity by children appears to have increased over the last 40 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2003.61

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 792

Metadata

Authors
Latner, J. D., & Stunkard, A. J.
Venue
Obesity Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
452-456
ISSN
  • 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-8528
OpenAlex
W2161661503
Cited by
792
References
1
FWCI
83.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.