The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased Portion Size Leads to Increased Energy Intake in a Restaurant Meal
Abstract
Objective: Eating frequently in restaurants is one of the behaviors associated with obesity. This study examined whether increasing the portion size of an entrée affected energy intake at a restaurant meal. Research Methods and Procedures: In a cafeteria‐style restaurant on different days, the size of a pasta entrée was varied from a standard portion (248 g) to a large portion (377 g). The entrée price was not changed. Intake of the entrée was determined by covertly weighing each dish before and after the meal; intake of all other foods was determined by estimating the percent consumed. The 180 adult customers who purchased the entrée also completed a survey in which they rated characteristics of the meal, including the appropriateness of the entrée portion size and the amount that they ate compared with their usual meal. Results: Portion size had a significant effect on intake of the entrée (p < 0.0001). Compared with customers who purchased the standard portion, those who purchased the larger portion increased their energy intake of the entrée by 43% (719 kJ; 172 kcal) and of the entire meal by 25% (664 kJ; 159 kcal). There was no difference between the two groups of customers in ratings of the appropriateness of the portion size or of the amount that was eaten in relation to their usual meal. Discussion: In a restaurant setting, increasing the size of an entrée results in increased energy intake. These results support the suggestion that large restaurant portions may be contributing to the obesity epidemic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patterns and Trends in Food Portion Sizes, 1977-1998
Nielsen, S. J., & Popkin, B. M. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.4.450 · Cited by 1,045
Guthrie, J. F., Lin, B.-H., & Frazao, E. (2002) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60083-3 · Cited by 973
Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women
Rolls, B. J., Morris, E. L., & Roe, L. S. (2002) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1207 · Cited by 793
Self-citation
Cited by
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity in Brazilian adolescents and adults
Louzada, M. L. D. C., Baraldi, L. G., Steele, E. M., Martins, A. P. B., Canella, D. S., Moubarac, J.-C., Levy, R. B., Cannon, G., Afshin, A., Imamura, F., et al. (2015) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.018 · Cited by 656
Ello-Martin, J. A., Ledikwe, J. H., & Rolls, B. J. (2005) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/82.1.236s · Cited by 513
Self-citation(2004) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.030 · Cited by 398
The meaning of food in our lives: a cross-cultural perspective on eating and well-being
Rozin, P. (2005) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60209-1 · Cited by 390
Selected eating behaviours and excess body weight: a systematic review
Mesas, A. E., Muñoz‐Pareja, M., López‐García, E., & Rodríguez‐Artalejo, F. (2012) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00936.x · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Diliberti, N., Bordi, P. L., Conklin, M. T., Roe, L. S., & Rolls, B. J.
- Venue
- Obesity Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 562-568
- ISSN
- 1071-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-8528
- OpenAlex
- W2086816369
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Portion Size Leads to Increased Energy Intake in a Restaurant Meal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/oby.2004.64
- The paper
- Diliberti, N., Bordi, P. L., Conklin, M. T., Roe, L. S., & Rolls, B. J. (2004). Increased Portion Size Leads to Increased Energy Intake in a Restaurant Meal. Obesity Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2004.64
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.