Cited by 219Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

Selected eating behaviours and excess body weight: a systematic review

Mesas, A. E., Muñoz‐Pareja, M., López‐García, E., Rodríguez‐Artalejo, F.·2012·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: The relationship between obesity and the intake of macronutrients and specific foods is uncertain. Thus, there is growing interest in some eating behaviours because they may reflect the joint effect of several foods and nutrients and, thus, increase the likelihood of finding a link to obesity. This study examined the association between selected eating behaviours and excess weight in the general population throughout a systematic review of publications written in English, Spanish or Portuguese identified in a PubMed search up to 31 December 2010. We included 153 articles, 73 of which have been published since 2008. Only 30 studies had a prospective design; of these, 15 adjusted for sociodemographic variables, physical activity and energy or food intake. Moreover, definitions of eating behaviours varied substantially across studies. We found only small or inconsistent evidence of a relationship between excess weight and skipping breakfast, daily eating frequency, snacking, irregular meals, eating away from home, consumption of fast food, takeaway food intake, consumption of large food portions, eating until full and eating quickly. In conclusion, this review highlights the difficulty in measuring human behaviour, and suggests that a more systematic approach is needed for capturing the effects of eating behaviours on body weight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00936.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mesas, A. E., Muñoz‐Pareja, M., López‐García, E., & Rodríguez‐Artalejo, F.
Affiliations
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES)
Corresponding author
Mesas, A. E.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-28
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
106-135
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W1518729828
Cited by
219
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Plan Nacional sobre Drogas
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
eating behaviour, overweight, obesity, breakfast skipping, meal frequency, snacking, eating out, fast food consumption, takeaway food, portion size, eating speed, macronutrient intake, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Obesity, Public Health, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review