The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Weight Perception
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this research was to estimate the prevalence of weight misperception among adults using the most recent nationally representative data, according to measured weight category and to assess the relationship between weight misperception and race/ethnicity. Height and weight were measured as part of the 1999–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study sample consisted of 17,270 adults aged ≥20 years. BMI was categorized as underweight (BMI < 18.5), healthy weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30), and obese (BMI ≥ 30). Subjects reported self‐perception of weight status. Among study subjects, 31.7% of healthy weight adults, 38.1% of overweight adults, and 8.1% of obese adults incorrectly perceived their weight category. Among obese men, the odds of weight misperception were higher for non‐Hispanic blacks (odds ratio (OR) = 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.0–4.5) compared to non‐Hispanic whites and for persons with less than a high school education (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.3–2.1), compared to those with some college education. Among obese women, the odds of weight misperception were higher for non‐Hispanic blacks (OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.4, 3.1) and Mexican Americans (OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.2, 3.2) compared to non‐Hispanic whites and for persons with less than high school education compared to those with some college education (OR = 5.5; 95% CI = 3.3–9.3). Weight misperception is highly prevalent in the US population, and more frequent in racial/ethnic minorities, males, and in persons with lower educational levels. Addressing the issue of weight misperception may help address the problem of obesity in the United States by increasing awareness of healthy weight levels, which may subsequently have an impact on weight‐related behavior change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ogden, C. L., Yanovski, S. Z., Carroll, M. D., & Flegal, K. M. (2007) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.052 · Cited by 1,561
Self-citationDisease and disadvantage in the United States and in England
Banks, J., Marmot, M., Oldfield, Z., & Smith, J. P. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.17.2037 · Cited by 807
Weight-related attitudes and behaviors of black women
Kumanyika, S., Wilson, J. F., & Guilford-Davenport, M. (1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92287-8 · Cited by 378
Cited by
Male Inclusion in Randomized Controlled Trials of Lifestyle Weight Loss Interventions
Pagoto, S. L., Schneider, K. L., Oleski, J. L., Luciani, J. M., Bodenlos, J. S., & Whited, M. C. (2012) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2011.140 · Cited by 388
Duncan, D. T., Wolin, K. Y., Scharoun-Lee, M., Ding, E. L., Warner, E. T., & Bennett, G. G. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-20 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorsey, R. R., Eberhardt, M. S., & Ogden, C. L.
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 790-795
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- OpenAlex
- W2090206689
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Racial/Ethnic Differences in Weight Perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/oby.2008.603
- The paper
- Dorsey, R. R., Eberhardt, M. S., & Ogden, C. L. (2009). Racial/Ethnic Differences in Weight Perception. Obesity. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.