Prediction of Fatness by Standing 8‐Electrode Bioimpedance: A Multiethnic Adolescent Population
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to validate an 8‐electrode bioimpedance analysis (BIA 8) device (BC‐418; Tanita, Tokyo, Japan) for use in populations of European, Maori, Pacific Island, and Asian adolescents. Healthy adolescents (215 M, 216 F; 129 Pacific Island, 120 Asian, 91 Maori, and 91 European; age range 12–19 years) were recruited by purposive sampling of high schools in Auckland, New Zealand. Weight, height, sitting height, leg length, waist circumference, and whole‐body impedance were measured. Fat mass (FM) and fat‐free mass (FFM) derived from the BIA 8 manufacturer's equations were compared with measurements by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA‐measured FFM was used as the reference to develop prediction equations based on impedance. A double cross‐validation technique was applied. BIA 8 underestimated FM by 2.06 kg (P < 0.0001) and percent body fat (%BF) by 2.84% (P < 0.0001), on average. However, BIA 8 tended to overestimate FM and %BF in lean and underestimate FM and %BF in fat individuals. Sex‐specific equations developed showed acceptable accuracy on cross‐validation. In the total sample, the best prediction equations were, for boys: FFM (kg) = 0.607 height (cm)2/impedance (Ω) + 1.542 age (y) + 0.220 height (cm) + 0.096 weight (kg) + 1.836 ethnicity (0 = European or Asian, 1 = Maori or Pacific) − 47.547, R2 = 0.93, standard error of estimate (SEE) = 3.09 kg; and, for girls: FFM (kg) = 0.531 height (cm)2/impedance (Ω) + 0.182 height (cm) + 0.096 weight (kg) + 1.562 ethnicity (0 = non‐Pacific, 1 = Pacific) − 15.782, R2 = 0.91, SEE = 2.19 kg. In conclusion, equations for fatness estimation using BIA 8 developed for our sample perform better than reliance on the manufacturer's estimates. The relationship between BIA and body composition in adolescents is ethnicity dependent.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regarding segmental technology for under 18 years old, five equations are suitable for both sexes.
“Regarding segmental technology, five are suitable for both sexes [43–45, 57, 74].”
From High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [74]
The Results (Table 2; page not available in our copy) give equations for both boys and girls using an eight-electrode bioimpedance device. But they are separate, sex-specific equations, not equations individually suitable for both sexes. This paper also does not establish the cited sentence’s total of five equations. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredConsidering segmental technology for under 18 years old, five equations are available for estimating FFM in both sexes.
“Considering segmental technology, five equations are available for estimating FFM in both sexes [43–45, 57, 74].”
From High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [74]
Out of the 19 equations for under 18 years old, seven were developed using segmental technology.
“Out of the 19 equations, 12 were developed using foot to hand technology [37, 55, 58, 59, 72, 73, 75, 76, 100] and seven equations were developed using segmental technology [43–45, 57, 74].”
From High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [74]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 85
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ministry of Health. Tracking the obesity epidemic: New Zealand 1977-2003. Public Health Intelligence Occasional Bulletin No 24. Ministry of Health: Wellington, 2004.
- Mallows CL. Some Comments on Cp. Technometrics 1973;15:661-675.
- Authors
- Sluyter, J. D., Schaaf, D., Scragg, R. K. R., & Plank, L. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Scragg, Robert K.R.
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-189
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- OpenAlex
- W2100263151
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Research Council of New Zealand
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
- Keywords
- fat-free mass, body composition, adolescents, multi-ethnic population, Māori adolescents, body fat percentage, Auckland, New Zealand adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Child, Female, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Absorptiometry, Photon, Electric Impedance, White People, Asian People, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, Overweight, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review