Dopamine for “Wanting” and Opioids for “Liking”: A Comparison of Obese Adults With and Without Binge Eating
Abstract
Obesity research suffers from an overinclusion paradigm whereby all participants with a BMI beyond a certain cutoff value (e.g., 30) are typically combined in a single group and compared to those of normal weight. There has been little attempt to identify meaningful subgroups defined by their salient biobehavioral differences. In order to address this limitation, we examined genetic and psychological indicators of hedonic eating in obese adults with ( n = 66) and without ( n = 70) binge eating disorder (BED). Our analyses focused on dopamine (DA) and opioid genetic markers because of their conjoint association with the functioning of brain reward mechanisms. We targeted three functional polymorphisms related to the D2 receptor ( DRD2 ) gene, as well as the functional A118G polymorphism of the mu‐opioid receptor ( OPRM1 ) gene. We found that significantly more obese controls had the “loss‐of‐function” A1 allele of Taq 1A compared to their BED counterparts, whereas the “gain‐of‐function” G allele of A118G occurred with greater frequency in the BED group. A significant gene–gene combination χ 2 analysis also indicated that of those participants with the gain‐gain genotype (G + and A1), 80% were in the BED group whereas only 35% with the loss‐loss genotype (G − and A1 + ) were in this group. Finally, BED subjects had significantly higher scores on a self‐report measure of hedonic eating. Our findings suggest that BED is a biologically based subtype of obesity and that the proneness to binge eating may be influenced by a hyper‐reactivity to the hedonic properties of food—a predisposition that is easily exploited in our current environment with its highly visible and easily accessible surfeit of sweet and fatty foods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comparing lean and obese subjects carrying different alleles of either the dopamine D2-receptor or μ-opioid receptor genes reveals differences in behavioral and neural responses to palatable food.
“Comparing lean and obese subjects carrying different alleles of either the dopamine D2-receptor or μ-opioid receptor genes does reveal differences in behavioral and neural responses to palatable food ([39](#B39), [40](#B40), [60](#B60), [172](#B172)).”
From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [40]
There is a considerable body of literature demonstrating differences in reward functions between lean and obese animals and humans.
“There is a considerable body of literature demonstrating differences in reward functions between lean and obese animals and humans ([40](#B40), [162](#B162), [173](#B173), [174](#B174)).”
From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 314
- Authors
- Davis, C. A., Levitan, R. D., Reid, C., Carter, J. C., Kaplan, A. S., Patte, K. A., King, N., Curtis, C., & Kennedy, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Davis, Caroline A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1220-1225
- ISSN
- 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-739X
- OpenAlex
- W2058328612
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 24.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Keywords
- binge eating disorder, hedonic eating, dopamine, opioid system, DRD2 gene, A118G polymorphism, TaqI polymorphism, gene-gene interaction, reward processing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Appetite, Dietary Fats, Dopamine, Female, Food Preferences, Gene Frequency, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Genetic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Case-Control Studies, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Opioid Peptides, Dietary Sucrose, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Bulimia Nervosa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review