Cited by 94Regulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Neural responses to visual food stimuli after a normal vs. higher protein breakfast in breakfast-skipping teens: a pilot fMRI study

Open access
Leidy, Heather J., Lepping, Rebecca J., Savage, Cary R., Harris, Corey T.·2011·Obesity

Abstract

This functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) pilot study identified whether breakfast consumption would alter the neural activity in brain regions associated with food motivation and reward in overweight "breakfast skipping" (BS) adolescent girls and examined whether increased protein at breakfast would lead to additional alterations. Ten girls (Age: 15 ± 1 years; BMI percentile 93 ± 1%; BS 5 ± 1×/week) completed 3 testing days. Following the BS day, the participants were provided with, in randomized order, normal protein (NP; 18 ± 1 g protein) or higher protein (HP; 50 ± 1 g protein) breakfast meals to consume at home for 6 days. On day 7 of each pattern, the participants came to the laboratory to consume their respective breakfast followed by appetite questionnaires and an fMRI brain scan to identify brain activation responses to viewing food vs. nonfood images prior to lunch. Breakfast consumption led to enduring (i.e., 3-h post breakfast) reductions in neural activation in the hippocampus, amygdala, cingulate, and parahippocampus vs. BS. HP led to enduring reductions in insula and middle prefrontal cortex activation vs. NP. Hippocampal, amygdala, cingulate, and insular activations were correlated with appetite and inversely correlated with satiety. In summary, the addition of breakfast led to alterations in brain activation in regions previously associated with food motivation and reward with additional alterations following the higher-protein breakfast. These data suggest that increased dietary protein at breakfast might be a beneficial strategy to reduce reward-driven eating behavior in overweight teen girls. Due to the small sample size, caution is warranted when interpreting these preliminary findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2011.108

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimentally manipulated caloric deprivation increases responsivity of brain regions implicated in attention and reward to food images.

    “Yet, experimentally manipulated caloric deprivation increases responsivity of brain regions implicated in attention and reward to food images”
  • fMRI experiments indicate that activation in attention, reward valuation, memory, and homeostatic feeding regions is significantly greater in response to pictures of palatable foods versus non-food control images after caloric deprivation versus a no deprivation condition.

    “activation in regions that have been implicated in attention (anterior cingulate cortex), reward valuation (amygdala), memory (hippocampus), and homeostatic feeding (hypothalamus) was significantly greater in response to pictures of palatable foods versus non-food control images after caloric deprivation versus a no deprivation condition”
  • The evidence that elective caloric restriction in the present studies was associated with greater responsivity of attention and reward regions to palatable food images, anticipated receipt of palatable food, and receipt of palatable food extends findings from caloric deprivation experiments.

    “The evidence that elective caloric restriction in the present studies was associated with greater responsivity of attention and reward regions to palatable food images, anticipated receipt of palatable food, and receipt of palatable food more broadly extend findings from caloric deprivation experiments.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 94

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Leidy HJ Racki EM The addition of a protein-rich breakfast and its effects on acute appetite control and food intake in ‘breakfast-skipping’ adolescents Int J Obes (Lond) 2010 34 1125 1133 20125103 PMC4263815

Authors
Leidy, H. J., Lepping, R. J., Savage, C. R., & Harris, C. T.
Affiliations
University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Leidy, Heather J.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
2019-2025
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2031933343
Cited by
94
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD052027)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
breakfast skipping, dietary protein, food motivation, food reward, hippocampus, amygdala, insula, appetite, satiety, adolescent overweight, adolescent girls, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Appetite, Brain, Brain Mapping, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motivation, Photic Stimulation, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Satiety Response, Body Mass Index, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review