Cited by 64Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

One‐Year Results of the Think Health! Study of Weight Management in Primary Care Practices

Kumanyika, Shiriki K., Fassbender, Jennifer E., Sarwer, David B., Phipps, Etienne, Allison, Kelly C., Localio, Russell, Morales, Knashawn H., Wesby, Lisa +6 more·2012·Obesity

Abstract

The Think Health! study evaluated a behavioral weight loss program adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention to assist primary care providers (PCPs) and auxiliary staff acting as lifestyle coaches (LCs) in offering weight loss counseling to their patients. In a randomized trial conducted at five clinical sites, study participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio within each site to either “Basic Plus” (n= 137), which offered PCP counseling every 4 months plus monthly LC visits during the first year of treatment, or “Basic” (n= 124), which offered only PCP counseling every 4 months. Participants were primarily (84%) female, 65% African American, 16% Hispanic American, and 19% white. In the 72% of participants in each treatment group with a 12‐month weight measurement, mean (95% CI) 1‐year weight changes (kg) were −1.61 (−2.68, −0.53) in Basic Plus and −0.62 (−1.45, 0.20) in Basic (difference: 0.98 (−0.36, 2.33);P= 0.15). Results were similar in model‐based estimates using all available weight data for randomized participants, adjusting for potential confounders. More Basic Plus (22.5%) than Basic (10.2%) participants lost ≥5% of their baseline weight (P= 0.022). In a descriptive, nonrandomized analysis that also considered incomplete visit attendance, mean weight change was −3.3 kg in Basic Plus participants who attended ≥5 LC visits vs. + 0.53 kg in those attending <5 LC visits. We conclude that the Basic Plus approach of moderate‐intensity counseling by PCPs and their staff can facilitate modest weight loss, with clinically significant weight loss in high program attenders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/oby.2011.329

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term weight loss in the enhanced lifestyle counseling group and in the brief lifestyle counseling group was greater than weight loss observed in other primary care trials, with the exception of a study involving extremely obese patients treated with intensive group lifestyle modification and weight-loss medications.

    “Long-term weight loss in the group that received enhanced lifestyle counseling (as well as in the group that received brief lifestyle counseling without enhancement) was greater than weight loss observed in other primary care trials,5–7,30,31 with the exception of a study involving extremely obese patients who were treated with intensive group lifestyle modification and weight-loss medications.32”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumanyika, S. K., Fassbender, J. E., Sarwer, D. B., Phipps, E., Allison, K. C., Localio, R., Morales, K. H., Wesby, L., Harralson, T., Kessler, R., Tan‐Torres, S., Han, X., Tsai, A. G., & Wadden, T. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Einstein Healthcare Network (US)
Corresponding author
Kumanyika, Shiriki K.
Venue
Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
1249-1257
ISSN
  • 1930-7381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-739X
OpenAlex
W2146059675
Cited by
64
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institutes of Health (5p60md000209-05)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60 MD000209-05)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD043459)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
weight management, weight loss counseling, lifestyle coaching, primary care, behavioral weight loss program, weight loss outcomes, program attendance
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Pennsylvania, Primary Health Care, Philadelphia, Weight Loss, Exercise, Risk Reduction Behavior, White People, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review