The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acquired cancer stem cell phenotypes through Oct4-mediated dedifferentiation
Open accessAbstract
There is enormous interest to target cancer stem cells (CSCs) for clinical treatment because these cells are highly tumorigenic and resistant to chemotherapy. Oct4 is expressed by CSC-like cells in different types of cancer. However, function of Oct4 in tumor cells is unclear. In this study, we showed that expression of Oct4 gene or transmembrane delivery of Oct4 protein promoted dedifferentiation of melanoma cells to CSC-like cells. The dedifferentiated melanoma cells showed significantly decreased expression of melanocytic markers and acquired the ability to form tumor spheroids. They showed markedly increased resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and hypoxic injury. In the subcutaneous xenograft and tail vein injection assays, these cells had significantly increased tumorigenic capacity. The dedifferentiated melanoma cells acquired features associated with CSCs such as multipotent differentiation capacity and expression of melanoma CSC markers such as ABCB5 and CD271. Mechanistically, Oct4-induced dedifferentiation was associated with increased expression of endogenous Oct4, Nanog and Klf4, and global gene expression changes that enriched for transcription factors. RNAi-mediated knockdown of Oct4 in dedifferentiated cells led to diminished CSC phenotypes. Oct4 expression in melanoma was regulated by hypoxia and its expression was detected in a sub-population of melanoma cells in clinical samples. Our data indicate that Oct4 is a positive regulator of tumor dedifferentiation. The results suggest that CSC phenotype is dynamic and may be acquired through dedifferentiation. Oct4-mediated tumor cell dedifferentiation may have an important role during tumor progression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
Disease-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Park, I.-H., Arora, N., Huo, H., Maherali, N., Ahfeldt, T., Shimamura, A., Lensch, M. W., Cowan, C., Hochedlinger, K., & Daley, G. Q. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.041 · Cited by 2,196
Linking the p53 tumour suppressor pathway to somatic cell reprogramming
Kawamura, T., Suzuki, J., Wang, Y. V., Menendez, S., Morera, L. B., Raya, A., Wahl, G. M., & Belmonte, J. C. I. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08311 · Cited by 1,115
Jögi, A., Øra, I., Nilsson, H., Lindeheim, Å., Makino, Y., Poellinger, L., Axelson, H., & Påhlman, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.102660199 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Gene Regulation by Long Non-Coding RNA
Dykes, I. M., & Emanueli, C. (2017) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2016.12.005 · Cited by 914
Cancer stem cells: advances in knowledge and implications for cancer therapy
Chu, X., Tian, W., Ning, J., Xiao, G., Zhou, Y., Wang, Z., Zhai, Z., Tanzhu, G., Yang, J., & Zhou, R. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01851-y · Cited by 553
Cancer stem cell (CSC) resistance drivers
Najafi, M., Mortezaee, K., & Majidpoor, J. (2019) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116781 · Cited by 466
Cancer stem cells and chemoresistance: The smartest survives the raid
Zhao, J. (2016) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.02.008 · Cited by 437
Stemness and chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells under shear stress
Ip, C. K. M., Li, S.-S., Tang, M. Y. H., Sy, S. K. H., Ren, Y., Shum, H. C., & Wong, A. S. T. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26788 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, S. M., Liu, S., Lu, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, P. J., Gimotty, P. A., Guerra, M., Guo, W., & Xu, X.
- Venue
- Oncogene
- Published
- 2012-01-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 4898-4911
- ISSN
- 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5594
- OpenAlex
- W2024145520
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.