Cited by 104Nutrition and Health StudiesComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Why US children use dietary supplements

Open access
Bailey, Regan L., Gahche, Jaime J., Thomas, Paul R., Dwyer, Johanna T.·2013·Pediatric Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary supplements are used by one-third of children. We examined motivations for supplement use in children, the types of products used by motivations, and the role of physicians and health care practitioners in guiding choices about supplements. METHODS: We examined motivations for dietary supplement use reported for children (from birth to 19 y of age; n = 8,245) using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2010. RESULTS: Dietary supplements were used by 31% of children; many different reasons were given as follows: to "improve overall health" (41%), to "maintain health" (37%), for "supplementing the diet" (23%), to "prevent health problems" (20%), and to "boost immunity" (14%). Most children (~90%) who use dietary supplements use a multivitamin-mineral or multivitamin product. Supplement users tend to be non-Hispanic white, have higher family incomes, report more physical activity, and have health insurance. Only a small group of supplements used by children (15%) were based on the recommendation of a physician or other health care provider. CONCLUSION: Most supplements used by children are not under the recommendation of a health care provider. The most common reasons for use of supplements in children are for health promotion, yet little scientific data support this notion in nutrient-replete children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/pr.2013.160

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The benefit of vitamins for well-nourished children has yet to be established.

    “Indeed, the benefit of vitamins for well-nourished children has yet to be established (Bailey et al., 2013).”

    From The Child Labor in Social Media: Kidfluencers, Ethics of Care, and Exploitation (2025) · cites this paper as Bailey et al., 2013

  • With artificial intelligence, online content can be used as training data that enables malevolent individuals to mimic a kidfluencer's voice, likeness, and behavior.

    “With artificial intelligence (AI), online content can be used as training data that enables malevolent individuals to mimic a kidfluencer's voice, likeness, and behavior.8”

    From The Child Labor in Social Media: Kidfluencers, Ethics of Care, and Exploitation (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Methods and Discussion sections address children’s dietary supplement use; their references to screen time concern its relationship to supplement use. Searches for AI training data, kidfluencers, and voice cloning found no passage about using online content to mimic a child’s voice, likeness, or behavior. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey, R. L., Gahche, J. J., Thomas, P. R., & Dwyer, J. T.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Bailey, Regan L.
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
2013-09-03
Volume
74
Issue
6
Pages
737-741
ISSN
  • 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0447
OpenAlex
W2094537090
Cited by
104
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
dietary supplements, children, multivitamin and mineral supplements, physician recommendations, health promotion, health insurance, socioeconomic factors, physical activity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Nutrition Surveys, United States, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review