Cited by 102Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Daratumumab monotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study (CENTAURUS)

Open access
Landgren, C. Ola, Chari, Ajai, Cohen, Yael C., Spencer, Andrew, Voorhees, Peter, Estell, Jane A., Sandhu, Irwindeep, Jenner, Matthew W. +13 more·2020·Leukemia

Abstract

Current guidelines for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) recommend active monitoring until the onset of multiple myeloma (MM) before initiating treatment or enrollment in a clinical trial. Earlier intervention may delay progression to MM. In CENTAURUS, 123 patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk SMM were randomly assigned to daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously on extended intense (intense), extended intermediate (intermediate), or short dosing schedules. At the prespecified primary analysis (15.8-month median follow-up), the complete response (CR) rates (co-primary endpoint) were 2.4%, 4.9%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively; the co-primary endpoint of CR rate >15% was not met. Progressive disease (PD)/death rates (number of patients who progressed or died divided by total duration of progression-free survival [PFS] in patient-years; co-primary endpoint) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.055 (80% confidence interval [CI], 0.014–0.096), 0.102 (80% CI, 0.044–0.160), and 0.206 (80% CI, 0.118–0.295), respectively, translating to a median PFS ≥24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, and =0.0213, respectively). With longer follow-up (median follow-up, 25.9 months), CR rates were 4.9%, 9.8%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. PD/death rates for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.059 (80% CI, 0.025–0.092), 0.107 (80% CI, 0.058–0.155), and 0.150 (80% CI, 0.089–0.211), respectively, again translating to a median PFS ≥ 24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001 for all arms). Twenty-four–month PFS rates were 89.9% (90% CI, 78.5–95.4%), 82.0% (90% CI, 69.0–89.9%), and 75.3% (90% CI, 61.1–85.0%) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that intense dosing maintained target-saturating trough concentrations in most patients throughout weekly, every-2-week, and every-4-week dosing periods. No new safety signals were observed. These data provide the basis for an ongoing phase 3 study of daratumumab in SMM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41375-020-0718-z

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Either decreased efficacy of the immune system or selection of more aggressive and fit clones will eventually allow MGUS/SMM to progress into MM.

    “Either the decreased efficacy of the immune system or the selection of more aggressive and fit clones will eventually allow the MGUS/SMM to progress into MM.76,78,79,104”

    From Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as [104]

    The Introduction (page not available) says that MM can evolve from SMM and that most patients with high- or intermediate-risk SMM progress to MM. It does not establish that progression is inevitable, address MGUS progression, or attribute progression to declining immune efficacy or selection of more aggressive clones. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [1]Rajkumar SV Landgren O Mateos MV Smoldering multiple myeloma Blood 2015 125 3069 75 10.1182/blood-2014-09-568899 25838344 PMC4432003 · DOI
  2. [2]Landgren O Kyle RA Pfeiffer RM Katzmann JA Caporaso NE Hayes RB Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study Blood 2009 113 5412 7 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241 19179464 PMC2689042 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Dispenzieri A Kyle R Katzmann JA Therneau TM Larson D Benson J Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma Blood 2008 111 785 9 10.1182/blood-2007-08-108357 17942755 PMC2200851 · DOI
  4. [4]Lakshman A Rajkumar SV Buadi FK Binder M Gertz MA Lacy MQ Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma incorporating revised IMWG diagnostic criteria Blood Cancer J 2018 8 59 10.1038/s41408-018-0077-4 29895887 PMC5997745 · DOI
  5. [5]Perez-Persona E Vidriales MB Mateo G Garcia-Sanz R Mateos M-V Garcia de Coca A New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells Blood 2007 110 2586 92 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088443 17576818 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Rajkumar SV Dimopoulos MA Palumbo A Blade J Merlini G Mateos MV International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma Lancet Oncol 2014 15 e538 48 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5 25439696 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]Mateos MV Hernandez MT Giraldo P de la Rubia J de Arriba F Corral LL Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus observation in patients with high-risk smouldering multiple myeloma (QuiRedex): long-term follow-up of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 2016 17 1127 36 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30124-3 27402145 · DOI
  8. [9]Lin P Owens R Tricot G Wilson CS Flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis of 306 cases of multiple myeloma Am J Clin Pathol 2004 121 482 8 10.1309/74R4TB90BUWH27JX 15080299 · DOI
  9. [10]Santonocito AM Consoli U Bagnato S Milone G Palumbo GA Di Raimondo F Flow cytometric detection of aneuploid CD38(++) plasmacells and CD19(+) B-lymphocytes in bone marrow, peripheral blood and PBSC harvest in multiple myeloma patients Leuk Res 2004 28 469 77 10.1016/j.leukres.2003.09.015 15068900 · DOI
  10. [11]de Weers M Tai YT van der Veer MS Bakker JM Vink T Jacobs DC Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors J Immunol 2011 186 1840 8 10.4049/jimmunol.1003032 21187443 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [13]Overdijk MB Verploegen S Bogels M van Egmond M Lammerts van Bueren JJ Mutis T Antibody-mediated phagocytosis contributes to the anti-tumor activity of the therapeutic antibody daratumumab in lymphoma and multiple myeloma MAbs 2015 7 311 21 10.1080/19420862.2015.1007813 25760767 PMC4622648 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [14]van de Donk NWCJ Janmaat ML Mutis T Lammerts van Bueren JJ Ahmadi T Sasser AK Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 in hematological malignancies and beyond Immunol Rev 2016 270 95 112 10.1111/imr.12389 26864107 PMC4755228 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [15]Krejcik J Casneuf T Nijhof IS Verbist B Bald J Plesner T Daratumumab depletes CD38+ immune-regulatory cells, promotes T-cell expansion, and skews T-cell repertoire in multiple myeloma Blood 2016 128 384 94 10.1182/blood-2015-12-687749 27222480 PMC4957162 · DOI
  14. [16]Overdijk MB Jansen JH Nederend M Lammerts van Bueren JJ Groen RW Parren PW The therapeutic CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab induces programmed cell death via Fcgamma receptor-mediated cross-linking J Immunol 2016 197 807 13 10.4049/jimmunol.1501351 27316683 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [19]Brighton TA Khot A Harrison SJ Ghez D Weiss BM Kirsch A Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of siltuximab in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma Clin Cancer Res 2019 25 3772 5 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3470 30890552 · DOI
  16. [20]Dispenzieri A Stewart AK Chanan-Khan A Rajkumar SV Kyle RA Fonseca R Smoldering multiple myeloma requiring treatment: time for a new definition? Blood 2013 122 4172 81 10.1182/blood-2013-08-520890 24144641 PMC3952477 · DOI
  17. [21]Durie BGM Harousseau JL Miguel JS Blade J Barlogie B Anderson K International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma Leukemia 2006 20 1467 73 10.1038/sj.leu.2404284 16855634 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [22]Rajkumar SV Harousseau JL Durie B Anderson KC Dimopoulos M Kyle R Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1 Blood 2011 117 4691 5 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487 21292775 PMC3710442 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [23]McCudden C Axel AE Slaets D Dejoie T Clemens PL Frans S Monitoring multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab: teasing out monoclonal antibody interference Clin Chem Lab Med 2016 54 1095 104 10.1515/cclm-2015-1031 27028734 · DOI
  20. [25]Ghosh A Mailankody S Giralt SA Landgren CO Smith EL Brentjens RJ CAR T cell therapy for multiple myeloma: where are we now and where are we headed? Leuk Lymphoma 2018 59 2056 67 10.1080/10428194.2017.1393668 29105517 PMC5936668 · DOI
  21. [26]Ravi P Kumar S Larsen JT Gonsalves W Buadi F Lacy MQ Evolving changes in disease biomarkers and risk of early progression in smoldering multiple myeloma Blood Cancer J 2016 6 e454 10.1038/bcj.2016.65 27471870 PMC5030386 · DOI
  22. [27]Fernandez de Larrea C Isola I Pereira A Cibeira MT Magnano L Tovar N Evolving M-protein pattern in patients with smoldering multiple myeloma: impact on early progression Leukemia 2018 32 1427 34 10.1038/s41375-018-0013-4 29463830 · DOI
  23. [28]Wu V Moshier E Leng S Barlogie B Cho HJ Jagannath S Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma: predictive value of free light chains and group-based trajectory modeling Blood Adv 2018 2 1470 9 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016998 29945937 PMC6020804 · DOI
  24. [29]Landgren O Shall we treat smoldering multiple myeloma in the near future? Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2017 2017 194 204 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.194 PMC6142564 29222256 · DOI
  25. [30]Korde N Roschewski M Zingone A Kwok M Manasanch EE Bhutani M Treatment with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone with lenalidomide extension in patients with smoldering or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma JAMA Oncol 2015 1 746 54 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2010 26181891 PMC6662597 · DOI
  26. [32]Lonial S Jacobus SJ Weiss M Kumar S Orlowski RZ Kaufman JL E3A06: Randomized phase III trial of lenalidomide versus observation alone in patients with asymptomatic high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol 2019 37 8001 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8001 PMC7145586 31652094 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [33]Xu XS Yan X Puchalski T Lonial S Lokhorst HM Voorhees PM Clinical implications of complex pharmacokinetics for daratumumab dose regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma Clin Pharm Ther 2017 101 721 4 10.1002/cpt.577 PMC5485722 27859027 · DOI
  28. [34]Clemens PL Yan X Lokhorst HM Lonial S Losic N Khan I Pharmacokinetics of daratumumab following intravenous infusion in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after prior proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug treatment Clin Pharmacokinet 2016 56 915 24 10.1007/s40262-016-0477-1 PMC5511594 27896689 · DOI
  29. [35]Yan X Clemens PL Puchalski T Lonial S Lokhorst HM Orlowski RZ Target-mediated drug disposition of daratumumab following intravenous infusion in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after prior proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs: a population pharmacokinetic analysis Blood 2015 126 4222 10.1182/blood.V126.23.4222.4222 PMC5511594 27896689 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landgren, C. O., Chari, A., Cohen, Y. C., Spencer, A., Voorhees, P., Estell, J. A., Sandhu, I., Jenner, M. W., Williams, C., Cavo, M., van de Donk, N. W. C. J., Beksac, M., Moreau, P., Goldschmidt, H., Kuppens, S., Bandekar, R., Clemens, P. L., Neff, T., Heuck, C., Qi, M., & Hofmeister, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Levine Cancer Institute (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Hofmeister, Craig C.
Venue
Leukemia
Published
2020-02-05
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1840-1852
ISSN
  • 0887-6924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5551
OpenAlex
W3005289851
Cited by
102
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Leukemia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Janssen Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
daratumumab, smoldering multiple myeloma, progression-free survival, complete response, dosing regimen, progression to multiple myeloma
MeSH terms
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Survival Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review