Cited by 35SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesAnimal Virus Infections Studies

Strong attenuation of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and increased replication of the BA.5 subvariant in human cardiomyocytes

Open access
Nchioua, Rayhane, Diofano, Federica, Noettger, Sabrina, von Maltitz, Pascal, Stenger, Steffen, Zech, Fabian, Münch, Jan, Sparrer, Konstantin M. J. +2 more·2022·Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Abstract

Since its first description in South Africa in November 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant rapidly outcompeted the previously dominating Delta variant. Omicron is the fifth variant of concern (VOC). It contains an unusually high number of mutations compared to previous VOCs, especially in the viral Spike protein, and shows high transmissibility and efficient escape of neutralizing antibodies. Due to these characteristics, it received this designation much faster than the four previous VOCs Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta. However, the original BA.1 Omicron variant seems to be less pathogenic than early SARS-CoV-2 strains and other VOCs. 1 While SARS-CoV-2 primarily infects the respiratory tract, Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is a multi-organ disease, and patients show infection and disorders in the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and neurological systems. Thus, the ability of the various SARS-CoV-2 variants to infect and propagate in different cell types and organs clearly plays a key role in viral pathogenicity. Especially, cardiomyocytes express high levels of the primary SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 and are highly permissive for viral replication. 2

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41392-022-01256-9

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delta may have been more effective at inducing myocarditis than Omicron.

    “These findings suggest that Delta may have been more affective at inducing myocarditis than Omicron.”

    From COVID-19, Myocarditis and Pericarditis (2023) · cites this paper as [111]

    In the Dear Editor section (page not specified), Delta caused stronger cytopathic effects and higher proinflammatory cytokine levels in human cardiomyocyte cultures than Omicron BA.1. The authors infer that BA.1 may be less likely to cause cardiac injury, but they did not measure myocarditis in patients; their comparison also does not extend to all Omicron subvariants, since BA.5 showed features more similar to Delta. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nchioua, R., Diofano, F., Noettger, S., von Maltitz, P., Stenger, S., Zech, F., Münch, J., Sparrer, K. M. J., Just, S., & Kirchhoff, F.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Kirchhoff, Frank
Venue
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
Published
2022-12-25
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
395-395
ISSN
2059-3635 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312128567
Cited by
35
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OPen Access Repositorium der Universität Ulm (OPARU) (Ulm University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universität Ulm, Kommunikations- und Informationszentrum (kiz) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 1279, CRC 1506)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Restrict SARS-CoV-2, IMMUNOMOD)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
Omicron variant, Omicron BA.1, Omicron BA.5, cardiomyocytes, viral replication, viral attenuation, pathogenicity, ACE2 receptor, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, viral pathogenesis
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Myocytes, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review