The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle
Open accessAbstract
A critical step in the biogeochemical cycle of sulfur on Earth is microbial sulfate reduction, yet organisms from relatively few lineages have been implicated in this process. Previous studies using functional marker genes have detected abundant, novel dissimilatory sulfite reductases (DsrAB) that could confer the capacity for microbial sulfite/sulfate reduction but were not affiliated with known organisms. Thus, the identity of a significant fraction of sulfate/sulfite-reducing microbes has remained elusive. Here we report the discovery of the capacity for sulfate/sulfite reduction in the genomes of organisms from 13 bacterial and archaeal phyla, thereby more than doubling the number of microbial phyla associated with this process. Eight of the 13 newly identified groups are candidate phyla that lack isolated representatives, a finding only possible given genomes from metagenomes. Organisms from Verrucomicrobia and two candidate phyla, Candidatus Rokubacteria and Candidatus Hydrothermarchaeota, contain some of the earliest evolved dsrAB genes. The capacity for sulfite reduction has been laterally transferred in multiple events within some phyla, and a key gene potentially capable of modulating sulfur metabolism in associated cells has been acquired by putatively symbiotic bacteria. We conclude that current functional predictions based on phylogeny significantly underestimate the extent of sulfate/sulfite reduction across Earth’s ecosystems. Understanding the prevalence of this capacity is integral to interpreting the carbon cycle because sulfate reduction is often coupled to turnover of buried organic carbon. Our findings expand the diversity of microbial groups associated with sulfur transformations in the environment and motivate revision of biogeochemical process models based on microbial community composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accelerated Profile HMM Searches
Eddy, S. R. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · Cited by 6,975
The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction
Yang, J., Yan, R., Roy, A., Xu, D., Poisson, J., & Zhang, Y. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3213 · Cited by 5,596
Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria
Brown, C. T., Hug, L. A., Thomas, B. C., Sharon, I., Castelle, C. J., Singh, A., Wilkins, M. J., Wrighton, K. C., Williams, K. H., & Banfield, J. F. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14486 · Cited by 1,216 · cited 6×
“CPR organisms are common in aquifers where conditions oscillate between oxic and anoxic [24, 26].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationProterozoic Ocean Chemistry and Evolution: A Bioinorganic Bridge?
Anbar, A. D., & Knoll, A. H. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069651 · Cited by 1,191
Domain Evolution and Functional Diversification of Sulfite Reductases
Dhillon, A., Goswami, S., Riley, M., Teske, A., & Sogin, M. (2005) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2005.5.18 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Accurate and complete genomes from metagenomes
Chen, L.-X., Anantharaman, K., Shaiber, A., Eren, A. M., & Banfield, J. F. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.258640.119 · Cited by 401
Self-citationUnifying the known and unknown microbial coding sequence space
Vanni, C., Schechter, M. S., Acinas, S. G., Barberán, A., Buttigieg, P. L., Casamayor, E. O., Delmont, T. O., Duarte, C. M., Eren, A. M., Finn, R. D., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.67667 · Cited by 134
Stepwise pathway for early evolutionary assembly of dissimilatory sulfite and sulfate reduction
Neukirchen, S., Pereira, I. A. C., & Sousa, F. L. (2023) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-023-01477-y · Cited by 70
The evolution and spread of sulfur cycling enzymes reflect the redox state of the early Earth
Mateos, K., Chappell, G., Klos, A., Le, B., Boden, J., Stüeken, E., & Anderson, R. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade4847 · Cited by 43
Structural evolution of the ancient enzyme, dissimilatory sulfite reductase
Colman, D. R., Labesse, G., Swapna, G. V. T., Stefanakis, J., Montelione, G. T., Boyd, E. S., & Royer, C. A. (2022) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26315 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Anantharaman, K., Hausmann, B., Jungbluth, S. P., Kantor, R. S., Lavy, A., Warren, L. A., Rappé, M. S., Pester, M., Loy, A., Thomas, B. C., & Banfield, J. F.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-02-21
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1715-1728
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W2789511815
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 30.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41396-018-0078-0
- The paper
- Anantharaman, K., Hausmann, B., Jungbluth, S. P., Kantor, R. S., Lavy, A., Warren, L. A., Rappé, M. S., Pester, M., Loy, A., Thomas, B. C., & Banfield, J. F. (2018). Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0078-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.