The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental heterogeneity determines the ecological processes that govern bacterial metacommunity assembly in a floodplain river system
Open accessAbstract
How diversity is structured has been a central goal of microbial ecology. In freshwater ecosystems, selection has been found to be the main driver shaping bacterial communities. However, its relative importance compared with other processes (dispersal, drift, diversification) may depend on spatial heterogeneity and the dispersal rates within a metacommunity. Still, a decrease in the role of selection is expected with increasing dispersal homogenization. Here, we investigate the main ecological processes modulating bacterial assembly in contrasting scenarios of environmental heterogeneity. We carried out a spatiotemporal survey in the floodplain system of the Paraná River. The bacterioplankton metacommunity was studied using both statistical inferences based on phylogenetic and taxa turnover as well as co-occurrence networks. We found that selection was the main process determining community assembly even at both extremes of environmental heterogeneity and homogeneity, challenging the general view that the strength of selection is weakened due to dispersal homogenization. The ecological processes acting on the community also determined the connectedness of bacterial networks associations. Heterogeneous selection promoted more interconnected networks increasing β-diversity. Finally, spatiotemporal heterogeneity was an important factor determining the number and identity of the most highly connected taxa in the system. Integrating all these empirical evidences, we propose a new conceptual model that elucidates how the environmental heterogeneity determines the action of the ecological processes shaping the bacterial metacommunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x · Cited by 13,828
Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization
Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1272 · Cited by 7,903
Distance‐Based Tests for Homogeneity of Multivariate Dispersions
Anderson, M. J. (2006) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00440.x · Cited by 3,304
Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities
Barberán, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., & Fierer, N. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.119 · Cited by 3,044
Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea
Herlemann, D. P. R., Labrenz, M., Jürgens, K., Bertilsson, S., Waniek, J. J., & Andersson, A. F. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.41 · Cited by 2,885
Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome
Faust, K., Sathirapongsasuti, J. F., Izard, J., Segata, N., Gevers, D., Raes, J., & Huttenhower, C. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606 · Cited by 1,527
Global patterns of bacterial beta-diversity in seafloor and seawater ecosystems
Zinger, L., Amaral-Zettler, L. A., Fuhrman, J. A., Horner-Devine, M. C., Huse, S. M., Welch, D. B. M., Martiny, J. B. H., Sogin, M., Boetius, A., & Ramette, A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024570 · Cited by 643
Cited by
Linking soil fungi to bacterial community assembly in arid ecosystems
Jiao, S., Chu, H., Zhang, B., Wei, X., Chen, W., & Wei, G. (2022) · iMeta · doi:10.1002/imt2.2 · Cited by 284
Wu, E., Wang, K., Liu, Z., Wang, J., Yan, H., Zhu, X., Zhu, X., & Chen, B. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c07020 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Huber, P., Metz, S., Unrein, F., Mayora, G., Sarmento, H., & Devercelli, M.
- Venue
- The ISME Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-07-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2951-2966
- ISSN
- 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7370
- OpenAlex
- W3043996931
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental heterogeneity determines the ecological processes that govern bacterial metacommunity assembly in a floodplain river system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41396-020-0723-2
- The paper
- Huber, P., Metz, S., Unrein, F., Mayora, G., Sarmento, H., & Devercelli, M. (2020). Environmental heterogeneity determines the ecological processes that govern bacterial metacommunity assembly in a floodplain river system. The ISME Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-0723-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.