Cited by 2,885Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea

Open access
Herlemann, Daniel P R, Labrenz, Matthias, Jürgens, Klaus, Bertilsson, Stefan, Waniek, Joanna J, Andersson, Anders F·2011·The ISME Journal

Abstract

Salinity is a major factor controlling the distribution of biota in aquatic systems, and most aquatic multicellular organisms are either adapted to life in saltwater or freshwater conditions. Consequently, the saltwater–freshwater mixing zones in coastal or estuarine areas are characterized by limited faunal and floral diversity. Although changes in diversity and decline in species richness in brackish waters is well documented in aquatic ecology, it is unknown to what extent this applies to bacterial communities. Here, we report a first detailed bacterial inventory from vertical profiles of 60 sampling stations distributed along the salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea, one of world's largest brackish water environments, generated using 454 pyrosequencing of partial (400 bp) 16S rRNA genes. Within the salinity gradient, bacterial community composition altered at broad and finer-scale phylogenetic levels. Analogous to faunal communities within brackish conditions, we identified a bacterial brackish water community comprising a diverse combination of freshwater and marine groups, along with populations unique to this environment. As water residence times in the Baltic Sea exceed 3 years, the observed bacterial community cannot be the result of mixing of fresh water and saltwater, but our study represents the first detailed description of an autochthonous brackish microbiome. In contrast to the decline in the diversity of multicellular organisms, reduced bacterial diversity at brackish conditions could not be established. It is possible that the rapid adaptation rate of bacteria has enabled a variety of lineages to fill what for higher organisms remains a challenging and relatively unoccupied ecological niche.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ismej.2011.41

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ovigerous females remain in dense populations crawling on the walls of active chimneys during the entire brooding period.

    “Since ovigerous females remain in dense populations crawling on the walls of active chimneys during the entire brooding period (Hernández-Ávila, 2016)”

    From Is It First the Egg or the Shrimp? – Diversity and Variation in Microbial Communities Colonizing Broods of the Vent Shrimp Rimicaris exoculata During Embryonic Development (2019) · cites this paper as Hernández-Ávila, 2016

    The Results and discussion passages concern Baltic Sea bacterial communities and salinity, not ovigerous females or active chimneys (page unavailable). Searches for the quoted wording and for brooding females at hydrothermal vent chimneys found no passage addressing the claim. The citing sentence names Hernández-Ávila (2016), rather than this source paper. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hayek LAC, Buzas MA. (1996). Surveying Natural Popula- tions. Columbia University Press: New York, NY.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herlemann, D. P. R., Labrenz, M., Jürgens, K., Bertilsson, S., Waniek, J. J., & Andersson, A. F.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde (DE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
Venue
The ISME Journal
Published
2011-04-07
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
1571-1579
ISSN
  • 1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7370
OpenAlex
W2114766231
Cited by
2,885
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 220 · 2025: 261 · 2024: 319 · 2023: 313 · 2022: 321 · 2021: 332 · 2020: 273 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 141 · 2016: 116 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 19
FWCI
29.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The ISME Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
bacterial communities, salinity gradient, brackish water, Baltic Sea, 16S rRNA gene diversity, bacterial community composition, bacterial adaptation, niche occupancy, estuarine microbiology
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Baltic States, Fresh Water, Oceans and Seas, Phylogeny, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Seawater, Biodiversity, Salinity, Biota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review