Cited by 120Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchCancer Mechanisms and TherapyPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase I studies of AZD1208, a proviral integration Moloney virus kinase inhibitor in solid and haematological cancers

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proviral integration Moloney virus (PIM) kinases (PIM1, 2 and 3) are overexpressed in several tumour types and contribute to oncogenesis. AZD1208 is a potent ATP-competitive PIM kinase inhibitor investigated in patients with recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Two dose-escalation studies were performed to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), of AZD1208 in AML and solid tumours. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy of AZD1208. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients received treatment: 32 in the AML study over a 120-900 mg dose range, and 25 in the solid tumour study over a 120-800 mg dose range. Nearly all patients (98.5%) in both studies experienced adverse events, mostly gastrointestinal (92.5%). Dose-limiting toxicities included rash, fatigue and vomiting. AZD1208 was not tolerated at 900 mg, and the protocol-defined MTD was not confirmed. AZD1208 increased CYP3A4 activity after multiple dosing, resulting in increased drug clearance. There were no clinical responses; PD analysis showed biological activity of AZD1208. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of single-agent clinical efficacy with AZD1208, PIM kinase inhibition may hold potential as an anticancer treatment, perhaps in combination with other agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41416-018-0082-1

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PIM inhibitors have not met expectations in clinical trials.

    “Although initially promising as therapeutic targets, PIM inhibitors have not met expectations in clinical trials15”

    From Endothelial Pim3 kinase protects the vascular barrier during lung metastasis (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results > Efficacy section reports no clinical responses to AZD1208 in the AML study and a 0% objective response rate in the solid-tumour study. But the Discussion also reports therapeutic efficacy for another PIM inhibitor, LGH447, so these findings do not establish that PIM inhibitors generally have fallen short in clinical trials. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cortes, J., Tamura, K., DeAngelo, D. J., de Bono, J., Lorente, D., Minden, M., Uy, G. L., Kantarjian, H., Chen, L. S., Gandhi, V., Godin, R., Keating, K., McEachern, K., Vishwanathan, K., Pease, J. E., & Dean, E.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Center Hospital (JP)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Dean, Emma
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2018-05
Volume
118
Issue
11
Pages
1425-1433
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2803557794
Cited by
120
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca (CA016672)
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (P30 CA016672)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA066996)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
AZD1208, PIM kinase inhibitors, acute myeloid leukemia, solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, dose-limiting toxicity, gastrointestinal adverse effects, CYP3A4 induction, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, maximum tolerated dose, ATP-competitive kinase inhibitors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biphenyl Compounds, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Up-Regulation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Hematologic Neoplasms, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A, Thiazolidines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review