Cited by 26Genetic and rare skin diseases.Skin and Cellular Biology Researchdental development and anomalies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improvement of epidermal covering on AEC patients with severe skin erosions by PRIMA-1MET/APR-246

Open access

Abstract

P63 is a major transcription factor regulating skin development and homeostasis. It controls many genes involved in cell proliferation, adhesion, and early differentiation. P63 is mutated in several rare syndromes called p63-related ectodermal dysplasia syndromes (ED). The main forms are EEC and AEC syndromes due to p63 missense mutations on the DBD and SAM domains, respectively. ED patients display many developmental defects, including ectrodactyly, clef/lip palate, and ectodermal dysplasia, while AEC patients suffer from severe skin erosions that not always heal. We have previously showed that ED-derived iPSC display altered epidermal commitment. P63 belongs to the p53 gene family sharing similar structural domains. We found that ED-iPSC epidermal commitment can be rescued by a p53-reactivating compounds called PRIMA-1 MET, also named APR-246 and currently used in anticancer clinical trials. Here, we established primary epidermal culture from two AEC children (S.F. and Y.M.) suffering from persistent skin erosions at age of 9 and 15, respectively. These patients carry missense mutations on the SAM domain (I576T and I537T). We found that primary keratinocytes (KCs) isolated from these AEC patients underwent altered epidermal differentiation that was rescued by PRIMA-1 MET treatment. It prompted us to formulate the compound onto a cream that was topically applied on the right hand of one patient and on the scalp of the second patient. In both cases, the daily treatment allowed re-epithelialization of the eroded skin and a drastic loss of pain after few weeks, improving quality of life. Normally, mutant p63 exerts a dominant-negative effect, mainly through the formation of aggregate with WT p63 and p73. PRIMA-1 MET did not reduce protein aggregation while enhancing cell differentiation, suggesting that PRIMA-1 MET targets cell differentiation and not p63 activity directly. In conclusion, we propose that repurposing of the antitumoral PRIMA-1 MET compound could become a general treatment of AEC skin erosions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41419-020-2223-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Topical PRIMA-1MET, a p53 reactivator, has been shown to augment epidermal differentiation and improve wound healing in patients with AEC syndrome.

    “Apart from this, PRIMA-1MET, a p53 reactivator, when applied topically, has been shown to augment epidermal differentiation and improve wound healing in patients with AEC syndrome.[57]”

    From Ectodermal Dysplasia – An Overview and Update (2024) · cites this paper as [57]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Vanbokhoven, H., Melino, G., Candi, E. & Declercq, W. p63, a story of mice and men. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 1196–1207 (2011). · DOI
  2. Shalom-Feuerstein, R. et al. ΔNp63 is an ectodermal gatekeeper of epidermal morphogenesis. Cell Death Differ. 18, 887–896 (2011). · DOI
  3. Barbieri, C. E. & Pietenpol, J. A. p63 and epithelial biology. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 695–706 (2006). · DOI
  4. Pignon, J. C. et al. p63-expressing cells are the stem cells of developing prostate, bladder, and colorectal epithelia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8105–8110 (2013). · DOI
  5. Rinne, T., Brunner, H. G. & van Bokhoven, H. p63-associated disorders. Cell Cycle 6, 262–268 (2007). · DOI
  6. Browne, G. et al. Differential altered stability and transcriptional activity of ΔNp63 mutants in distinct ectodermal dysplasias. J. Cell Sci. 124, 2200–2207 (2011). · DOI
  7. Shalom-Feuerstein, R. et al. Impaired epithelial differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells from ectodermal dysplasia-related patients is rescued by the small compound APR-246/PRIMA-1MET. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2152–2156 (2013). · DOI
  8. Zhou, H. & Aberdam, D. A step closer toward therapies for p63-related disorders. Rare Dis. 1, e24247 (2013). · DOI
  9. Mathay, C. et al. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor is induced by disruption of lipid rafts and oxidative stress in keratinocytes and participates in the epidermal response to cutaneous wounds. J. Invest. Dermatol. 128, 717–727 (2008). · DOI
  10. Watanabe, S., Wagatsuma, K., Ichikawa, E. & Takahashi, H. Abnormal distribution of epidermal protein antigens in psoriatic epidermis. J. Dermatol. 18, 143–151 (1991). · DOI
  11. Russo, C. et al. Protein aggregation of the p63 transcription factor underlies severe skin fragility in AEC syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E906–E915 (2018). · DOI
  12. Rangel, L. P. et al. p53 reactivation with induction of massive apoptosis-1 (PRIMA-1) inhibits amyloid aggregation of mutant p53 in cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 3670–3682 (2019). · DOI
  13. Warshauer, E. et al. RBM28, a protein deficient in ANE syndrome, regulates hair follicle growth via miR-203 and p63. Exp. Dermatol. 24, 618–622 (2015). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aberdam, E., Roux, L. N., Secrétan, P.-H., Boralevi, F., Schlatter, J., Morice-Picard, F., Sol, S., Bodemer, C., Missero, C., Cisternino, S., Aberdam, D., & Hadj-Rabia, S.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
  • CEINGE Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore (Italy) (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Aberdam, Daniel
  • Hadj-Rabia, Smail
Venue
Cell Death & Disease
Published
2020-01-16
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
30-30
ISSN
2041-4889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999588368
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Death and Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fondazione Telethon (GGP16235)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › dental development and anomalies
Keywords
aplasia cutis congenita, PRIMA-1MET, APR-246, p53 reactivation, epidermal differentiation, keratinocytes, skin erosion, topical cream, drug repurposing, re-epithelialization, p73
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Cell Differentiation, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Epidermis, Genotype, Humans, Phenotype, Quinuclidines, Transcription Factors, Keratinocytes, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Protein Aggregates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review