Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statin as anti-cancer therapy in autochthonous T-lymphomas expressing stabilized gain-of-function mutant p53 proteins

Tutuska, Karis, Parrilla-Monge, Laura, Di Cesare, Erica, Nemajerova, Alice, Moll, Ute M.·2020·Cell Death & Disease

Abstract

An important component of missense mutant p53 gain-of-function (mutp53 GOF) activities is the ability of stabilized mutp53 proteins to upregulate the mevalonate pathway, providing a rationale for exploring the statin family of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors as anticancer agents in mutp53 tumors. In this small exploratory study we report on the effects of statin treatment in autochthonous mouse models of clinically advanced T-cell lymphoma expressing two different GOF mutp53 alleles. We find that Rosuvastatin monotherapy shows a modest, p53 allele-selective and transient anti-tumor effect in autochthonous T-lymphomas expressing the p53 R248Q DNA contact mutant, but not in tumors expressing the p53 R172H conformational mutant. p53 null mice also do not benefit. In vitro statin sensitivity is not a strong predictor for in vivo sensitivity, while subcutaneous allografts are. Future explorations of statins in combination therapies are justified to improve its anti-tumor effects and to better define the most statin-sensitive alleles and tumor types among mutp53-stabilized cancers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41419-020-2466-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Cardwell, C. R., Mc Menamin, U., Hughes, C. M. & Murray, L. J. Statin use and survival from lung cancer: a population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 24, 833–841 (2015). · DOI
  2. Alfaqih, M. A., Allott, E. H., Hamilton, R. J., Freeman, M. R. & Freedland, S. J. The current evidence on statin use and prostate cancer prevention: are we there yet? Nat. Rev. Urol. 14, 107–119 (2017). · DOI
  3. Gray, R. T., Coleman, H. G., Hughes, C., Murray, L. J. & Cardwell, C. R. Statin use and survival in colorectal cancer: Results from a population-based cohort study and an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 45, 71–81 (2016). · DOI
  4. Huang, W. Y., Li, C. H., Lin, C. L. & Liang, J. A. Long-term statin use in patients with lung cancer and dyslipidemia reduces the risk of death. Oncotarget 7, 42208–42215 (2016). · DOI
  5. Manthravadi, S., Shrestha, A. & Madhusudhana, S. Impact of statin use on cancer recurrence and mortality in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer 139, 1281–1288 (2016). · DOI
  6. Nayan, M. et al. Statin use and kidney cancer survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat. Rev. 52, 105–116 (2017). · DOI
  7. Nielsen, S. F., Nordestgaard, B. G. & Bojesen, S. E. Statin use and reduced cancer-related mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1792–1802 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Wu, Q. J. et al. Statin use and breast cancer survival and risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 6, 42988–43004 (2015). · DOI
  9. Chou, C. W. et al. Therapeutic effects of statins against lung adenocarcinoma via p53 mutant-mediated apoptosis. Sci. Rep. 9, 20403 (2019). · DOI
  10. Liao, J. et al. Atorvastatin inhibits pancreatic carcinogenesis and increases survival in LSL-KrasG12D-LSL-Trp53R172H-Pdx1-Cre mice. Mol. Carcinog. 52, 739–750 (2013). · DOI
  11. Xu, D. et al. Inhibition of mutant Kras and p53-driven pancreatic carcinogenesis by atorvastatin: Mainly via targeting of the farnesylated DNAJA1 in chaperoning mutant p53. Mol. Carcinog. 58, 2052–2064 (2019). · DOI
  12. Dale, K. M., Coleman, C. I., Henyan, N. N., Kluger, J. & White, C. M. Statins and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. JAMA 295, 74–80 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Carrat, F. Statin and aspirin for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma: what are the levels of evidence? Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 38, 9–11 (2014). · DOI
  14. Mantovani, F., Collavin, L. & Del Sal, G. Mutant p53 as a guardian of the cancer cell. Cell Death Differ. 26, 199–212 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Alexandrova, E. M. et al. Improving survival by exploiting tumour dependence on stabilized mutant p53 for treatment. Nature 523, 352–356 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Schulz-Heddergott, R. et al. Therapeutic ablation of gain-of-function mutant p53 in colorectal cancer inhibits stat3-mediated tumor growth and invasion. Cancer Cell 34, 298–314 e297 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Whitesell, L. & Lindquist, S. L. HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 761–772 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Blagosklonny, M. V., Toretsky, J., Bohen, S. & Neckers, L. Mutant conformation of p53 translated in vitro or in vivo requires functional HSP90. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 8379–8383 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Li, D. et al. Functional inactivation of endogenous MDM2 and CHIP by HSP90 causes aberrant stabilization of mutant p53 in human cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 9, 577–588 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Li, D., Yallowitz, A., Ozog, L. & Marchenko, N. A gain-of-function mutant p53-HSF1 feed forward circuit governs adaptation of cancer cells to proteotoxic stress. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1194 (2014). · DOI
  21. Parrales, A. et al. DNAJA1 controls the fate of misfolded mutant p53 through the mevalonate pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1233–1243 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wang, M. & Casey, P. J. Protein prenylation: unique fats make their mark on biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 110–122 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Larsson, O. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: role in normal and malignant cells. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 22, 197–212 (1996). · DOI
  24. Lin, Y. C. et al. Statins increase p21 through inhibition of histone deacetylase activity and release of promoter-associated HDAC1/2. Cancer Res. 68, 2375–2383 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Ingallina, E. et al. Mechanical cues control mutant p53 stability through a mevalonate-RhoA axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 28–35 (2018). · DOI
  26. Abdullah, M. I., de Wolf, E., Jawad, M. J. & Richardson, A. The poor design of clinical trials of statins in oncology may explain their failure - Lessons for drug repurposing. Cancer Treat. Rev. 69, 84–89 (2018). · DOI
  27. Hanel, W. et al. Two hot spot mutant p53 mouse models display differential gain of function in tumorigenesis. Cell Death Differ. 20, 898–909 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Clendening, J. W. et al. Dysregulation of the mevalonate pathway promotes transformation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15051–15056 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Freed-Pastor, W. A. et al. Mutant p53 disrupts mammary tissue architecture via the mevalonate pathway. Cell 148, 244–258 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Turrell, F. K. et al. Lung tumors with distinct p53 mutations respond similarly to p53 targeted therapy but exhibit genotype-specific statin sensitivity. Genes Dev. 31, 1339–1353 (2017). · DOI

Cited by

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Tutuska, K., Parrilla-Monge, L., Di Cesare, E., Nemajerova, A., & Moll, U. M.
Venue
Cell Death & Disease
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
11
Issue
4
ISSN
2041-4889
Cited by
20
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (2RO1CA176647)
  • Stony Brook Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statin as anti-cancer therapy in autochthonous T-lymphomas expressing stabilized gain-of-function mutant p53 proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41419-020-2466-4
The paper
Tutuska, K., Parrilla-Monge, L., Di Cesare, E., Nemajerova, A., & Moll, U. M. (2020). Statin as anti-cancer therapy in autochthonous T-lymphomas expressing stabilized gain-of-function mutant p53 proteins. Cell Death & Disease. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2466-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.