Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 30Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerCancer Mechanisms and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 496 of the 496 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 461 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

p53: from understanding its structure to advances in therapeutic targeting

Open access
Wang, Wenhua, Liu, Xia, Liu, Hengqi, Abolhassani, Hassan, Yan, Han, Zhang, Huilai, Wang, Xianhuo·2026·Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy

Abstract

The tumor suppressor gene TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancers and has been a popular area of research in the field of oncology. The p53 protein, encoded by the TP53 gene, not only binds to many targeted genes but also regulates apoptosis, autophagy, cell cycle arrest, metabolism, senescence and the tumor immune microenvironment to suppress tumorigenesis. In recent years, an increasing number of new functions of p53 have been discovered, and p53-mediated tumor suppressor functions have been greatly expanded. Mutations in TP53 not only abolish its ability to suppress tumorigenesis but also confer carcinogenic properties to p53-mutant cells. Because of the prevalence of p53 dysfunction in various disease types, p53 has long been considered an attractive target for new anticancer drugs. However, drugs targeting p53 are still under investigation in early clinical trials and have not been approved for clinical use. This finding is consistent with the speculation that p53 is widely regarded as "undruggable." Surprisingly, several novel therapeutic approaches targeting p53, including MDM2/4 antagonists, compounds that target specific p53 mutants or restore the wild-type function of the mutated p53 protein, p53-based genetic therapies and p53-based tumor immunotherapy, have been developed in recent years. Here, we present a review of the structure, inactivation, and roles of p53 in diseases. In addition, this review discusses the efforts to target diseases associated with p53 dysfunction and the challenges encountered in the clinical development of these approaches.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This review synthesizes p53 structure, inactivation, biological roles, and therapeutic strategies across cancer and nonneoplastic diseases. It highlights that TP53 is the most commonly mutated cancer gene, that p53 remains largely “undruggable” clinically, and that MDM2/4 antagonists, mutant-p53 reactivators, immunotherapy, and gene therapy are advancing but mostly in early trials.

Key findings

  • TP53 mutations occur in more than 50% of all human malignancies and exceed 70% in squamous esophageal cancer, small-cell lung cancer, squamous cell lung cancer, and complex karyotype AML; rates are lower in lymphoma, melanoma, and overall AML. Most TP53 mutations are missense, with hotspots including G245, R249, R248, R282, R273, Y220, and R175, and exons 5, 7, and 8 are common mutation sites.
  • p53 is a 393-amino-acid protein with five domains (TAD 1–61, PRD 62–94, DBD 95–292, TD 325–356, CTD 357–393) and regulates apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, senescence, autophagy, ferroptosis, metabolism, DNA repair, and the tumor immune microenvironment. Mutant p53 can exert dominant-negative and gain-of-function effects and aggregate, contributing to tumor progression and therapy resistance.
  • Therapeutic small molecules include broad-spectrum mutant-p53 reactivators (e.g., CP31398, PRIMA-1/APR-246, ATO, ReACp53, ADH-6, L1/LH), allele-specific compounds (e.g., PC14586 for Y220C, ZMC1 for R175H, COTI-2), and MDM2/4 inhibitors. Clinical examples: APR-246 plus azacitidine in TP53-mutant MDS/AML gave 1-year RFS 58% and median OS 19.3 months after transplant; APR-246 plus venetoclax with or without azacitidine in TP53-mutated AML had ORR 64% (25/39), CRR 38% (15/39), no DLTs, and ≥grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 47% (23/49).
  • In phase I/II NCT04585750, PC14586 in advanced solid tumors with TP53 Y220C mutation produced 5 partial responses and 7 stable disease among 21 evaluable patients, with mostly grade 1/2 adverse effects. Immunotherapy (vaccines, TCR-like/bispecific antibodies) and gene therapy (adenovirus, nanoparticles, siRNA, CRISPR–Cas9/base editing) show potential but remain early or face safety/delivery challenges.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review, not a primary research study; it synthesizes p53 structure, inactivation, disease roles, and therapeutic targeting in cancer and nonneoplastic diseases.
  • Data/sample: cited literature, figures/tables of p53 domain structure, mutation data from the TP53 database (http://p53.fr/tp53-database/mutation-database), compound tables, and clinical trial tables with NCT identifiers (Tables 3 and 4).
  • Analysis: descriptive and comparative synthesis of mechanistic studies, preclinical models, and clinical trials; no systematic search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, meta-analysis, or quantitative pooling is reported.

Limitations

  • Stated: drugs targeting p53 are still in early clinical trials and none have been approved by the FDA or EMA; most clinical trials are phase I/II, some did not meet primary endpoints and reported DLTs. Mutant p53 heterogeneity means one compound may be effective against only one or a few mutants, and the specific mechanisms of many compounds are unclear. Pure MDM4 inhibitors and MDM2/4 bispecific inhibitors are lacking, and MDM2/4 inhibitors may cause toxicity in normal cells by stabilizing wild-type p53.
  • Stated: gene therapy faces challenges in technology maturity, safety, efficacy, delivery, immunogenicity, liver clearance, and patient acceptance; immunotherapy toxicity is difficult to predict/control because understanding of immunotherapy processes is incomplete. Therapeutics for nonneoplastic diseases are less explored, and p53 inhibition risks tumorigenesis.
  • Evident from text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic literature search, quality/risk-of-bias assessment, or quantitative synthesis; clinical trial coverage is described as partial in tables. The paper also repeatedly notes unresolved or conflicting findings, such as differing mechanisms of CP31398 and APR-246 and context-dependent roles of p53 in metabolic diseases.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41392-025-02549-5

Cites

496 of 496 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 The main domain structure of the full-length p53 protein and the structures of p53 and MDM2/4. a The p53 protein in humans is composed of five distinct domains: the transactivation domain (TAD, AA 1–61), the proline-rich domain (PRD, AA 62–94), the central DNA-binding domain (DBD, AA 95–292), the tetramerization domain (TD, AA 325–356), and the C-terminal regulatory domain (CTD, AA 357–393). A linker region (LR) links the DBD to the TD. AA: amino acid. b p53 monomer structure and 6 hotpots (PDB: 8F2I). c Structure of the human MDMX protein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain (PDB: 3DAB). d MDM2 bound to the transactivation domain of p53 (PDB: 1YCR). e MDMX is shown as a surface (PDB: 3DAB). f MDM2 is shown as a surface (PDB: 1YCR). This figure was created by BioRender.com
Fig. 1 The main domain structure of the full-length p53 protein and the structures of p53 and MDM2/4. a The p53 protein in humans is composed of five distinct domains: the transactivation domain (TAD, AA 1–61), the proline-rich domain (PRD, AA 62–94), the central DNA-binding domain (DBD, AA 95–292), the tetramerization domain (TD, AA 325–356), and the C-terminal regulatory domain (CTD, AA 357–393). A linker region (LR) links the DBD to the TD. AA: amino acid. b p53 monomer structure and 6 hotpots (PDB: 8F2I). c Structure of the human MDMX protein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain (PDB: 3DAB). d MDM2 bound to the transactivation domain of p53 (PDB: 1YCR). e MDMX is shown as a surface (PDB: 3DAB). f MDM2 is shown as a surface (PDB: 1YCR). This figure was created by BioRender.comCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 A simplified scheme of p53 signaling pathways. Under normal circumstances, the p53 protein is tightly regulated by the negative regulator MDM2/4 to maintain low levels of p53 protein expression. The interaction of MDM2/4 promotes the proteasomal degradation of p53 through ubiquitination. Under stress conditions such as DNA damage, hypoxia, and the expression of oncogenes, p53 is activated and stabilized through posttranslational modifications. p53 subsequently accumulates into tetramers in the nucleus and binds to many target genes to regulate a series of processes, including cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, autophagy, senescence, DNA repair, and metabolism. This figure was created by BioRender.com
Fig. 2 A simplified scheme of p53 signaling pathways. Under normal circumstances, the p53 protein is tightly regulated by the negative regulator MDM2/4 to maintain low levels of p53 protein expression. The interaction of MDM2/4 promotes the proteasomal degradation of p53 through ubiquitination. Under stress conditions such as DNA damage, hypoxia, and the expression of oncogenes, p53 is activated and stabilized through posttranslational modifications. p53 subsequently accumulates into tetramers in the nucleus and binds to many target genes to regulate a series of processes, including cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, autophagy, senescence, DNA repair, and metabolism. This figure was created by BioRender.comCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 p53 can regulate the tumor immune microenvironment to suppress tumorigenesis. a The tumor immune microenvironment associated with wild-type p53 plays an antitumor role. Wild-type p53 can increase the expression levels of miR34a and UL16-binding protein 1/2 (ULBP1/2). miR34a reduces PDL1 expression levels through inhibiting PDL1 mRNA translation and promoting PDL1 degradation, which enhances CD8+ T-cell-mediated killing. ULBP1/2, as activating ligands of natural killer (NK) cells, can enhance the cytotoxicity of NK cells. Conversely, wild-type p53 expression can promote the secretion of antitumor cytokines to inhibit tumorigenesis. b In TP53-mutated cells, downregulation of miR34a and ULBP1/2 expression decreases the killing ability of CD8+ T cells and NK cells. Mutated p53 proteins promote the secretion of exosomes that transform M1 macrophages (antitumor cells) into M2 macrophages (protumor cells) by delivering microRNAs such as miR-1246. In addition, cytokines secreted by protumor cells can attenuate the antitumor response. This figure was created by BioRender.com
Fig. 3 p53 can regulate the tumor immune microenvironment to suppress tumorigenesis. a The tumor immune microenvironment associated with wild-type p53 plays an antitumor role. Wild-type p53 can increase the expression levels of miR34a and UL16-binding protein 1/2 (ULBP1/2). miR34a reduces PDL1 expression levels through inhibiting PDL1 mRNA translation and promoting PDL1 degradation, which enhances CD8+ T-cell-mediated killing. ULBP1/2, as activating ligands of natural killer (NK) cells, can enhance the cytotoxicity of NK cells. Conversely, wild-type p53 expression can promote the secretion of antitumor cytokines to inhibit tumorigenesis. b In TP53-mutated cells, downregulation of miR34a and ULBP1/2 expression decreases the killing ability of CD8+ T cells and NK cells. Mutated p53 proteins promote the secretion of exosomes that transform M1 macrophages (antitumor cells) into M2 macrophages (protumor cells) by delivering microRNAs such as miR-1246. In addition, cytokines secreted by protumor cells can attenuate the antitumor response. This figure was created by BioRender.comCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 The activity status of the cGAS/STING pathway under the regulation of wild-type versus mutant TP53. a Normally, the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway induces type I interferons (IFNs) and initiates immune signaling pathways to suppress tumorigenesis. b Mutated p53 can disrupt the downstream cGAS/STING signaling pathway to promote tumorigenesis and immune evasion. This figure was created by BioRender.com
Fig. 4 The activity status of the cGAS/STING pathway under the regulation of wild-type versus mutant TP53. a Normally, the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway induces type I interferons (IFNs) and initiates immune signaling pathways to suppress tumorigenesis. b Mutated p53 can disrupt the downstream cGAS/STING signaling pathway to promote tumorigenesis and immune evasion. This figure was created by BioRender.comCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 TP53 mutation status in cancer. The data were derived from the TP53 database. (http://p53.fr/tp53-database/mutation-database) a Variant type and proportion of TP53. b TP53 mutation rates in different organs. c Distribution of exons and introns with TP53 mutations. This figure was created by BioRender.com
Fig. 5 TP53 mutation status in cancer. The data were derived from the TP53 database. (http://p53.fr/tp53-database/mutation-database) a Variant type and proportion of TP53. b TP53 mutation rates in different organs. c Distribution of exons and introns with TP53 mutations. This figure was created by BioRender.comCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 p53-related diseases, including tumors and nontumor diseases. Nontumor diseases include neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington's disease, and metabolic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), myocardial infarction, and diabetic cardiomyopathy. This figure was created by BioRender.com
Fig. 6 p53-related diseases, including tumors and nontumor diseases. Nontumor diseases include neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington's disease, and metabolic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), myocardial infarction, and diabetic cardiomyopathy. This figure was created by BioRender.comCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Small-molecule drugs targeting p53 in cancer. a Small-molecule drugs that target tumors with missense mutant p53 include those that act broadly on multiple p53 mutants and those that act specifically on the p53 mutant. The former includes CP31398, APR-246, etc., and the latter includes PC14586, which targets the p53 Y220C mutant, etc.). b Small-molecule drugs that target wild-type p53 tumors mainly include MDM2 inhibitors, MDM4 inhibitors, and MDM2 and MDM4 inhibitors. c Small-molecule drugs that deplete mutant p53 include HDAC inhibitors, HSP90 inhibitors, and statins. This figure was created by BioRender.com
Fig. 7 Small-molecule drugs targeting p53 in cancer. a Small-molecule drugs that target tumors with missense mutant p53 include those that act broadly on multiple p53 mutants and those that act specifically on the p53 mutant. The former includes CP31398, APR-246, etc., and the latter includes PC14586, which targets the p53 Y220C mutant, etc.). b Small-molecule drugs that target wild-type p53 tumors mainly include MDM2 inhibitors, MDM4 inhibitors, and MDM2 and MDM4 inhibitors. c Small-molecule drugs that deplete mutant p53 include HDAC inhibitors, HSP90 inhibitors, and statins. This figure was created by BioRender.comCC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 3 Not valid · 355 Not checked · 69 Own results and interpretations

237 more claims

Create a free account to see all 427 claims and to verify the 459 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 168
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 30

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

5 of 8 · the rest aren’t loaded

3 more findings

Create a free account to see every finding of this check.

See all findings — free account

Citations

Cites

Show all 496 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Maecker, H. L., Koumenis, C. & Giaccia, A. J. p53 promotes selection for Fas-mediated apoptotic resistance. Cancer Res. 60, 4638–4644 (2000).

Cited by

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Wang, W., Liu, X., Liu, H., Abolhassani, H., Yan, H., Zhang, H., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN)
  • Children's Medical Center (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Huilai
  • Wang, Xianhuo
Venue
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
Published
2026-04-06
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2059-3635 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7150759957
Cited by
30
References
496
Citations by year
2026: 29
FWCI
21.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (W2412122, 82200208, 8247012736)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy
Keywords
p53, TP53, tumor suppressor, p53 inactivation, TP53 mutation, p53-targeted therapy, p53 restoration, undruggable targets, apoptosis, autophagy, cell cycle arrest, senescence, tumor immune microenvironment
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neoplasms, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Drug Discovery, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-15, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-15 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: p53: from understanding its structure to advances in therapeutic targeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41392-025-02549-5
The paper
Wang, W., Liu, X., Liu, H., Abolhassani, H., Yan, H., Zhang, H., & Wang, X. (2026). p53: from understanding its structure to advances in therapeutic targeting. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-025-02549-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.