The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutralization of Omicron XBB.1 by booster vaccination with BA.4/5 monovalent mRNA vaccine
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The updated version of ARCoV, named ABO1020, encodes the RBD of the Omicron BA.4/5 variant and has stimulated potent neutralizing antibodies against the BA.4/5 and XBB.1 variants when used as a booster following a full course of inactivated vaccination [38].”
From Systemic profiling of immune responses in healthy adults vaccinated with an RBD-targeting COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A thermostable mRNA vaccine against COVID-19
Zhang, N.-N., Li, X.-F., Deng, Y.-Q., Zhao, H., Huang, Y.-J., Yang, G., Huang, W.-J., Gao, P., Zhou, C., Zhang, R.-R., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.024 · Cited by 671
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Callaway, E. Nature 611, 213–214 (2022). · DOI
- Carabelli, A. M. et al. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 162–177 (2023).
- Cao, Y. et al. Nature 614, 521–529 (2023).
- Wang, Q. et al. Cell 186, 279–286 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
- Röltgen, K. et al. Cell 185, 1025–1040 (2022). · DOI
- Hannawi, S. et al. Clin. Transl. Med. 13, e1387 (2023). · DOI
- Wang, Z. et al. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 11, 829–840 (2022). · DOI
- Zou, J. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 854–857 (2023). · DOI
- Miller, J. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 662–664 (2023). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhou, C., Sun, M., Huang, X., Liu, P., Ouyang, Z., Wu, M., Yuan, L., Chen, J., Shu, W., Cao, T., et al. (2025) · hLife · doi:10.1016/j.hlife.2025.04.008 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, H., Zhang, N.-N., Hannawi, S., Zhu, A.-R., Xiong, X.-C., Huang, Y.-J., Yu, D.-D., Chen, C.-J., Dai, J., Abuquta, A., Ying, B., Zhao, J.-C., & Qin, C.-F.
- Venue
- Cell Discovery
- Published
- 2024-01-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2056-5968
- PMC
- PMC10774259
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81925025)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
